Title: Neglect Accusations - A Welcome Smokescreen for the Truth!

MadeleineMcCann > ARCHIVED FORUMS & INFO > HiDeHo Posts

Go to subcategory： IMPORTANT INFO—— Operation Grange - Scotland Yard Review—— Calendars May - Sept 2007—— HiDeHo4 Videos—— Timelines from Statements—— Discrepancies from Statements—— Individual Topics—— DIscrepancies by Topic—— All Timetables—— Police—— Troll efforts to distractLEVESON INQUIRY—— New Sub-category ExampleSUMMARY OF TOPICS—— Individual TopicsCALENDAR—— Calendar TimetablesCENSORED—— Censored/Banned Books—— Censored/Banned Articles—— Censored/Banned Videos—— Censored Blogs and Forums—— Threats to Sue—— Libel Court ActionTIMETABLES FROM STATEMENTS—— T9 Early Statement Timetables—— Timetables from ROGATORY interviews—— Timetables from STAFF—— Timetables from GUESTS statements—— Timetables from POLICE statements—— Timetables of SPECIFIC TIMES/ACTIVITIES—— T9 StatementsGOVERNMENT / POLICE / GONCALO AMARAL—— Goncalo Amaral—— Government—— Police—— Law—— Goncalo Amaral Comments by TopicDISCREPANCIES—— When Did Madeleine 'Disappear' BEFORE 5.30pm or AFTER?—— Discrepancies by Topic—— Sunday April 29th—— Monday April 30th—— Tuesday May 1st—— Wednesday May 2nd—— Thursday May 3rd—— May 4th Onwards—— Weekly CombinationTIMELINE & RECONSTRUCTIONS—— ALL TIMELINES—— Statement Comments by Topic—— Comparison Timetables—— Timeline Info—— Minute By Minute Reconstruction—— Hour By Hour Tables—— Creche Records / Timeline—— Tennis Timetable & Statements—— The Holiday—— MOBILE—— Clothes Timeline—— Thursday May 3rd 10.00pm - 4.00am—— ALL TIMETABLESMEDIA/HACKING/WIKILEAKS/FOI etc—— Media Involvement—— Ross Hall / Lori CampbellFORENSICS—— Forensic Timeline—— Forensic Documents—— Random Forensic Information—— Random Articles and Comments about ForensicsPICTURES—— Black & White Photos—— HiDeHo Youtube Videos—— Photos—— My Son's Artwork - Madeleine—— The Last Picture—— Images for Twitter—— Images for TwitterPEOPLE INFORMATION—— T9—— Ocean Club Guests—— Ocean Club StaffSUSPECT INFO & TIMELINE—— Suspect Info—— Suspect TimelineINVESTIGATION INFO—— Forensics—— FilesTAPAS/MILLENIUM INFO—— Staff Rota and StatementsMEDIA—— Interviews—— Articles of Guilt—— Articles of Interest—— Misc. Blogs—— Transcripts—— News ArticlesARCHIVED FORUMS & INFO—— The Original Madeleine Forum (Read Only)—— The Very Best of the Old 3A's—— Mirror Forum Threads—— HiDeHo Posts—— Steel Magnolia - IRONSIDE - Dani - @MyNanny25 - Linda—— www.mccannfiles.comVIDEOS—— The SHOCKING VideosFUND—— Fund Articles—— Fund Tables—— Fund InfoGENERAL & ANNOUNCEMENTS—— GENERAL & ANNOUNCEMENTSMAIN TOPICS—— Where was Madeleine hidden?CONTACT REFERENCE—— Media & Government Contact InfoCategorySITE MENU—— Basic Site MenuBOOKS—— Goncalo Amaral Books—— McCann's BookPOPULAR THREADS—— Timelines—— Goncalo Amaral Threads of Interest—— DiscrepanciesMAPS & LOCATIONS—— Photos of Locations—— MapsOdd info

Author

Content

TinLizzy

Rank：Diamond Member Score：1787 Posts：1787 From：Canada Register：11/07/2008 1:17 AM

Date Posted：06/06/2010 7:59 PMCopy HTML HiDeHo  Post subject: Neglect Accusations - A Welcome Smokescreen for the Truth! Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:40 pm  Replies: 38 Views: 482 Why they weren't charged with neglect, is an issue that appears to be uppermost in many people's minds. I believe that neglect was a welcome 'smokescreen' for what really happened that night. I understand that if some people don't give credibility to the dogs findings then May 3rd was a night out (of little over an hour) and Maddie was still alive and she could have been abducted... For those that do believe the dogs......the McCanns were aware of Maddie's death before they went out because of the time needed for the death scent to be released. Neglect issues are very possibly non existent for that night...there is no knowledge as to whether the twins were left alone...Someone could have been in the apartment for that hour... (Whether there is enough evidence for neglect on other nights is a separate issue) Why is May 3rd still considered a 'neglect' issue and a 'night out' to those that believe that Maddie was already dead? (You wonder why they cannot take responsibility and admit to 'neglect' leading to Maddie's disappearance?...It's because it probably didn't happen!..She was maybe already dead!) So.... is there a reason that it is considered neglect because of a 'night out' when it appears to be a little over an hour and according to statements the children were supposedly left alone with no-one nearby for only minutes at a time? (20 minutes maximum from memory). How do we know that they left their children alone? I don't believe that they did. We know from statements there was someone missing from the tapas every night (except little information known about Monday night) so its possible for the children to have been looked after. I have never believed that the doors were left open whether the children were in there or not. Regardless of the children, I would never believe that they would leave their belongings left open to possible theft in a strange country and an apartment that was not inside the complex. In a true abduction scenario..upon realisation that the world was going to know that Maddie was 'abducted' because of their carelessness of leaving the door open, it would be more than likely that they would lie and say they had locked the door. In reality I believe the door was locked and they only changed it when they failed to be able to 'jemmy' the shutters in preparation for the fake 'abduction'... Actually...it was probably irrelevant whether the door was locked or not...during the hour they were at the 'tapas' the 'plans' were in place and maybe someone was in the apartment trying to 'jemmy' the shutters...it failed, and thats why they had to change the comment (doors left open) to allow 'entry' to the apartment. I believe the negligence was faked and all the comments about the other children were put in place to account for, or cover scenarios, not yet known. Jez Wilkin's statement about his 'meeting' with Gerry that night infers that Gerry's comments about leaving the children alone was not the first time he had mentioned it...so maybe at other times, during their tennis lessons, he had taken the opportunity of telling Jez about leaving the children. Jez didn't see it for himself...In his statement he only refers to Gerry telling him (more than once) Who else did Gerry tell and when did he first start telling people about leaving the children? Suggesting the children were left alone is the only way abduction would have been possible. My thoughts are this was put in place AFTER Maddie had died , they needed to have people believing there was an opportunity for an abduction. After a REAL abduction, most people would be trying to influence people to believe they were not to blame that their children's safety was compromised. They WOULDN'T be shouting from the rooftops telling the world that they left the door open with three young children inside in an apartment that was outside the holiday complex. The McCanns 'negative' PR allowing the 'trade-off' neglect accusations, really does seem to have worked! I don't believe they planned it that way, but once 'neglect' became the main issue, clouding the scenario of what the investigation suggests is a simulated abduction, they would be happy to accept the accusations.....Far better than have anyone question what really happened. How could they be charged with neglect if Madeleine was not alive and with the likelihood of someone in the apartment preparing for the abduction? (it was a simulated abduction according to the police files) We cannot believe anything they say...so, why should we believe they left the children alone that night? Neglect has been the smokescreen that has protected them for too long. IMO