Title: Scotland Yard Review | |
MadeleineMcCann > IMPORTANT INFO > Individual Topics | Go to subcategory: |
Author | Content |
TinLizzy | |||
Date Posted:09/09/2011 12:43 PMCopy HTML http://news.scotsman.com/madeleinemccann/Madeleine-McCann-Scotland-Yard-in.6767714.jp
Madeleine McCann: Scotland Yard in fresh review after parents' appeal to CameronPublished Date: 13 May 2011
<!-- google_ad_section_start --><!-- Article Start -->
SCOTLAND Yard is to take a fresh look at the evidence in the case of missing Madeleine McCann after her parents made an appeal for David Cameron to help them revive the search for their daughter, who vanished Portugal in 2007 shortly before her fourth birthday.
Madeleine McCann disappeared during a holiday in the Algarve resort of Praia da Luz in 2007. THIRTY BRITISH POLICE IN NEW MADELEINE MCCANN HUNTFriday September 9,2011 By David Pilditch and Tracey KandohlaA NEW investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann was under way last night after senior Scotland Yard detectives flew to Portugal.
Officers from a 30-strong squad specially set up to revive the search for Madeleine McCann, who vanished four years ago, met Portuguese authorities for the first time. The top secret talks took place last month but details emerged for the first time yesterday. Last night Madeleine’s devoted parents Kate and Gerry told how the development gave them fresh hope of a breakthrough in the hunt for their daughter. Heart specialist Gerry, 42, and former GP Kate, 43, were said to be “extremely pleased” the meeting had taken place. It is the first time any international police force has been searching for Madeleine since the official Portuguese inquiry was shelved in July 2008. The couple’s spokesman Clarence Mitchell said Kate and Gerry believed it was “a positive step in the right direction”.
Madeleine disappeared during a family holiday in the Algarve resort of Praia da Luz on May 3, 2007. Scotland Yard confirmed its officers conducted their first face-to-face “formal meeting” with Portuguese police who led the hunt for her. The McCanns, of Rothley, Leicestershire, believe vital clues were missed and leads never followed up during the shambolic investigation. The despairing couple were left to search for Madeleine by themselves and hired a team of private eyes. They insisted they would never stop looking for Madeleine, who vanished days before her fourth birthday, and were given a huge boost when David Cameron stepped in to help following a personal appeal in May.
Mr Cameron told the couple Home Secretary Theresa May had ordered Scotland Yard to launch a new operation funded by the Government. They were tasked to carry out a review of the investigation from start to finish and bring a new perspective to the case. Yesterday it was revealed the Yard team carrying out the new inquiry consists of 30 officers, the same size as a murder squad. It is being led by Detective Chief Inspector Andy Redwood, of the Met’s Homicide and Serious Crime Command, who has been dubbed Britain’s top cold case detective. The McCanns hope the renewed efforts could unearth a vital new clue in the four-year mystery. Mr Mitchell said: “Kate and Gerry are extremely pleased that the review is progressing. It is a positive step in the right direction.” The Portuguese detectives’ investigation, helped by officers from Leicestershire Police, led to hundreds of possible sightings of Madeleine across the world but so far all have come to nothing. A Scotland Yard spokesman said last night: “Officers from the Metropolitan Police travelled to Portugal at the beginning of August and had their first formal meeting with Portuguese authorities to discuss ways to progress the investigative review.” The McCanns met members of the London-based squad several times before the Portuguese meeting. A source close to the couple said: “They are relieved. Things are finally being done and Kate and Gerry are being kept informed of every move.” The couple, who have six-year-old twins Sean and Amelie, are convinced it is only a matter of time before they get a significant breakthrough. Their private investigators, headed by former Detective Inspector David Edgar, have also met the new team. The family source said: “Kate and Gerry have had several meetings with police reviewing their daughter’s case. They know the officers have a difficult task ahead but they feel positive. They have been told that if something has been missed they will find it. They are relieved that something is finally happening. “Kate and Gerry believe potentially vital clues were missed in the botched Portuguese investigation and their private eyes are hoping the Met will bring a new perspective to the case, which is being conducted in tandem with Portuguese police. The review is still in its very early stages. Officers are busy going through everything from scratch and analysing it.” When the review was announced, Sir Paul Stephenson, the then Metropolitan Police Commissioner, insisted there was “always a chance” it could lead to Madeleine being safely reunited with her parents. The review team has drawn expertise from Scotland Yard’s specialist crime directorate. More officers will be drafted in if new evidence is found, including scenes-of-crime experts and forensic scientists. The team is currently sifting through 20,000 pages of evidence assembled by Portuguese detectives. They will review witness statements, make a fresh appeal for information and carefully re-check alibis. A police source said: “They will be looking for something that has been overlooked or not developed which could lead to a fresh line of inquiry – a sighting, a tip-off, something that didn’t ring bells at the time