MadeleineMcCann Aimoo Forum List | Ticket | Today | Member | Search | Who's On | Help | Sign In | |
MadeleineMcCann > ARCHIVED FORUMS & INFO > The Very Best of the Old 3A's Go to subcategory:
Author Content
TinLizzy
  • Rank:Diamond Member
  • Score:1787
  • Posts:1787
  • From:Canada
  • Register:11/07/2008 1:17 AM

Date Posted:12/20/2010 3:08 AMCopy HTML



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 276 posts ] Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next
AuthorMessage
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:50 pm 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
Zeppo wrote:
Castle craig in Peebles has a hospital in the Netherlands. Gerry McCann did research in the Netherlands,also this is where Madeleine was conceived using 'IVF'. Gerry and Kate visited the Netherlands to help find Madeleine.

Peter McCann is of the Order of Malta, an order which is,or has freemasonry offshoots, The Knights of Malta/The Sovereign Military of Malta.....the Vaticans army. Gerry and Kate were given permission to meet the Pope at the Vatican.

Peter McCann owns a boat and a house on Gozo, nr Malta.

Castlecraig has an Iraq connection.

Blackwater, the USA's private army in Iraq may have used the Knights of Malta logo at one point. The owner of Blackwater is allegedly in the Knights of Malta.

Tony Blair and Rupert Murdoch are reported to be honourary members of the Sovereign Military of Malta.

Castlecraig is just up the road from Stobo Castle. Both have links to the NHS and probably taxpayers money. The owner of Stobo Castle contributed to the FindMadeleine fund.

Allegedly, Gordon Brown is a freemason.


Yes the Freemasons...nobody has mentioned them for a while to my knowledge. I have never given much credence to it but it could be true. I was in Malta in 2006 and met a Freemason who was very high up in the Freemasons there...a very odd character...but he did seem to have all the right connections himself...upper class.

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:59 pm 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
USE OF INTELLIGENCE SERVICES

KazLux posted this on Sun Feb 17, 2008 7:34 am and I think it has relevance here. I thought I had already translated it myself but could not find it on this thread so here it is.

<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130706/http://sosmaddie.dhblogs.be/<!-- m --> 16.02.2008 Paulo Reis Gazeta Digital/Duarte Levy Thread


TAPAS GROUP HAS ALREADY BEEN PREPARED FOR THE INTERROGATIONS

"It will not be an easy task as they have had the time and the advice to help them prepare themselves for the interrogations” stated a British police officer, explaining that the McCann couple and their friends have had recourse to lawyers and other experts to help them prepare and organise themselves.

The investigators, in the United Kingdom as well as in Portugal, have been surprised by a report, made by a group of specialists related to intelligence services, that detailed and revealed the quality of the organisation that has created itself around the parents of Madeleine and the group of friends that accompanied them during their stay in Portugal.

"This is not the work of parents. It's too professional for it to be the work of a couple of doctors, however intelligent they are" our source affirms.

The report, effected in the margin of the investigations by the Police Judiciaire, reveals that the McCann machine has left nothing to coincidence and that each movement on the terrain, each information voluntarily divulged to certain media has been studied before and prepared with well defined objectives.

Lawyers, consultants in communication and image, former soldiers of fortune, detectives, police officers, journalists, doplomats, politicians, IT-specialists amongst others, are part of a kind of well oiled machine where the goal of finding Madeleine seems to have been replaced with another (goal): to direct, and to discredit, the inquiry. A long term work that represents a financial cost that surpasses the amounts donated to the Find Madeleine Fund.

In a practical sense all has started in the same night of the disappearance of the little British (girl): the listing of calls from the Ocean Club and those of the cell phones used by Gerry and Kate have revealed some very strange receivers (of calls), surpassing by far the simple appeal to the family or to the police."

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 4:30 am 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
Spiked Online
<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130706/http://www.spiked-online.com/<!-- m --> Tuesday 19 February 2008 By Tim Black

THE RETURN OF THE PAEDOPHILE PANIC

By granting people access to info about sex offenders, the Home Office is institutionalising fear of adults and paranoia about ‘the mob’.

They are at it again, it seems, both frightening children and terrifying parents. That’s right, the New Labour government has once more stoked the fires of the paedophile panic. Parents, it has announced, will be able to enquire whether a new friend, partner or colleague is a paedophile - a measure which is likely to nurture fear and paranoia in the UK.

First came the Sex Offenders Register in 1997. Currently listing around 29,000 people, from children who’ve groped other children, teachers who’ve had liaisons with students, to those who’ve sexually abused young children, it is an unwieldy, indiscriminate testament to the special place the child sex offender occupies in the contemporary imagination. Its effect has been profound. The sex offender has now been officially distinguished as a breed of criminal apart, one that requires constant monitoring and house visits. Unlike others who have broken the law, the sex offender is forever stained by his offence, a subject of endless control. For the public the paedophile has become an everyday nightmare; a faceless threat living amongst us, but not like us – the enemy within. Seen in this way, it’s not surprising that since the compilation of the Sex Offenders Register, there have been periodic attempts to have its listed names made publicly available.

On Sunday came something of a breakthrough in this regard. UK home secretary Jacqui Smith finally announced that parents will be able to enquire if a new partner or a ‘named individual’ - for example someone coming into regular contact with their child, like a relative or a neighbour - possesses any convictions for child sex offences. This doesn’t mean they will receive an answer exactly. Rather, the police will then decide what information to disclose depending on whether they believe that the specified individual poses a risk. Such a move, coming on the back of last summer’s Home Office Review of the Protection of Children from Sex Offenders, has been hailed by some as a major step on the way to putting ‘Sarah’s law’ in place.

‘Sarah’s law’, named after Sarah Payne, the eight-year-old girl murdered by convicted child molester Roy Whiting in 2000, is about giving parents access to information about sex offenders: their whereabouts, their crimes, their threat level. It would be the UK equivalent of ‘Megan’s law’, itself alluding to the case of Jesse Timmendequas, a convicted sex offender, who killed seven-year-old Megan Kanka in 1994. The revulsion to Timmendequas’s crime was such that 50 US states eventually passed Megan’s law; that is, they began to grant free public access to information on the history and location of high-risk sex offenders.

Yet while the Home Office’s new measures do not amount to the full ‘community-wide disclosure’ that Sarah’s law campaigners advocate, and which Megan’s law encapsculates, its new measures do suggest that it’s perfectly sensible to suspect a new boyfriend or a grandparent of being a paedophile. In this sense, the new powers do achieve one unwitting objective of ‘Megan’s law’ - they institutionalise a fear of others. More specifically, they actively encourage parents to view every other adult as a potential threat to their child. Not to do so could almost be viewed as a dereliction of parental duty. Just as the Sex Offenders Register exists as a permanent warning to the nation that there are evil people out there, so the invitation to inquire about our friends, relatives and colleagues - to check whether they are paedophiles - nurtures fear and finger-pointing. The Home Office is creating a climate of suspicion and spying on the back of the already overblown paedophile panic; every adult is invited to see other adults as potentially wierd and dangerous.

In not quite going so far as Megan’s law, as the Sarah’s law campaigners are demanding, the Home Office could be nurturing paranoia, too. Instead of granting community-wide and publicly available disclosure of offenders’ whereabouts, the Home Office is leaving disclosure to the discretion of the police and probation services. Far from making the new measures a more ‘acceptable’ version of Megan’s law, this is likely to make people ask: ‘What if the police are withholding something that I should know?’ On the parent’s side, this sense of the unknown provides a perfect climate in which to imagine the worst of everyone, despite the assurances of the authorities.

Many of the supporters of the Home Office’s new measures, be it the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, Barnado’s or various commentators, seem pleased that it has stopped short of Megan’s law. They are relieved that there will not be full disclosure of offenders’ whereabouts because apparently this might give rise to outbursts of anti-paedophile lynch mobs and vigilantism. On one hand, we have the government institutionalising fear of adults who come into contact with children - on the other hand, charities and opinion-formers spread fear about out-of-control communities that might use the disclosed information to run riot and burn people’s homes down.

Indeed, by not going as far as full disclosure, the Home Office itself evinces a distrust of the public that is all too typical of today’s estranged political elite. As Martin Narey, chief executive of Barnado’s, a supporter of the new measures, argued, full disclosure might ‘drive paedophiles underground’, making them near impossible to monitor. Why would this happen? Because the public, apparently infused by the irrational fervour of the mob, would hound them with threats of b****y and brutal revenge.

Yet as spiked‘s editor Brendan O’Neill argued in relation to the semi-apocryphal tale of a mob hounding a paediatrician in Gwent, South Wales in 2000, stories of rampant vigilantism are frequently exaggerated, and are used to justify a particularly patronising attitude to the public. In a report for BBC News Online, O’Neill wrote: ‘The irony is that some in the media, in challenging the scaremongering over sex offenders, indulge in some scaremongering of their own. They raise fears about violent tabloid-reading protesters who will attack, hound and destroy a paediatrician - which seem to be just as unfounded as the fears about thousands of paedophiles stalking the land.’ (See Whispering game, BBC News.) Deemed incapable of handling the full story without erupting into a seething, ignorant mass of hate, the public can only be given what the authorities deem to be a safe amount of information. At the same time as fomenting and institutionalising suspicion of others, the partial nature of these measures confirm the political elite’s disparaging attitude towards an unpredictable public.

The real story here has little to do with paedophiles or their purported lynchers. It has to do with a government so short of popular support that it’ll fasten on to anything it believes the public agrees upon. Hence Jacqui Smith’s self-regarding congratulations in yesterday’s Sun newspaper: ‘I congratulate The Sun and its readers for campaigning on this issue.’ And what could be better than the ready-made solidarity of the good fight against the paedophile menace? After all, you’ll not find many people coming out in support of child abuse.

The political exploitation of fear and the accompanying moral grandstanding are the key problems in the paedophile panic. As a result, a prevailing fear of other adults, indeed, of adults’ intentions towards children, will be further exacerbated by the new measures. While these measures are likely to prove ineffective when it comes to protecting the small numbers of children who are at genuine risk, they will succeed in one aspect: they will give the interminable hunt for the paedophile in our midst legal sanction. The Home Office has not demonstrated that Britain really is at risk from marauding paedophiles or thick, rampant communities - but it has, once again, shown its dislocation from and distrust of the British public, and its political opportunism.

