Title: No abduction so NEGLECT is irrelevant? | |
MadeleineMcCann > ARCHIVED FORUMS & INFO > HiDeHo Posts | Go to subcategory: |
Author | Content |
TinLizzy | |
Date Posted:03/01/2010 3:29 PMCopy HTML No abduction so NEGLECT is irrelevant?
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->Neglect (not looking after the children properly every evening) is used to justify anger towards the Mc's and it has overshadowed what they really appear to be accountable for and that is what happened to Madeleine! Am I the only one who feels that the Mc's are 'getting away' with concealing Madeleine's death and faking an abduction because everyone is so focused on the need to be angry with them about neglect? It's something the Mc's are, no doubt, happy to hide behind....Its better for them to have everyone angry about neglect (which they may/may not be guilty of). The outrage about 'neglect' suggests she was in the apartment that night and there was an opportunity for an abduction and they are, therefore, not responsible for her disappearance.. There is no indication that an abduction was likely so 'neglect' is irrelevant.<!-- google_ad_section_end --> <!-- div class="online2"> HiDeHo Number of posts: 174 Warning: Points: 391 Reputation: 9 Registration date: 2009-08-29 |