MadeleineMcCann Aimoo Forum List | Ticket | Today | Member | Search | Who's On | Help | Sign In | |
MadeleineMcCann > ARCHIVED FORUMS & INFO > HiDeHo Posts Go to subcategory:
Author Content
TinLizzy
  • Rank:Diamond Member
  • Score:1787
  • Posts:1787
  • From:Canada
  • Register:11/07/2008 1:17 AM

Date Posted:03/01/2010 2:27 PMCopy HTML

Sent: 4/17/2008 9:22 AM
 
HiDeHo
 
Apologies for another 'leak' thread...Please delete or merge as necessary but I am seeing so much focusing on WHO leaked as opposed to recognising that it was very possibly NOT leaked because it was a 'made-up' contrived lie!

In my opinion there is no leak...it was used as a ploy to set up the PJ (which thankfully didnt work) not only about the reconstruction but also for the future in a trial.

What they have accomplished is reminiscent of 'accepting' the neglect' issue...as a trade off for people realising the 'truth' of Maddie being dead on May 3 when they were at the tapas bar.

The 'neglecting of the children' that night and the timeline of their checks is still discussed regardless of 'knowing' the dogs evidence shows Maddie as dead before they left that night.

Everyone now is discussing the 'leak' when it seems obvious to me there IS no leak and therefore no guilty party that leaked it.

Once again they have everyone so involved in discussing who leaked the information when I believe there WAS no discussion...and therefore was no leak!

In all probability Maddie was dead!

Lets suppose Maddie WAS alive....and lets suppose Maddie DID make those comments...does anyone honestly think Kate would have told ANYONE? (" oh...by the way...Maddie was really upset with me this morning.....etcetc.)

In my opinion Maddie was dead...there was no comments said...

A contrived lie was 'leaked' to set up the PJ's credibility for the future...

Probably one of many...

Copyright © 2000- Aimoo Free Forum All rights reserved.