<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130706/http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php<!-- m -->? ... icle/4557/The One And Only MF

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 7:15 am 
Been Cautioned

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:15 am
Posts: 321
Estelle wrote:
USE OF INTELLIGENCE SERVICES

KazLux posted this on Sun Feb 17, 2008 7:34 am and I think it has relevance here. I thought I had already translated it myself but could not find it on this thread so here it is.

<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130706/http://sosmaddie.dhblogs.be/<!-- m --> 16.02.2008 Paulo Reis Gazeta Digital/Duarte Levy Thread


TAPAS GROUP HAS ALREADY BEEN PREPARED FOR THE INTERROGATIONS

"It will not be an easy task as they have had the time and the advice to help them prepare themselves for the interrogations” stated a British police officer, explaining that the McCann couple and their friends have had recourse to lawyers and other experts to help them prepare and organise themselves.

The investigators, in the United Kingdom as well as in Portugal, have been surprised by a report, made by a group of specialists related to intelligence services, that detailed and revealed the quality of the organisation that has created itself around the parents of Madeleine and the group of friends that accompanied them during their stay in Portugal.

"This is not the work of parents. It's too professional for it to be the work of a couple of doctors, however intelligent they are" our source affirms.

The report, effected in the margin of the investigations by the Police Judiciaire, reveals that the McCann machine has left nothing to coincidence and that each movement on the terrain, each information voluntarily divulged to certain media has been studied before and prepared with well defined objectives.

Lawyers, consultants in communication and image, former soldiers of fortune, detectives, police officers, journalists, doplomats, politicians, IT-specialists amongst others, are part of a kind of well oiled machine where the goal of finding Madeleine seems to have been replaced with another (goal): to direct, and to discredit, the inquiry. A long term work that represents a financial cost that surpasses the amounts donated to the Find Madeleine Fund.

In a practical sense all has started in the same night of the disappearance of the little British (girl): the listing of calls from the Ocean Club and those of the cell phones used by Gerry and Kate have revealed some very strange receivers (of calls), surpassing by far the simple appeal to the family or to the police."



"... to direct, and to discredit, the inquiry" I find the entirety of this particular post very disturbing.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:25 am 
You're Nicked
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:47 pm
Posts: 253
bonnybraes1 wrote:
There are some days when you find sections of the human race disgusting beyond words. Amazing how many of these abominations hide behind a cloak of "respectability".

A lot more than we would care to know I think bonnybraes. I used to live at one of Britain´s famous stately homes, I was brought up around there, you would not believe some of the goings on that occurred, all very hushed up of course, but local people knew. Many high profile people really are a disgrace.


all true


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 3:33 am 
Suspect
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:56 pm
Posts: 104
Location: Somewhere ALONG The Rainbow...
I´ve just finished to read all this thread.
It´s the first time I´ve seen it. It was referred to me by another person and honestly only now I have the dimension of all this.

Estelle, how can we go deeply? How can we, with our will to know the thruth, do something else?

Did you send(for exemple) this thread link to the most important departments of the British government?
Did you send this thread link to the mccanns email(website?).
Do you want us(I´m talking to me) to do something?
I´m not English. I didn´t know all the whereabouts that are here exposed, although I just came here because I was told of some of those things.
I don´t know what to say, I just saw so many theories and for all this time I was never inclined for paedophilia as the cause of Madeleine´s death, although I can understand that the coverage is as if it was to cover something tremendous. My opinion is that this had been growing like a snowball and now they can´t go back amongst so many lies and obstructions to the justice and all we know about.

When will Gordon Brown finish his charge? Sometimes is after the left of the previous that many things are known by the ones who follow.
I always relationed Madeleine´s death with sex, but not directely with her. No. I trully believed in the accident theory: Madeleine was interrumpting her mother and one of her friends that were together in the apartment. Than, something happened - a push, a slap, a fall down and from that moment all was running out of order.
But yes, it looks like as if it was a "made to happen" happening.
I was not around this paedophile theory, not because it may be a taboo for me. No. The great disaster is its existence and not discuss to it.
It has to be discussed. The children´s predators must know that prents or not parents, all the society, all the citizens are paying attention and puting what each one know about in the eyes of the public, as you did so well.

Estelle, all I can say is that all can have happened. It hurts when I think about it, but it is not because of our "hurts" that we can run and look aside as if it was nothing.
The children suffering and the marks they keep for all their lives is much more important than your fear of think because it hurts.

If I can be useful in any way to join for something, to distribute handout(for exemple) or whatever, you may count me in.
My will this very moment was to copy thousands of this thread and let the persons know about it, or better, let the persons know that we know about it.
They have to be scared. Criminals, when scared commit errors. We must play with their errors and wait. Wait that someone, somewhere finnaly decide to tell what they know.

Untill then, what can be done by us, common citizens?
If you want, pm me for further communication.
Now I´ll think about all this and try to join the pieces of the puzzle that you so well began.

Estelle, why, in front of so serious things as these ones you have written here, the persons almost don´t say "big thing"? Isn´t it to put our hair all up and think about at least make "them" know...what are our suspicions? I think it is!

Thank you for all your information and for your "food to think".
I´m Portuguese and I´m available to do whatever(inside my own limits) about this. But, with no offense, I think British people, along UK, should be even more interested on this. It has all to do with your gov, although I know PT gov had also followed British "instructions" about this case. I think that, first in UK, second here in Portugal and then around the world, it has to be disclosed. We may not forget that we have here persons from lots of countries.

Thank you, Estelle. I red(finnaly) all this thread I´ve been talked for some time and yes, it is to think deeply and to act.

Summertime


This time I hadn´t a little peek on the text. I´m so tired!
Forgive the so many spelling errors I must have here. As far as you understand, it´s the main thing.

_________________
Don´t disguise. Life is to live.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:09 am 
You're Nicked

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 3:41 am
Posts: 239
It's certainly true Freemasonry is no badge of honour.

I recall a case of a local man who was a freemason involved with children's homes who was convicted on child porn charges some years ago.

Secret societies are always a bad idea.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 5:47 am 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
Summertime wrote:
I´ve just finished to read all this thread.
It´s the first time I´ve seen it. It was referred to me by another person and honestly only now I have the dimension of all this.

Estelle, how can we go deeply? How can we, with our will to know the thruth, do something else?

Did you send(for exemple) this thread link to the most important departments of the British government?
Did you send this thread link to the mccanns email(website?).
Do you want us(I´m talking to me) to do something?
I´m not English. I didn´t know all the whereabouts that are here exposed, although I just came here because I was told of some of those things.
I don´t know what to say, I just saw so many theories and for all this time I was never inclined for paedophilia as the cause of Madeleine´s death, although I can understand that the coverage is as if it was to cover something tremendous. My opinion is that this had been growing like a snowball and now they can´t go back amongst so many lies and obstructions to the justice and all we know about.

When will Gordon Brown finish his charge? Sometimes is after the left of the previous that many things are known by the ones who follow.
I always relationed Madeleine´s death with sex, but not directely with her. No. I trully believed in the accident theory: Madeleine was interrumpting her mother and one of her friends that were together in the apartment. Than, something happened - a push, a slap, a fall down and from that moment all was running out of order.
But yes, it looks like as if it was a "made to happen" happening.
I was not around this paedophile theory, not because it may be a taboo for me. No. The great disaster is its existence and not discuss to it.
It has to be discussed. The children´s predators must know that prents or not parents, all the society, all the citizens are paying attention and puting what each one know about in the eyes of the public, as you did so well.

Estelle, all I can say is that all

can have happened. It hurts when I think about it, but it is not because of our "hurts" that we can run and look aside as if it was nothing.
The children suffering and the marks they keep for all their lives is much more important than your fear of think because it hurts.

If I can be useful in any way to join for something, to distribute handout(for exemple) or whatever, you may count me in.
My will this very moment was to copy thousands of this thread and let the persons know about it, or better, let the persons know that we know about it.
They have to be scared. Criminals, when scared commit errors. We must play with their errors and wait. Wait that someone, somewhere finnaly decide to tell what they know.

Untill then, what can be done by us, common citizens?
If you want, pm me for further communication.
Now I´ll think about all this and try to join the pieces of the puzzle that you so well began.

Estelle, why, in front of so serious things as these ones you have written here, the persons almost don´t say "big thing"? Isn´t it to put our hair all up and think about at least make "them" know...what are our suspicions? I think it is!

Thank you for all your information and for your "food to think".
I´m Portuguese and I´m available to do whatever(inside my own limits) about this. But, with no offense, I think British people, along UK, should be even more interested on this. It has all to do with your gov, although I know PT gov had also followed British "instructions" about this case. I think that, first in UK, second here in Portugal and then around the world, it has to be disclosed. We may not forget that we have here persons from lots of countries.

Thank you, Estelle. I red(finnaly) all this thread I´ve been talked for some time and yes, it is to think deeply and to act.

Summertime


This time I hadn´t a little peek on the text. I´m so tired!
Forgive the so many spelling errors I must have here. As far as you understand, it´s the main thing.


I am an Australian, so I would prefer others to send this where they think is appropriate.

You have my permission any of you to send it if you think it wll help.

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:09 am 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
SOME ARTICLES TO PONDER ABOUT:
<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130706/http://www.tpuc.org/node/34<!-- m -->

'BLAIR COVERING UP PAEDOPHILE SCANDAL?'

While British Prime Minister Tony Blair is under criminal suspicion in the "honours-for-cash" scandal that has rocked his Labour government, we have been told that there is an even more explosive scandal that Blair, up to now, has managed to hide behind the draconian British policy of issuing "D-Notices," government orders that prohibit the British media from reporting on certain "national security" cases.

In 1999, an international investigation of child pornographers and paedophiles run by Britain's National Criminal Intelligence Service, code named Operation Ore, resulted in 7,250 suspects being identified in the United Kingdom alone. Some 1850 people were criminally charged in the case and there were 1451 convictions. Almost 500 people were interviewed "under caution" by police, meaning they were suspects. Some 900 individuals remain under investigation. In early 2003, British police began to close in on some top suspects in the Operation Ore investigation, including senior members of Blair's government.

However, Blair issued a D-Notice, resulting in a gag order on the press from publishing any details of the investigation. Blair cited the impending war in Iraq as a reason for the D-Notice. Police also discovered links between British Labour government paedophile suspects and the trafficking of children for purposes of prostitution from Belgium and Portugal (including young boys from the Casa Pia orphanage in Portugal).