but could be vital.” Martin Brunt They may not have welcomed the order from Downing Street to launch an investigation into Madeleine McCann's disappearance, but at least Scotland Yard detectives have made a first visit to Portugual. I can't imagine they were given a warm welcome by their Portuguese colleagues whose work (failure to solve the mystery) the Met team is reviewing. Still, it's a step in the right direction and officially the two groups met "with very good co-operation and liaison will continue." There are 30 Met officers - the equivalent of a murder squad - working on the review and I'm told that a senior officer is having to give regular spending updates to the Home Office which is funding an operation that will cost several millions and last many months. It's four months since the review was launched with great fanfare by the Prime Minister after a plea from Kate and Gerry McCann. The couple had long felt abandoned by the British and Portuguese authorities to hunt alone for their missing daughter. But it's difficult to get much information about the operation from the cops, No 10 or the Home Office. A recent Freedom of Information request for answers to a dozen of so questions has been held up by the Yard's FOI man while he considers if the info sought is in the public interest. Maddie 'unites' PJ and English police9 September 2011 | Posted by Leave a Comment
Process: English Prime-Minister forces the review of all information by Henrique Machado Three elite officers from the British investigative police, Scotland Yard, arrived discreetly in Lisbon earlier last month. And they followed immediately to a meeting that was scheduled at the Judiciary Police [PJ] headquarters - in order to "tune up the cooperation mechanisms" in the analyses of new leads in the Maddie case, this was confirmed to Correio da Manhã by Pedro do Carmo [pictured above], the National joint director of the PJ. The news was advanced yesterday by SkyNews after this team, from the Scotland Yard, was created in May by the direct order of Prime Minister David Cameron; following an appeal made to him by Kate and Gerry McCann, parents of the young girl who disappeared in Praia da Luz, Lagos, on the night of May 3, 2007. The aim of the English investigators, who returned to London the following day is to comb thoroughly all the information and leads that were followed in the process - so they can suggest new steps to be taken to the PJ if appropriate. The process is formally archived, "but it is the interest of PJ and of the Scotland Yard that we can, one day, get to the truth of the facts" of what happened in Praia da Luz, Pedro do Carmo adds. The head of the PJ, who chaired the meeting, advanced that it was a "constructive" meeting - that united the British and elements of the PJ from Portimão, where the investigation unfolded. It continues to arrive to the Portuguese and British police dozens of information, anonymous or not, about what could have happened to the English girl, with four years of age then, inside the apartment 5A of the Ocean Club. The majority concern the sightings in various places around the world, which have revealed themselves to be unfounded; others are more credible and have to be checked. Some point to kidnapping; others to the involvement of adults close to the child. David Cameron gave in to the couple The imposition of the British Prime-Minister to the Scotland Yard, in May, at the time of the book launch, ‘Madeleine’, in the United Kingdom, which coincided with the eight birthday of the missing child's disappearance, caused controversy in England. It was seen by some as a populist measure, of a politician that gave a differential treatment to the McCann couple - who had characterized Cameron as a "devout father and family man", asking him for a "independent review and transparent of the process". The Prime-Minister replied assuring them that he would commit the Scotland Yard to the case. "The English have evidence": Gonçalo Amaral, former investigator of the process Correio da Manhã – What can the English police add to the investigation? Gonçalo Amaral – The English can always present the conclusions to which they themselves arrived in 2007. Because they know, they have the evidence of what happened - they don't need to investigate anything. All this is now a mere ‘show off’. – How can these meetings be justified now? – Only in terms of the political image of the English Prime-Minister. They are not coming here certainly to ask to consult a process, that they, from the first hour, have in England and fully translated in English... – Is this another media maneuver from the McCanns? – I don't know, however, if the Scotland Yard is investigating and if they no longer pay their detectives, they can return the money from the book. in Correio da Manhã, September 9, 2011 |
|||
TinLizzy | Share to: #1 | ||
Re:Scotland Yard Review Date Posted:09/09/2011 12:56 PMCopy HTML Extract from transcript of the Metropolitan Police Authority meeting May 2011:
Sir Paul Stephenson (Commissioner, MPS): Critically, do we have the support of Government? That was absolutely essential in this case. In other words, is this something that not only would have Minister support but does the Government support it and is there support from the foreign Government? There is no point in us doing something, or saying we can do something, unless we have that level of cooperation. That is critically important here. I do have to stress, in the case we are talking about, the lead for this investigation remains with the Portuguese authorities. What we are doing is a review. On balance, I decided, taking account of all of that, it was right to take this on as a review. I have also got to say, John and Joanne, this is not unique. This is what the MPS has been doing since time immemorial. This is not criticism as much as transparency - before there was a Police Authority these things took place without any debate. Since there has been a Police Authority, some debate some times, but actually it is what we do. We review. We get involved in a lot of cases where we do not have locus. We always have. Jenny Jones (AM): Did you consider passing this back to Leicestershire Police because they were involved before? You could have given them a bit of expertise from the MPS and they would have perhaps undertaken it. Sir Paul Stephenson (Commissioner, MPS): My officers have spoken to Leicestershire Police and we have a very good cooperation there. I am not entirely sure how I would have done that. If you hear the considerations I have gone through it is about our expertise, it is about receiving money to make sure we do not denude London and it is about we do have the capacity and the capability because of looking to reduce the MIT (Murder Investigation) teams. I am not entirely sure I would be very happy just sending that resource to Leicestershire Police. Jenny Jones (AM): On the issue of funding you have been quoted as saying that there would be no limits on the review. Sir Paul Stephenson (Commissioner, MPS): I was asked a question and I said there are no limits because we have not yet done the review and the scoping. It is not a question of this is open ended. I am very clear we are receiving additional funding to do this task. We have gone through a process. I think I published a letter that asked us would we and the financial conditions. That is what I am getting on with. This is not an open ended cheque and it is not going to go on forever. All I am saying, Jenny, is I cannot set a limit because we have not even done the scoping yet. Kit Malthouse (Chairman): The critical difference to remember is, as Sir Paul [Stephenson] says, it is my understanding, this is a review. This is not an investigation. A review will come up with recommendations which then may be investigated by other parties. It is not an investigation which might just endlessly go looking. It is a periodic review which will come up with some recommendations. Sir Paul Stephenson (Commissioner, MPS): For the sake of clarity we call it an investigative review but we are reviewing existing documentation and data to see if there is anything additional that could be done or we could recommend could be done. Jenny Jones (AM): You have got a certain amount of money from the Government - presumably it is not going to give you a blank cheque - and you will work within those limits? Sir Paul Stephenson (Commissioner, MPS): We will get on with our job and make operational decisions. Then, with oversight from the Home Office, it will pay us quarterly in arrears. Sir Paul Stephenson (Commissioner, MPS): Thanks, Kirsten [Hearn]. Again, I am going to be very careful what I say here because I am conscious that there is a whole range of cases where children are missing and out there are a whole range of parents who are grieving, no matter what the reason is. Those cases range right the way from the most heinous of crimes to runaways and abducted by a parent. What I am going to say next I do not want to cause alarm and distress to parents. We do have a process. When you say believe abducted it does depend on how you define abducted, Kirsten. What we are looking at there are stranger abductions and we have very few stranger abductions. Actually it is a very rare occurrence. I think I am right in saying - I checked this morning - we have had no, to my knowledge, stranger abduction investigations in London in the last ten years. Now stranger abduction is very uncommon. The majority of child abductions are interfamilial and not committed by strangers. It does include a wide range of offences - it does not mean to say we will not do anything but we will proportionately respond - from a divorced parent taking a child abroad, maybe without the consent of a court, for a holiday, right the way through to the very rare but most heinous. The term child applies to anyone under the age of 18 and circumstances surrounding the abduction of a 17 year old can be very different than circumstances around a much younger child. Extract from transcript of the Metropolitan Police Authority meeting June 2011: Jenny Jones (AM): I also wanted to ask you about the Madeline McCann case because you have had five weeks now. I am presuming that you have a resourcing plan for it and I wondered if that is something that you could share with us, because this is a heavy resource commitment and there are opportunity costs? Are you able to tell us how many people are allocated to the review? How many are detectives? How long it is going to go on? I am not asking you now but if you could let us know. Has the Home Office given you a limit on the amount of resources that you can use? Sir Paul Stephenson (Commissioner, MPS): I can give you some answers to that now. I cannot confirm or commit to how long it is going to go on. I would not do that. That is a matter for the team themselves. Secondly, I have not been given any limit by anyone. Thirdly, in terms of numbers engaged on this, I will happily share that information. Jenny Jones (AM): OK. Thank you. Apparently this information has been provided to the MPA but not published. July Meeting - nothing mentioned regarding the McCann case review August meeting - no meeting took place September meeting - nothing in the minutes regarding the McCann case review <!-- m -->http://www.mpa.gov.uk/committees/mpa/2011/0630-agm/<!-- m --> |