TONY BLAIR: STIFLING INVESTIGATIONS OF PAEDOPHILES IN HIS LABOUR GOVERNMENT.

In the United States, Operation Ore's counterpart was Operation Avalanche. However, U.S. authorities only charged 100 people out of 35,000 investigated. The international paedophile investigation began when Dallas police and the US Postal Inspection Service raided the offices of Landslide Productions of Fort Worth, Texas and confiscated records on thousands of people around the world who were child pornography customers of the firm. Landslide's halcyon days as a Fort Worth-based international online marketplace of kiddie porn was during the term of Texas Governor George W. Bush.

WMR has learned that the Bush administration, like that of Blair, is rife with paedophiles in top positions. The paedophile network also extends to the U.S. defense industry, particularly some of the companies that have been involved in the sexual abuse of minors at overt and covert U.S. prisons in Abu Ghraib, Iraq; Guantanamo, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Thailand, and now, at three prisons in Ethiopia.

'COMMONS CLERK ON TRIAL AFTER IT FIND THOUSANDS OF IMAGES OF CHILDREN PERFORMING SEXUAL ACTS'

Tony Blair's closest confidante's is a practising paedophile, are even suggesting that this particular scandal, and not Blair's repeated lies and fabricated reports in regard to Iraq, may well prove the downfall of a government mired in sleaze and corruption.

The Sunday Times is reported to have obtained an FBI list of Labour MPs who have used credit cards to pay for internet child pornography, and Blair has responded by imposing a massive news blackout, failing however to stop the arrest of one of his most important aides, Phillip Lyon.

Lyon used his computer "to pursue his interest and perhaps curiosity in this type of material. He searched for it on the internet and, when found, downloaded it for his delectation later", said Ms Karmy-Jones.

Lyon, 38, from Stanford le Hope in Essex, denies 12 specimen charges of making an indecent image of a child between October 2001 and April 2002. "It is like a drug, you try one and you want to try something harder, and it has a snowball effect," he is alleged to have told officers when arrested.

Lyon worked in the Upper Table Office, where he met MPs, the Speaker, and Deputy Speaker while checking parliamentary questions and administering early day motions. "He needed skills in computing and the internet," said Ms Karmy-Jones. "He is an intelligent individual, and knew full well what he was doing." When first interviewed, he allegedly told police he did not distribute material - "I just look at pictures."

Ms Karmy-Jones told jurors: "This case is about child pornography - what others might call photos of child abuse. When I say child abuse, it may sound harsh, but it is the nature of these images which is central to the case. They are unpleasant and disturbing." She said the issue might be whether it was Lyon who downloaded the images. "We say it is clear he was that man."

Under Blair's government paedophiles get off with a slap on the wrist 'Proof'

There is a lot more here that is being exposed. We already know about Lord George Robertson's (ex UK Defence Secretary 1997/98 and Sec Gen of Nato) links with Thomas Hamilton (Dunblane), procurer of young boys and a massive British establishment [Masonic] cover up.

Blair government insider Lord Robertson has threatened to sue Scotland's leading independent newspaper over internet allegations that he not only used his influence as a Freemason to procure a gun licence for child killer Thomas Hamilton, but was also a member of a clandestine paedophile ring reportedly set up by Hamilton for the British elite.

On 13 March 1996, Hamilton, armed with four hand-guns, opened fire on a junior school class, killing 16 children and one teacher before turning the gun on himself, shattering forever the idyllic 13th century Scottish town of Dunblane. Lord Robertson was the referee on Thomas Hamilton's shotgun licence. [FACT]

Blair government, which has already issued a D-Notice to gag the press from revealing the names of known paedophiles within the British executive, including at least two senior ministers; and the case highlights the government's NATO boss and Blair government insider Lord Robertson has threatened to sue Scotland's leading independent newspaper over internet allegations that he not only used his influence as a Freemason to procure a gun licence for child killer Thomas Hamilton, but was also a member of a clandestine paedophile ring reportedly set up by Hamilton for the British elite.

Tony Blair's closest confidante's is a practising paedophile, are even suggesting that this particular scandal, and not Blair's repeated lies and fabricated reports in regard to Iraq, may well prove the downfall of a government mired in sleaze and corruption. The Sunday Times is reported to have obtained an FBI list of Labour MPs who have used credit cards to pay for internet child pornography, and Blair has responded by imposing a massive news blackout, failing however to stop the arrest of one of his most important aides, Phillip Lyon.

The latest allegations came to light following a campaign to lift the secrecy on the Dunblane massacre. Large sections of the police report were banned from the public domain under a 100-year secrecy order. Lord Cullen, an establishment insider, also omitted and censored references to the documents in his final report. Parents and teachers were advised to concentrate their efforts on a campaign to outlaw handguns instead of focusing on how the mentally unstable Freemason, already known by the police to be a paedophile, had obtained a firearms licence for six handguns. Hamilton allegedly enjoyed good relations with both local Labour luminary George Robertson and Michael Forsyth, the then Scottish Secretary of State and MP for Stirling. Forsyth congratulated and encouraged Hamilton for running a boy's club. Hamilton was also found to have exchanged letters with the British monarch, Queen Elizabeth.

Nowwhere in this is there a national security risk so great, that documents part of the public enquiry are now state secrets to be held for 100 years? Funny kind of public enquiry. Why, when Thomas Hamilton's application for a gun licence was turned down, due to him being regarded as a man of unsound character [and] him being the object of several paedophilia investigations, did his MP, our friend George Robertson (now Lord Robertson, Secretary-General of NATO), write him a glowing character reference, and personally see to it that his application was successful, when he knew the grounds for the original refusal were because he was suspected of procuring boys for sexual services?"

Dunblane may have been just over 11 years ago, but the questions still loom, that have to be answered.

1.No proper Autopsy and no inquest on Hamilton?

2. Reasons unknown - Shoots Kids? - was he a scapegoat to get rid of evidence of a paedophile ring of MP's and Mason's in Scotland? - there seems to be mounting evidence to prove this theory.

3. Receives Shotgun Licence even though he was turned down by normal channels - Why was Lord Robertson not prosecuted for refereeing his application?

4. Why did he shoot himself with a different gun from the one he shot the kid's with, even though the first gun still hand rounds in it? - strange to say the least.

These and many more questions, still remain unanswered.

'Assorted Party Political Perverts for your attention'

. Tory Party General election candidate, Michael Powell - Convicted and jailed for 3 years for downloading hardcore child porn.

. Tory Party Councillor (Wickbar/Bristol) Roger Talboys - Convicted and jailed for 6 years for multiple sex attacks on children

. Tory Party MP (Billericay) Harvey Proctor - Stood trial for sex offences of a sado-masochistic nature against teenage boys, and was forced to resign.

. Tory Party Councillor ( Stratford-upon-Avon ) Christopher Pilkington - Convicted of downloading hardcore child porn on his PC. Placed on sex offenders register and forced to resign.

. Tory Party councillor ( Coventry ), Peter Stidworthy - Charged with indecent assault of a 15-year old boy.

. Tory Party Mayor ( North Tyneside ), Chris Morgan - Forced to resign after being arrested twice in 2 weeks, for indecent assault on a 15-year old girl, and for suspicion of downloading child porn.

. Tory Party Liaison Manager on the London Assembly, Douglas Campbell, who's job includes running the Tory GLA website - Arrested for allegedly downloading child porn. He is currently suspended while the Police investigation continues.

. Tory Party Councillor (Folkestone - in Leader, Michael Howard's constituency), Robert Richdale - 41 year history of crime, involving 30 convictions and 5 prison sentences. Richdales enormous criminal record, which covers 10 pages of A4 paper, includes convictions for assault, theft, causing death by dangerous driving, forgery, drugs offences, possession of an offensive weapon, and sex attacks against underage schoolgirls. The Tory Party election campaign literature described Richdale as "a family man" who had a "compassionate personality"

. Labour Councillor (Newton Aycliffe) Martin Locklyn - Convicted and jailed for 15 years for sexually abusing 3 14-year-old boys.

. Labour Councillor (North Lincolnshire) David Spooner - Convicted and jailed for 1 year for masturbating in front of 2 young boys.

. Labour Mayor (Westhoughton/Lancashire) Nicholas Green - Convicted and jailed for 10 years for 3 rapes and 13 counts of indecent assault against little girls between the age of 6 and 10. He raped one woman on her wedding day.

. Prominent Labour Party activist Mark Tann (who has met Tony & Cherie at Party functions) recently got a 15-year sentence for raping a 4-year old girl on 2 separate occasions.

. Entire Labour Party conspired to conceal the activities of Labour Party activist and serial child-molester Mark Trotter, who died from AIDS before he could be convicted.

. Labour Councillor (Manchester), George Harding - Charged with indecent assault on a girl of 12.

. According to media reports, the names of 2 former Labour Cabinet Ministers said to be `Household names` appear on the `Operation Ore ` list of subscribers to hard-core child pornography. The same FBI investigation, which led to the arrest of rock star Pete Townshend.

So who are they Mr Blair?

. William Straw - Son of Labour Foreign Secretary, and former Home Secretary - Jack Straw, was cautioned by Police for drug dealing, amid a frantic Government attempt to cover up the matter and gag the media as to his identity. Jack Straw also has a brother who was convicted of a sex attack on a schoolgirl. Lovely family!

. Homosexual mass murderer; Dennis Nielsen, who strangled and dismembered 16 young men in the 1980`s, was also a highly active member of Labour fringe groups such as the Anti-Nazi League, and the SWP. That's when he wasn't busy boiling peoples heads in a pot, or masturbating over the corpses of his victims.

. Lib-Dem Council candidate (Tower Hamlets), Justin Sillman - Convicted and jailed for 2 years for sexual abuse of young boys.

. Lib-Dem Councillor and Mayoral Candidate ( Sheffield ), Francis Butler- Prosecuted for indecent assault of a young boy.

. Lib-Dem Councillor ( Stockport ) Neil Derbyshire - Sexually assaulted a 16-year old boy in a public toilet. He was caught with a plastic bag containing lubricant, plastic surgical gloves, a condom, and underpants.

. Lib-Dem Councillor ( Preston ), Bill Chadwick - Charged with: Making an indecent photograph of a child, Incitement to rape, Incitement to murder, Incitement to kidnap, and Incitement to torture. Chadwick's gay lover - Alan Valentine, is also a Lib-Dem councillor.

This we are afraid is only the tip of the iceberg. "

On November 18th, 2007 jerrywr says: I remember reading in the Dail Express in the newspaper archives during the reporting on Operation Ore that Peter Mandelson was allegedly named as one of the senior ex-Cabinet Ministers who had used his credit card to download child pornography. He is of course now the EU Commissioner for Trade and has a lifetimes immunity from prosecution. I believe also that it was claimed that a Welsh student had allegedly used Peter Mandelsons name to obtain the photos. How he allegedly came to have Peter Mandelsons credit card was not I think explained. I have tried to find the DE report subsequently but could not find it so am wondering if another cover up has taken place. I wrote to the DE and asked for the date of the reference but got no reply. I wonder if an application to the Met Police under the FoI Act would confirm PM's name on the FBI list. Alternatively perhaps someone in the USA could get it from the FBI.

In addition there was the case of the married Liberal Democrat MP who was said to have entertained two rent boys in bed in such obscene acts that they could not be reported!

On February 8th, 2008 Anonymous says: Gerard Kauffman is also allegedly on the original list - there was a documentary recently going into production at the BBC about him and several other politicians with alleged paedophile links - the project was scrapped after pressure from above!

Our slovenly press and media. It is stunning that the press has missed all this, the biggest story in a thousand years. Truly the quality of our journalists is abysmal. No wonder the art of investigative journalism is dead. In the BBC's case it's simple
sabotage, with hundreds of Common Purpose people in positions of power.

The biggest contributing factor to the break down of the British society is our government and the way it has changed the character of the majority.
Political Correctness is, amongst other things, is at the core of the way the British people now think. Ludicrous changes to the way we are supposed to speak are at the forefront of the change.

Political spin, alongside the complete nonsense propaganda spouted everyday by the likes of the tabloids and the BBC have corrupted the rational thinking of the populace. Political spin and an endless onslaught of “you should do this” or “you should say this” have shut down the thinking persons brain stems.

This has been done to stop us thinking, for a thinking person cannot be deceived. To continue their reign of lies and pure deceit that have to keep us in a sense of dullness, just accepting what they say as being true. Don’t think for yourself, for we will do it for you.

As people are more sucked in by this onslaught, they forget to object to the things that are changing around them. They might mown for a second and voice a pathetic outburst subdued by their lack of thinking, then return to the norm of their daily routine. Their propaganda controlled brain cannot, and will not even register, that they should be raising an objection to what they have just said. Their brain will not let them voice concern for it is dissent against the almighty executive, that their brain has been taught not speak out about.

Failing family values are not a concern anymore, as long as they can watch East Enders with a can of Stella. The true British values have died from the continual onslaught of government spouted c***.

Brainwash us, dilute us, destroy us, deceive us the list is never ending, the Fabians have reduced our country to something like an Equilibrium, all they need now is martial law and curfews to finish the job completely.

How many people will object? For the populace we decree “they are only doing it for our safety” as the disillusioned sheep imprison themselves further, with a blind image that “this must be the British way, for the government told me so”.

<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130706/http://www.tpuc.org/node/95<!-- m -->

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:31 am 
Been Cautioned
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:02 pm
Posts: 446
That's some post.

To think we have a nanny state under this shower.

Future missing children industry indeed!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:39 am 
Moderator

Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 7:46 pm
Posts: 1851
Is it really so hard to imagine, given the snippets that are starting to come out from Jersey? Just how high has that cover-up gone?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:46 am 
New In Town

Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:52 am
Posts: 13
Maybe,i think, it is a possibility.It would explain a lot of things.The whole protection of the government from the beginning .Ich can not believe this, but it always reminds more and more to the case in Belgium. :twisted:
Please look here:
<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130706/http://www.pehi.eu/dutroux/Belgian_X_do<!-- m --> ... affair.htm

_________________
The hope dies at last................
<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130706/http://youtube.com/watch?v=yz3HTefNxfc<!-- m -->


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:58 am 
Been Cautioned
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:02 pm
Posts: 446
Please be warned. This is very disturbing.

<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130706/http://www.pehi.eu/dutroux/Belgian_X_dossiers_of_the_Dutroux_affair.htm#privateintel<!-- m -->


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:04 am 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
bonnybraes1 wrote:
Is it really so hard to imagine, given the snippets that are starting to come out from Jersey? Just how high has that cover-up gone?


HI bonnybraes, could you please tell me more about what is happening in Jersey?

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:06 am 
New In Town

Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:52 am
Posts: 13
Zeppo wrote:

Indeed. It is terrible. Unbelievable. But....

_________________
The hope dies at last................
<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130706/http://youtube.com/watch?v=yz3HTefNxfc<!-- m -->


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous: <select name=st><option value=0 selected>All posts</option><option value=1>1 day</option><option value=7>7 days</option><option value=14>2 weeks</option><option value=30>1 month</option><option value=90>3 months</option><option value=180>6 months</option><option value=365>1 year</option></select> Sort by <select name=sk><option value=a>Author</option><option value=t selected>Post time</option><option value=s>Subject</option></select> <select name=sd><option value=a selected>Ascending</option><option value=d>Descending</option></select> <input class=btnlite type=submit value=Go name=sort>
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 276 posts ] Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 276 posts ] Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next
AuthorMessage
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:11 am 
Been Cautioned
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:02 pm
Posts: 446
Yes 'unbelievable'. :x


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:12 am 
Moderator

Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 7:46 pm
Posts: 1851
What is coming out is very nasty indeed. A former children's home on Jersey - in English, called The Rabbit Warren - is currently being searched by police. Eddie the cadaver dog, yes, that Eddie, had already found the remains of one child. He has indicated other hotspots. Police are needing help from structural engineers to get into hidden basements and tunnels.
Survivors of abuse at the home are turning up on TV., etc., in numbers.
They had tried to get help for years, but the matter was either denied or hushed up by the relevant authorities. An enormous scandal is about to break out. More information is coming to light all the time. Jersey is a very rich island.
That, estelle, is the bare bones of the Jersey case.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:25 am 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
bonnybraes1 wrote:
What is coming out is very nasty indeed. A former children's home on Jersey - in English, called The Rabbit Warren - is currently being searched by police. Eddie the cadaver dog, yes, that Eddie, had already found the remains of one child. He has indicated other hotspots. Police are needing help from structural engineers to get into hidden basements and tunnels.

Survivors of abuse at the home are turning up on TV., etc., in numbers.

They had tried to get help for years, but the matter was either denied or hushed up by the relevant authorities. An enormous scandal is about to break out. More information is coming to light all the time. Jersey is a very rich island.

That, estelle, is the bare bones of the Jersey case.


Thanks, bonnybraes. What a scandal it could be!

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 2:02 pm 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
I wish to give credit to Demeter for finding this article. I decided to place it here because I had some suspicions after reading it:

Jornal do Algarve 26/02

Original article at

<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://www.jornaldoalgarve.pt/artigos.a<!-- m --> ... umero=7317

Google translation (a polished translation will follow asap)

Taxista Maddie says it has carried on the Disappearance
.
2008-02-26 - "A taxi driver from Vila Real de Santo António warrant, in isolation, the Jornal do Algarve, have transported Maddie on 3 May last - the date of his disappearance - at 20h10 between the square of taxis, and Monte Gordo Apolo Hotel in Vila Real de Santo António. Far to to be ignored, Anthony Castile never tires of repeating this episode, which at the time reported to PJ, stressing its conviction that carried the child in his taxi disappeared in the English Ocean Club, Praia da Luz Account that Maddie came accompanied by a woman who appeared to be a mother and three men, one of which ensures that it appeared Robert Murat, who was seated beside him. The woman traveled in the back seat, between the two men, the colon, one of which was sitting Maddie, who dressed a pijama to be pink.

During the short journey of four miles, the only words he spoke, according to the taxi driver, were "How much?" "How much?" At the time to pay for the trip. Anthony Castile saw the group leave the taxi and enter a registration yellow, blue jeep, parked in the park of the hotel, which started immediately. The taxi driver even asked whether the group was staying there, having said that it was not. Desgostoso by, apparently, have not connected to their testimony, Castile says Anthony did not doubt that the child was English and believes that it will not have been killed in Portugal, recalling the possibility of having refugee in any of the yacht marina or have been transported abroad, in that time. Stresses that matter for investigation because Lagos is a little more than an hour of Monte Gordo with a period "dark" of two hours in research on the case, where it may fit this episode.

Recall that the case "Maddie" has already dropped the first responsibility of PJ of Portimão that investigated the disappearance and has, until now, made as defendants, parents, Kate and Gerry MacCann and Portuguese-English Robert Murat. Nearly ten months after his disappearance, the questions about the fate of the child, joins up now, this new evidence, reported in exclusive, our Newspapers. Anthony Castile is 67 years old, is a taxi driver for more than 17 and rated driver, at the local level."

My comments: I gather that David Payne sat in the front with Maddie on Gerry's lap in the back with Kate in the middle and O'Brien on the other side. I do predict that Maddie was in a pink dress not pyjamas.

The hotel link is here: <!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://www.apolo-hotel.com/default.aspx<!-- m -->

Other posters are discounting it as the timeframe does not support the abduction theory.

If you can agree with me that many reporters and witnesses get the dates wrong, then I would assume that this could have occurred on May 1 or April 30.

There was a high profile British Government Conference in the Algarve that week. I would suggest that on the Sunday or Monday, tapas4 drove to Vila Real de Santo António and parked the jeep. They spent part or all of the day with a high profile British Government paedophile in some sort of activity or while they were swinging themselves. I am not suggesting that this person or persons killed Maddie - only that IMO there could have been some paedophile activity that day not necessarily at this hotel. In the past, it had often been said that this paedo would have been staying in 5-star accommodation and that there is no way that he would have done anything in the McCann's apartment.

As soon as I read this article, my suspicious mind took over. I realise that this is pure speculation but I would like to know what other posters think.

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:44 pm 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
Friday December 3, 2004 See today's LifeSiteNews <!-- m -->storieshttp://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/ ... 20306.html<!-- m -->
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Erskine sent me this article which I find very worrying:

Doctorate Degree Awarded for Thesis Defending Pedophilia
LONDON, December 3, 2004 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Richard Yuill, awarded a doctorate degree from Glasgow University this week, argued in his doctoral thesis that sex between children and adults is sometimes a positive experience for the children.

The assumption has been challenged by sex abuse experts, who say the work could add fuel to the arguments of pedophiles who say that their abusive acts are consensual, and that they are not harming anyone.

"The conclusions are that in such relationships I think you've got the good, the bad and the ugly, and that's where I stand on that," Yuill said, as reported by the UK's ultra-liberal newspaper, The Guardian.

"Whatever his intention, one of the things we know about sexual offenders is that they seize on this kind of thing and use it to support their position," said Warwick University senior lecturer in social work, Chris Harrison.

Yuill, who referred to himself as a "boylover" in his interviews with pedophiles, says his work could challenge the UK law that prohibits sexual relations between adults and children under 16 years of age. Sex abuse experts and those who created the law say children are incapable of offering consent to sexual relations with an adult.

"The only thing I'm reporting is that the research findings do not concur with that overall picture," Yuill said. "A number of respondents would concur with the law ... but others found positive experiences or at least what I'd call neutral."

Glasgow University defended its decision to award the thesis. It argued that there was nothing criminal in Yuill's views.

Read Guardian coverage: <!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://www.guardian.co.uk/child/story/0,7369,1364313,00.html<!-- m -->

Read related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
Report: Canada A Haven For Pedophiles
<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2000/nov/00112005.html<!-- m -->

Action item: to read more about the conference and to get a copy of the
Declaration, go to:
<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://www.dicf.org.qa/english/documents/doha_declaration/in..<!-- m -->.

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Last edited by Estelle on Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:10 pm 
Moderator

Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 7:46 pm
Posts: 1851
Disgusting creature - and Glasgow University are no better for rewarding him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:18 pm 
First Time Offender
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 11:42 pm
Posts: 715
Location: UK - A haven for Dodgy Doctors
Sickening.

How on earth can somebody be awarded a Doctorate for disgusting comments saying that sex between adults and children can be a positive experience for children?

What sort of world do we have if the most vulnerable members of society are sexually abused and then those actions are condoned by Universities?

Right and wrong seem to have been turned upside down. Is there no protection for children? How can evil people be commended?

_________________
"Out damned spot ................" - Macbeth


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:31 pm 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
bonnybraes1 wrote:
Disgusting creature - and Glasgow University are no better for rewarding him.


Exactly!

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:32 pm 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
julygirl3210 wrote:
Sickening.

How on earth can somebody be awarded a Doctorate for disgusting comments saying that sex between adults and children can be a positive experience for children?

What sort of world do we have if the most vulnerable members of society are sexually abused and then those actions are condoned by Universities?

Right and wrong seem to have been turned upside down.

Is there no protection for children?

How can evil people be commended?


XXXXXXXXXXXXX

The values of British society are very disturbing, aren't they?

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:48 pm 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
Pedophilia Agenda - how it was advanced

<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://pedophilia-agenda.blogspot.com/<!-- m -->

Fully Launched in Belgium with Marc Dutroux, reached utter limits first in Portugal with the orphans of Casa Pia 10 years later.

Jul 13, 2007

German Teenager Marco Weiss jailed in Turkey - used to complete "legalize pedophila"

Several agendas involved

In Germany it has been the top story of EVERY illuminati media outlet (i.e. including the state TV) for the last three weeks. No wonder it gets almost the same media coverage as OJ Simpson story did in the US. It is an extremely useful story to advance or end several illuminati agendas.

Main agenda

The main agenda is the "Legalize Pedophilia" agenda (1). Why? Start here: this is no story in the UK. (2)

Other agendas

This TV broadcast illustrates how parts of the truth are revealed in order to advance other related agendas: the "terrorize the sheep" agenda, the "german government prefers the native germans" Hoax agenda, i.e. to sell better to the sheep the acceptance of the government policies for "mass immigration / open borders" or the "It does not matter what goes on in Turkey. It must join the EU, now deal with it" agenda (3).

Mind Control techniques used

The main mind control technique used is acceptance by association, like in the case of OJ Simpson, where the groups targeted by association were Blacks and anyone who admired the sports icon.

In this case the groups targeted by association are the German natives, the teenagers and their parents. (4)

Notes

(1) Some recent stories related to this agenda
Missing UK girl kidnapped in Portugal and Police Smash Global Pedophile Ring - HORRIBLE TRUTH: part of same script
<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://pedophilia-agenda.blogspot.co...-portugal.html/<!-- m -->


(2) The structure of this URL (as if it was supposed to be a Germany only story) says it all:
<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://www.guardian.co.uk/germany/ar...111531,00.html<!-- m -->

(3) TV report from July 12, state TV. Monitor plays the role of the only TV program denouncing some of the details about this case. In fact, like anything else shown in the illuminati media, it is broadcasted because overall it serves the illuminati agendas.
<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://www.wdr.de/themen/global/webm...400&b=002&ex=5<!-- m -->

(4) Paris Hilton "I'm too beautiful for jail" vs. OJ Simpson "He is too rich and famous for jail"
<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://illuminati-agenda.blogspot.co...-for-jail.html/<!-- m -->
In Forums
<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://www.goldismoney.info/forums/showthread.php?t=155233<!-- m -->

Jun 19, 2007

Missing UK girl kidnapped in Portugal and Police Smash Global Pedophile Ring - HORRIBLE TRUTH: part of same script
These two acts are part of the same script, authored by the Illuminati.
The "parents" of the "missing UK girl kidnapped in Portugal" are actors in the illuminati payroll.

The main goal of having the media and all kinds of illuminati "icons" (1) (icons for the human cattle) taking part in act 1 was to set the stage for the "news" released yesterday, six weeks later, about act 2.

The right questions

For a start:
- script in two acts - how are the two dots connected?
- staging: is there something new or is this simply a re-run, i.e. a simple upscale from previously staged cases?
- agenda: what illuminati agendas are served?
- mind control techniques used: what is Contents and what is Package?
- script location: why was Portugal chosen?

Answers - Main Agenda

Connecting the dots begins by identifying the main agenda served by the script.
It is the "Legalize Pedophilia" Agenda (2), which requires regular upscaling of other agendas. Two of them (3):

- "Destruction of protection of children" agenda.
- "Terrorize the Sheep" agenda.

Answers - Re-run, just upscaling
Both acts are repetitions broadcasted regularly by the media to implement the related Illuminati agendas.

Answers - "Package vs. Contents"
How Mind control technique "Package vs. Contents" (4) (aka Orwell's "Double Talk") was used in both acts is obvious.

Act 1: kidnapped Madeleine McCann missing.
Package: Illuminati (police, icons, media) do protect children.
Contents: agenda "Destruction of protection of children".
To parents: you can do whatever you want with your children, no reason to be afraid to be punished.
To pedophile rings: kidnap as many children as you want, there is nothing to fear from the police.To sheep: accept increasing number of missing children.

Act 2: Police Smash Global Pedophile Ring.

Package: Illuminati (police) do protect children.

Contents: same agenda as act 1, plus "Terrorize the Sheep" Agenda.
To parents: in case your child is kidnapped by a Pedophile Ring, resistence is futile, i.e. don't bother harassing the police because they do nothing about it.
To sheep: asking questions about children as sex slaves is futile. It is as normal as children going to school, deal with it.

Answers - Location
Beginning In the early nineties and staged for years, Belgium (Marc Dutroux) was the location used to full launch the "Legalize Pedophilia" agenda.
Beginning in 2002 and again staged taged for years, Portugal (orphans of state institution Casa Pia) was the location used to first push the "Legalize Pedophilia" agenda to the utter limits.

Notes
(1) Examples: "parents" meet the Pope or "David Beckham made a televised appeal for her release, and a British millionaire has offered 1 million pounds to anyone who finds Madeleine."
<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://en.epochtimes.com/news/7-5-12/55197.html<!-- m -->
More on Illuminati icons:
<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...inati+icons%22<!-- m -->

Illuminati enjoy "1 million" jokes for the people who God tells us should be the most protected: children and disabled. Two more of these horrible jokes, included in the ceremony of the post-acceptance of the mark, April 2005: Clinton Eastwood and Terri Schiavo, Auschwitz and the $1 million dollar hoax
<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://www.goldismoney.info/forums/showthread.php?t=19196<!-- m -->

(2) <!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...MattMarriott<!-- m -->

(3) Like for any other illuminati agenda, these agendas are used not only for the "Legalize Pedophilia" Agenda but also to advance other agendas.

(4) "Mind Control" Techniques
<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...s.+Contents%22<!-- m -->

(5) Illuminati jokes pushed to the utter horrible limits: June 18: "British police, with aid from U.S. investigators, rescuing 31 children ... being subjected to horrific sexual abuse—including streaming live videos" ....
<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://www.topix.net/world/portugal/2007/05/missing-uk-girl-kidnapped-in-portugal-police<!-- m -->

... downscaling from 32 murdered at Virgina Tech... NOT.
<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://us-state-terror.blogspot.com/2007/04/virgina-tech-911-upscaled-state-terror.html<!-- m -->

More articles published later
July 17 - J.K.Rowling & Harry Potter and the Illuminati Brainwash Children Agenda with photo - Satanic Jokes: J.K.Rowling helps in hunt for missing UK girl Madeleine
<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://www.goldismoney.info/forums/showthread.php?t=156537<!-- m -->

September 15, as the script is completed - The horrible yet simple Maddie McCann script: non-stop satanic jokes
<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://illuminati-jokes.blogspot.com/2007/09/horrible-yet-simple-missing-uk-girl.html<!-- m -->

In Forums

<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=68296<!-- m -->


Posted by MattMarriott at 2:15 PM 0 comments
Labels: agenda, children, Double Talk, illuminati, Legalize pedophilia, Madeleine, McCann, mind control, missing, Orwell, Package vs. Contents, parents, pedophile ring, portugal, terror, UK girl

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Last edited by Estelle on Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:50 pm 
Been Cautioned

Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 8:51 pm
Posts: 484
IMHO,there are no motives for government protection and I think,that if the evidence is compelling enough,this will go to trial.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:53 pm 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
fedrules wrote:
IMHO,there are no motives for government protection and I think,that if the evidence is compelling enough,this will go to trial.


What were the government's motives then for going out of their way to help the McCanns?

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:58 pm 
Been Cautioned

Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 8:51 pm
Posts: 484
Normal procedure in a case where a British citizen goes missing abroad,although I do think being 'middle class' doctors helped them,as did their various wealthy friends.However,they are not important enough to be protected if they do prove to be guilty and I don't think there are many politicians who would risk their careers to assist two child killers(if that's what they are)


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:02 pm 
New In Town
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:29 am
Posts: 30
Estelle thanks for posting those articles, I think they're interesting. I've always thought that this case has something to do with some high-level paedophile ring. Unfortunately it wouldn't be that unusual

<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302130711/http://www.socialequality.org.uk/iw/241/14a241.shtml<!-- m -->

I really wish I'm wrong :cry:


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:03 pm 
Been Cautioned
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:02 pm
Posts: 446
The government are around, although this case is helping them implement their politacal agenda. I don't think this has anything to do with protecting high up peadophiles imo.

What there is, is a peadophile, a stranger, who is dark and swarthy, foreign and untraceable. ????not


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous: <select name=st><option value=0 selected>All posts</option><option value=1>1 day</option><option value=7>7 days</option><option value=14>2 weeks</option><option value=30>1 month</option><option value=90>3 months</option><option value=180>6 months</option><option value=365>1 year</option></select> Sort by <select name=sk><option value=a>Author</option><option value=t selected>Post time</option><option value=s>Subject</option></select> <select name=sd><option value=a selected>Ascending</option><option value=d>Descending</option></select> <input class=btnlite type=submit value=Go name=sort>
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 276 posts ] Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 276 posts ] Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next
AuthorMessage
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 5:53 am 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
Zeppo wrote:
The government are around, although this case is helping them implement their politacal agenda. I don't think this has anything to do with protecting high up peadophiles imo.

What there is, is a peadophile, a stranger, who is dark and swarthy, foreign and untraceable. ????not


It is very rare for a stranger to abduct a child....usually a child is abducted by someone she knows and trusts.

Zeppo, I noticed that you seem to believe in a kidnap theory.

I believe that there could have been some pedophiliac activites earlier that week with somone known to the McCanns in return for protection.

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:26 am 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
Networked Knowledge - Media Reports

On 2 December 2007 Nick Fagge of the Daily Express reported “Madeleine: British Diplomat in Portugal had doubts about McCanns”.

He said a British diplomat warned the Foreign Office of concerns regarding Mad­eleine McCann’s parents, it emerged last night. Doubts about Kate and Gerry McCann were raised almost immediately by an official sent to Praia da Luz due to what he considered to be “inconsistencies” in the couple’s testimonies about the night the four-year-old vanished. The warning was contained in a classified document sent from the Algarve to the Foreign Office days after Madeleine’s disappearance. Details of the letter have been leaked through the British diplomatic mission in Brussels to the respected Belgian newspaper Derniere Heure.

The unnamed diplomat voices his concern about the “confused declarations” as to the whereabouts of Kate and Gerry McCann and their friends in the final hours before Madeleine’s disappearance. “Portuguese detectives believe it is possible Madeleine died as the result of an accident on May 3 in the family’s holiday apartment and that her parents hid and later disposed of her body with the help of their friends.

He also mentions the couple’s “lack of co-operation” with the Portuguese police in the light of instructions from London suggesting consular staff “overstretch their authority and put pressure on the Portuguese authorities”. The document also asks for confirmation of Diplomats oorders sent by the Foreign Office in London the day before, commanding embassy staff to give “all possible assistance to the McCann couple”. n the Algarve were told the McCanns had to be “accompanied at all times during any contact with the Portuguese police” by a member of consular staff or by British police officers sent out from the UK.

The letter, sent just days after Madeleine disappeared, warns of the risks of siding with the McCanns so completely. Excerpts published in a report by La Derniere Heure quote the diplomat as saying: “With the greatest respect, I would like to make you aware of the risks and implications to our relationship with the Portuguese authorities, if you consider the possible involvement of the couple. “Please confirm to me, in the light of these concerns, that we want to continue to be closely involved in the case as was requested in your previous ­message.” A huge team of diplomats have been involved in the case since Gerry McCann asked the Foreign Office for help.

In an unprecedented move, the then Prime Minister Tony Blair despatched special envoy Sheree Dodd, a former Fleet Street journalist, to Portugal to act as a “media liaison officer” for the McCann family. Direct government communications with the McCanns came to an abrupt halt, however, when the couple were made official suspects in the case in September. Portuguese detectives believe it is possible Madeleine died as the result of an accident on May 3 in the family’s holiday apartment and that her parents hid and later disposed of her body with the help of their friends. The couple have always said they had nothing to do with their daughter’s disappearance. The Belgian report says it is highly significant that almost all of the diplomats involved at the outset have now been taken off the case.

Special envoy Sheree Dodd has since resigned from the Foreign Office, the British consul in the Algarve Bill Henderson has retired and the British ambassador to Portugal John Buck is no longer in Portugal. Last night the Foreign Office refused to comment on the report.

Link: <!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302125215/http://netk.net.au/Madeleine/Madeleine51.asp<!-- m -->

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:40 am 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
Lib Dem hopeful behind McCanns' campaign
8th September 2007

PR expert Justine McGuinness: behind the McCanns campaign

The campaign by the McCanns to find their daughter has been masterminded during the past two months by public relations expert Justine McGuinness.

The 37-year-old former Lib Dem parliamentary candidate, who finished second to Conservative MP Oliver Letwin in the race for the West Dorset seat in the 2005 General Election, was selected by the McCanns via a headhunter.

She was chosen for the position specifically because of her background in politics and is paid a 'notional' salary from funds raised by the campaign.

Since taking up the post she has acted as the McCanns' personal spokeswoman and organised events to keep the hunt for Madeleine in the public eye.

These have included a succession of interviews and photocalls with the couple, and Gerry McCann's visit to Washington DC in July on a fact-finding mission about the latest techniques for tracking missing children.

But she has been criticised for adding to the sense that the campaign has become an overly slick, and cynical, PR operation.

Recently, she reportedly had to be dissuaded from arranging a photocall for Kate McCann at a Portuguese orphanage.

Prior to McGuinness's arrival in Praia da Luz, the McCanns' media handling was run, in an unprecedented move, by a team from the British Government.

To help the family cope with the enormous level of interest, first Sheree Dodd, a former Daily Mirror journalist, was dispatched to Portugal by the Foreign Office.

Then Clarence Mitchell, an ex-BBC news presenter now working as a senior government spin doctor, became the voice of the McCanns.


Link: <!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302125215/http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=480808&in_page_id=1770<!-- m -->

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:47 am 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
10 Questions for Gordon Brown with Regard to the McCanns 15/09/07

When and from whom did you first learn of the 'abduction'?

Why did you decide that this case was so different that you made the decision to dispatch government spin doctors, Sheree Dodd and Clarence Mitchel, to handle the media campaign?
This move was described by the Dail Mail as unprecidented.

How many British police officers have been involved in the investigation, and at what cost?

Is the McCann's campaign to have a sex offenders register in set up in Portugal official government policy?

Did you use diplomatic pressure to have the police release the Jane Tanner photofit?

How many times have you personally spoken to Gerry McCann?

Is you wife or her ex-business partner, Julia Hobsbawm, involved in the McCann's campaign?

Have the British police manipulated the evidence?

Why have social services seemingly treated the McCanns differently to other cases?

Why are you distancing yourself from the McCanns?

In May reports claimed that Gordon Brown had more than one telephone conversations with Gerry McCann. The latest statement says that Mr Brown only spoke to him once. And the press release from ultramarketing about the new PR team backing the McCann's makes no reference of Clarence Mitchell.

Link: <!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302125215/http://trannyfattyacid.blogspot.com/2007/09/10-questions-for-gordon-brown-with.html<!-- m -->

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 6:01 am 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
The McCann couple and a media storm

The story has provided the British media an intense test of modern, 24-hour, seven-day web-driven journalism.

Inside the drab, tile-clad police station in Portimao, Portugal, there is a television tuned to Sky News. Officers are monitoring the U.K. news network, which has mounted rolling coverage of the case they are investigating, for one reason: they want to know what the world is saying about them.

That explains the outrage 10 days ago, on the evening that Gerry and Kate McCann were declared formal suspects, or arguidos, in the disappearance of their daughter. Police were still questioning Gerry McCann when, already, his sister Philomena was telling Sky News they had offered Kate McCann a reduced two-year sentence if she admitted to killing her daughter accidentally, hiding the body, and then secretly disposing it of weeks later.

On this occasion the police officers were right to be angry. Like many things said about the McCann affair over the past days and months, the story was wrong. There was no offer of a plea bargain. It had all been “a misunderstanding,” the McCanns’ lawyer, Carlos Pinto de Abreu, explained the following day.

That did not mean, of course, that Philomena McCann — one of many people speaking for what might broadly be called “the McCann camp” — was wrong about the rest of it. Portuguese police do seem to be considering accidental death followed by disposal of the corpse as a possibility in this most bizarre of cases. In this story without on-the-record sources, however, they have not even publicly confirmed that much.

It now seems incredible, however, to recall that the McCanns started suing Portugal’s Tal & Qual magazine for saying just that a little over two weeks ago: Philomena McCann’s statement gave British journalists the green light to start reporting the allegations against the McCanns — even though, if they are found not guilty in any future trial, editors could be sued.

Insatiable appetite

The scene inside the police station helps explain something of the nature of what has become one of the world’s biggest media storms. The journalists watch the police, the police watch the journalists and the world watches them all — showing an insatiable appetite for even the flimsiest reports about the McCann case.

Stir into the mix the relentless demands of 24-hour rolling journalism and some bitter, nationalistic warfare between sections of the British and Portuguese press and you get a messy, and occasionally nasty, story.

“The British press … treats Portugal as a place full of incapable, careless incompetents,” complained Francisco Moita Flores in Correio da Manha after a recent round of criticism of the Portuguese police.

Frustration reigns among journalists covering the case. Everybody who knows anything worthwhile is bound by Portugal’s judicial secrecy laws not to talk. That includes the police, lawyers, court officials, the McCanns and almost anyone who has given evidence. That has not, of course, prevented the media providing a daily feast of “details.” So where do these come from?

Kate and Gerry McCann might not be able to talk, but their extended family and a network of friends can, and do. Philomena, with her colourful Glaswegian vocabulary and willingness to attack the police, is among the most quoted — but there are many more.

The Portuguese police also talk, though the few gruff words issued by official spokesman Chief Inspector Olegario de Sousa rarely add anything to the story. Like any police force, however, they leak — especially to Portuguese journalists. Unfortunately the things they leak are often contradictory. For every “police source” claiming the evidence against the McCanns is strong, for example, another is ready to say it is not.

The McCanns have their own favourite journalists. Gerry McCann, for example, likes Sky’s Ian Woods — who conducted the first television interview with them back in May. It was Sky who told the world the McCanns were leaving Portugal on September 9.

Although many commentators have professed amazement at the McCanns’ supposedly skilful media management, this has, at times, proved chaotic. It was naive, for example, to believe that the respect shown to them in the days immediately after four-year-old Madeleine vanished would hold.

In the early days the McCanns were allowed to set the rules for the press. They decided what happened, and when. The British media succumbed, largely, to a bout of communal sympathy. Police had said it was a kidnap. Robert Murat, an expatriate Briton, had been declared a formal suspect. He, as the McCanns do now, denied any involvement. That did not stop, however, pages and pages of muck-raking stories about him from appearing in newspapers in both Portugal and the U.K.

The McCanns’ early success with the press can be put down, in part, to the media experts they found working alongside them. The Mark Warner company, whose holiday apartments they had been staying in, already had a deal with PR company Bell Pottinger. That meant that Alex Woolfall, the company’s crisis management head, was in Praia da Luz the day after Madeleine disappeared. When Mr. Woolfall left 10 days later, the British Foreign Office stepped in. Media handlers arrived from London. They included former Daily Mirror journalist Sheree Dodd and, later, former BBC man Clarence Mitchell. Both Mr. Woolfall and Mr. Mitchell are remembered by reporters as key and immensely helpful sources as the McCann phenomenon took off.

After they left, however, things started going wrong. Portuguese newspapers started to publish unsympathetic stories at the end of June. As Portuguese journalists caught the mood music from police the relationship disintegrated further. Sandra Felgueiras, a feisty state television journalist obsessed by the family’s supposed use of Calpol, became a particular bete noire.

Some Portuguese commentators are aware that their press, like some of their British counterparts, have gone too far. “The crowd now wants the parents to be the murderers because they are British [and, therefore, not Portuguese] and so that the worst of the British press has to surrender to the worst of the Portuguese press and admit that the latter were right,” commented Mario Negreiros in Portugal’s Jornal de Negocios.

Justine McGuinness, the campaign manager who took over after Mr. Mitchell left, stood down from the job last week; she is understood to have been exhausted by the intensity of the campaign. The McCanns have talked to, among others, the former News of the World and Hello! editor Phil Hall about their future media needs, but seem to be finding it hard to hire a permanent replacement. Hanover PR, run by the former British Prime Minister, John Major’s former press secretary Charles Lewington, was taking calls over the weekend, but stressed it was not working for the McCanns permanently.

Global reach

It is hard to overestimate the global reach of the McCann story. The Associated Press, which rivals Reuters as the world’s biggest global news agency, took reporters away from a meeting of European Union Foreign Ministers in northern Portugal to cover the McCanns’ sudden change of fortune at Portimao police station.

The decision paid off. The AP story was the most-read story on many U.S. newspaper websites that day.

The strain on journalists in the Algarve has been immense. Working days have stretched for up to 18 hours or more. The McCann story has provided the British print media with the same test of modern, 24-hour, seven-day web-driven journalism as Virginia Tech gave their U.S. counterparts.

Editors at newspaper websites realised back in May that McCann stories quickly shot to the top of their “most read” rankings. The best summary of the McCanns’ current situation came from a Portuguese commentator, Joao Marques dos Santos of Correio da Manha. “The theory of the presumption of innocence for an arguido is a joke. When someone is declared an arguido, the exact opposite occurs. That person, whether innocent or not, is considered by investigators to be potentially guilty. The effects are devastating and irreparable.”

The media, said Mr. de Abreu, may be doing even more damage than that. “The media coverage could prejudice not just people’s reputations but also the investigation itself,” he told journalists last week. — ©Guardian Newspapers Limited, 2007

<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302125215/http://www.hindu.com/2007/09/18/stories/2007091856391100.htm<!-- m -->

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 6:09 am 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
Spinning for Maddie: the latest recruit

Why do the McCanns choose spin doctors not lawyers? And why so many?

This morning Clarence Mitchell will stand on the church steps in Rothley, Leicestershire, with Kate and Gerry McCann as their new official spokesman. He is the former Foreign Office spin doctor who helped the couple before and yesterday announced he was giving up his government job to act as their full-time advisor.

PR experts - whether privately funded or government-funded - have shadowed the McCann story since the moment Madeleine went missing in Praia da Luz on May 3. That is why everyone from David Beckham to Pope Benedict XVI, from Gordon Brown to Laura Bush, has been tapped up for support and influence. But how did it happen?

The couple's media campaign started by chance. One of the best crisis management PRs in the business, Alex Woolfall of Bell Pottinger, happened to be on hand from day one. He was employed by the Mark Warner

PR experts have shadowed the McCann story since the moment Madeleine went missing in Praia da Luz on May 3

It was Woolfall who acted as a bridge between the distraught McCanns and the arriving media hordes. Two weeks later, Woolfall stood down and the Foreign Office stepped in.

First to arrive in Portugal was a former Mirror journalist and long-term government spokesperson called Sheree Dodd. But Dodd was swiftly replaced by the more senior and bombastic figure of Clarence Mitchell, who took a pro-active role, orchestrating a visit to meet the Pope and a tour which took in Spain, Germany and Morocco.

But what was the hand of government doing meddling in the case? Mitchell was director of Whitehall's Media Monitoring Unit, a little-known department which scours the foreign media, collecting information that might be of interest to the government. Why did the McCanns need such a man to represent them? And anyway, why a spin-doctor rather than a good lawyer?

These are questions the Spanish daily

El Pais was still asking last week: "Why did the British crown offer to shield the McCanns and connect them up with political and religious leaders?"

The First Post put the question to the Foreign Office yesterday. "We stepped in," said a spokesman, "because of the exceptional media interest and to support the McCanns in the circumstances they found themselves in.

"Our role is more of a welfare role but we can act as first point of contact for the media if requested," he said. He added that even if there had been suspicions about the McCanns' involvement in their daughter's disappearance at an earlier stage, "we would have supported them as British nationals".

Mitchell was eventually pulled back at the end of June, according to the FO, "when the case entered a different phase. The McCanns wanted to look more at a campaign".

The McCanns will launch a billboard campaign to swing the focus back from questions about their culpability to the hunt for a missing girl to the Find Madeleine fund. During her tenure the hunt for Madeleine turned into a gossip-fest about the McCanns' possible involvement in the child's disappearance.

With McGuinness replaced by Mitchell - paid for not by the Find Madeleine Fund but by unnamed 'financial backers' - the McCanns will now launch an £80,000 billboard campaign in Spain and Portugal in an effort to swing the focus back from questions about their culpability to the hunt for a missing girl.

But will the public - more important, will the press - change tack so easily? Matthew Parris, writing in the Spectator, cautioned that the hack pack don't like it when the puppet strings are wrenched from their grasp. A slick, controlled, managed campaign frustrates and irritates those with a more investigative thirst for the story.

"They [the McCanns] have appeared to have been marketing their own tragedy. And it is we who market the tragedy around here," he wrote, speaking for all journalists. "Here's a tip. Don't try to manage at all. Or, if you must, don't let it show."

FIRST POSTED SEPTEMBER 18, 2007 <!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302125215/http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/?storyID=8702<!-- m -->

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 6:22 am 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
Public face of McCanns' campaign moves on 17 September 2007

JUSTINE MCGUINNESS, the public face of the Madeleine campaign over the past three months, has finished working for Kate and Gerry McCann.

Commenting on her departure on Saturday, Gerry McCann said: “Kate and I would like to thank Justine for all her hard work over the past 89 days, commitment and professionalism. We will remain friends and wish her all the best in the future.”

The 37-year-old former Lib Dem parliamentary candidate, who finished second to Conservative MP Oliver Letwin in the race for the West Dorset seat in the 2005 General Election, was selected by the McCanns via a headhunter.

She was chosen for the position because of her background in politics and was paid wha6t has been described as a notional salary from funds raised by the Find Madeleine campaign.

She has acted as the McCanns' personal spokeswoman and organised events to keep the hunt for Madeleine in the public eye.

These have included numerous interviews and photocalls plus Gerry McCann's fact finding visit to Washington DC in the US in July.

Before her arrival in Praia da Luz, the McCanns' media handling was run by a team from the British Government.

To help the family cope with the enormous level of interest in the early days of Madeleine’s disappearance, Sheree Dodd, a former Daily Mirror journalist, was sent to Portugal by the Foreign Office.
Then Clarence Mitchell, an ex-BBC news presenter now working as a senior government spin doctor became the voice of the McCanns.

David Hughes who was recently appointed to help Justine and whom was constantly at their side during the couple’s last few weeks in the Algarve, acted as Kate and Gerry McCann’s spokesperson over the weekend and on Monday this week.

A statement from the McCann camp on Monday said it is anticipated that a new spokesman will be announced shortly.


<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302125215/http://portugalresident.com/portugalresident/showstory.asp?ID=21446<!-- m -->

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 6:29 am 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia

Block on statements in Madeleine case 19 September 2007


FURTHER PUBLIC statements about the Madeleine McCann case are now under the control of the authority that governs Portugal’s judges. Statements will in future be controlled by the Conselho Superior de Magistratura (CSM).

Pedro Frias, the judge currently preparing the Madeleine case, had asked the CSM to explain to the media the legal procedures surrounding the case.

The CSM responded by saying there is no new information about the case that can justify further statements at the moment.

In an official statement, the CSM emphasised that the Madeleine case is still in the investigation stage and that the judge’s role is to ensure the absolute respect for the rights of those who are involved in the investigations, including victims, witnesses and suspects.

<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302125215/http://portugalresident.com/portugalresident/showstory.asp?ID=21454<!-- m -->

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:14 am 
Suspect

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 6:34 pm
Posts: 158
Clarence Mitchell was at the scene right from the word Go – Did he know the McCanns personally before the incident?

An investigation should be held to question the Government on its unusually high level involvement.

• Why was tax-payers’ money spent dispatching British Consulate, spokesperson, advisor, as well as an array of High Officials to protect two middle class citizens who were careless with their children in the first place? If, the reason is purely to assist British Citizens overseas, then why wasn’t Murat granted same level of assistance?

• The involvement of the UK Government spanned two leaders: Blair & Brown because of the transitional period. Why the abnormal amount of interest by both leaders shown to this couple?

• Why did Brown involve himself personally by discussing the McCann (unofficial matter) with Portuguese Government during an Official Visit even after a memo been circulated to him reporting testimonies inconsistence of the events indicated case might not be as seemed.

• Why Civil Servants who were involved resigned, sacked, or moved?

• What happened to that memo?

• Why controlled the Press & Media Freedom of Speech?

The UK Government actions leave lots of questions opened and should be made to answer taxpayers for wasting their money unnecessarily.

IMO, it may well be simply the case of assisting two medical professionals who happened to have some connection to the Government. I don’t think Pedophile is involved. Pedophile and Gay connections had caused the collapse of Governments so they would be stupid in the extreme to involve themselves in a Pedophile case!!

Nonetheless UK Govt. role and its intervention in the McCann’s case need to be investigated.

The problem is who is going to carry out the investigation on the Govt ; and be permitted freedom of speech to put info in public domain. The hands of mainstream media are tied by the very people we want investigated!!

P.S. Estelle, Excellent output. You’d worked very hard (harder than G. Brown)!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:17 am 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
British consul arrives at PJ headquarters 07 September 2007

BRITISH CONSUL Celia Edwards has arrived at the PJ headquarters in Portimao as Kate McCann continues to be questioned after being made a formal suspect in her daughter's disappearance.

A large crowd, some whistling and jeering, greeted Kate McCann as she arrived this morning. Husband Gerry McCann is due at the headquarters later this afternoon to be interviewed separately.

Speaking on behalf of the McCanns, Justine McGuinness said Portuguese police suggested to Kate that traces of Madeleine's blood were found in a car the family hired 25 days after the girl went missing.

Kate McCann told them there was "no way" Madeleine's blood could have been found inside the car and she continues to protest her innocence.

Tests have also been carried out on specks of blood from the apartment where Madeleine went missing on May 3.

Mrs McCann's lawyer, Carlos Pinto de Abreu, has advised her there is "a possibility" she may be charged in connection with her daughter's death.

"The police are treating Kate as if she is involved in the death of her daughter,” said Justine McGuinness. “"That suggestion hasn't been put to Gerry, so they are treating them differently. It is a ridiculous suggestion."

<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302125215/http://portugalresident.com/portugalresident/showstory.asp?ID=21265<!-- m -->

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:21 am 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
HOW MUCH HAVE KATE AND GERRY COST THE UK TAXPAYER ?

We read that the public relations services supplied to the McCanns by the UK government were at least £12,000 and that was just for Clarence Mitchell (a former BBC News presenter now working as a senior government spin-doctor), and Sheree Dodd (a former Daily Mirror journalist and long-serving senior spokeswoman for the Government). They must of also had the back up of numerous civil servants. We also have to consider the cost of our Police forensics and DNA tests in Birmingham having to produce evidence. When we add up additional consular support and any other little bits of assisstance, how much have the McFrauds cost the British Taxpayer ? Note of caution - I would not include any of the costs spent DIRECTLY looking for Madeleine, such as the official Government poster at airports/seaports etc Source: <!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302125215/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article2409958.ece<!-- m -->

There is probably also the question of how much they have cost the Portuguese taxpayer, but thats a question for the Portuguese YA (if they had one) Bangkok, suvarnabhumi.

<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302125215/http://www.bangkok-airport-link.com/bangkok-mccanns-how-much-have-kate-and-gerry-cost-uk-taxpayer-suvarnabhumi-9464.html<!-- m -->

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:45 am 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
Madeleine: British diplomats 'were told to avoid offering support to Murat' 12th December 2007

Robert Murat received far less consular support than the McCanns because of his suspect status, it is alleged British diplomats were ordered to "avoid offering support" to Madeleine McCann suspect Robert Murat, it was claimed today.

The Foreign Office sent a memo to staff with the instruction three days after the 34-year-old was named a formal suspect in the case, it was said.

The treatment expat Murat received contrasts starkly with the support Gerry and Kate McCann were offered by the British authorities, Spanish newspaper El Mundo reported.

Murat's lawyer Francisco Pagarete said: "He feels he has been abandoned by his own government.


"This extremely serious order confirms the lack of support which the family has felt since the beginning."

The lawyer added: "He does not oppose in any way the support which has been given to the McCanns".

El Mundo claims a Foreign Office document, dated May 17, justified the order because of "the specific nature of the case" and because British diplomats "were already helping Madeleine McCann's parents."

The paper reported: "An internal document, sent by the Foreign Office of the United Kingdom, orders British diplomats 'to avoid offering support' to Robert Murat, one of the suspects in the Maddie case, unless charges are presented against him."

British Ambassador to Portugal John Buck joined the McCanns in the Algarve shortly after Madeleine vanished from the family's rented holiday apartment in Praia da Luz.

Madeleine McCann

Three family liaison officers from Leicestershire Police also flew to the area to assist the couple, both 39-year-old doctors from Rothley, Leicestershire.

And ten days later the Foreign Office sent press officers Sheree Dodd and Clarence Mitchell to Praia da Luz to help with the media.

El Mundo claims Robert Murat's only support was a meeting with two low ranking diplomats some weeks after he was named as a suspect.

His mother Jenny, 71, tried but failed to arrange a meeting with British Embassy staff, it said.

In desperation she travelled to the UK to speak with her local MP, complaining of a lack of support from the British authorities.

The MP contacted the Foreign Office and met two diplomatic staff from the Algarve.

The MP was assured Robert Murat would receive the same support given to the McCanns, but only if he was formally charged, the newspaper reported.

Two MPs plan to raise the issue of the different standards of support in Parliament in January, lawyer Francisco Pagarete claims.


Robert Murat denies any involvement in Madeleine's disappearance. He was named an "arguido" or formal suspect after a British newspaper reporter told police she believed he was acting strangely.

Portuguese police believe Madeleine's parents helped dispose of her body after she died by accident in the Ocean Club holiday flat.

Forensic tests have proved inconclusive and police sources have admitted they do not have enough evidence to charge the couple.

The McCanns deny any involvement in their daugher's disappearance and insist she was abducted.

Police reportedly believe Robert Murat may have helped the McCanns cover up the crime.

A police source told Portuguese newspaper 24 Horas: "We know that Robert Murat knew the McCanns and we have several witnesses who place him in the area at the time Madeleine disappeared.

"But there is no decisive sighting, and no evidence other than the witnesses. It will be difficult to prove his involvement in the case, as well as his relationship with the McCanns.

"And even the witnesses are weak or contradictory. It will take a miracle to solve the case."

Robert Murat insists he was at home with his mother at the time Madeleine disappeared and that he had never met the McCanns.

Private detectives working for the Gerry and Kate McCann have put Murat and his German girlfriend Michaela Walczuch at the centre of their investigation.

Spanish agency Metodo 3 are investigating alleged sightings of Michaela, 32, with a girl matching Madeleine's description after the she disappeared.

Ms Walczuch vigorously denies any involvement in Madeleine's disappearance and has described claims she was involved as "ridiculous". Today 24 Horas said police do not consider Michaela a suspect and have no evidence linking her to the case.

Several witnesses have placed her at a Jehovah's Witnesses meeting between 8pm and 10.15pm on the night Madeleine went missing, it was said.

A police source told the paper: "There is no evidence. She was interrogated because she had links with the suspect (Murat) and a worker at the Ocean Club, who as a matter of fact was also interviewed. But so far nothing links her to the case."

<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302125215/http://news.homesandproperty.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=501440&in_page_id=1770&in_page_id=1770&expand=true<!-- m -->

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 9:24 am 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
Child abuse: Jersey; Kincora; North Wales; Dunblane; Islington February 25, 2008

Edward Paisnel, the Beast of Jersey, was the son of wealthy Jersey landowners.

During the period 1958 - 1971, Paisnel abducted and abused a number of children.

Paisnel was a fan of the 15th-century Breton, Gilles de Rais, who murdered around 200 children.

The authorities discovered that Paisnel had a secret satanic chamber. (Sir Peter Crill obituary - Times Online)

Paisnel claimed he was a member of a satanic group. File: /files/Religion/Wicca/witchcraftDeviltry.txt

No other members of the 'black magic group' were ever arrested.

In 1971, Paisnel was convicted of thirteen sex offences against young children, ( The Human Beast ) and sent to jail.

Paisnel, the Beast of Jersey, visited Jersey's Haut de la Garenne orphanage dressed as Father Christmas during his reign of terror in the 1960s (Notorious paedophile dubbed the 'Beast of Jersey' linked to ...)

1. February 24, 2008: It was reported that Jersey Police had found a child's remains at a former children's home in Jersey. Detectives said they expected to discover more bodies at the former Haut de la Garenne home in St Martin.

"The three-month investigation into child abuse at several government institutions on the island took a harrowing turn with the discovery yesterday morning of the partial remains, believed to date from the 1980s." - Body found amid fears of child abuse ring on Jersey

"Jersey’s Health Minister was sacked after he blew the whistle on a harsh punishment regime in a home where children as young as 11 were kept in solitary confinement.

"Stuart Syvret, the island’s longest-serving and most popular senator, had accused ministers, civil servants and social workers of failing to protect children but he was forced out this week after losing a vote of confidence in Jersey’s parliament, the States.

"He claimed to have been defeated by the “one-party oligarchy” of the Jersey establishment." - Minister Sacked After Exposing Child Abuse

"One man who was in the home for several years in the 1960s told how his 14-year-old best friend, Michael Collins, ran away from the home and was found hanged from a tree."

"Remains discovered five years ago were dismissed as animal bones and disposed of, despite being found in close proximity to children’s shoes." - paedophile was known to visit children’s home

"Jersey Police, following up a series of convictions for sexual offences involving officers from the island's Sea Cadet Corps, say they began to notice links between victims in those cases, and a number of island institutions, including Haut de la Garenne. (BBC NEWS World Europe Jersey Investigating Jersey's 'abuse ...)

"It’s alleged child abuse has been concealed in the area for many years and the trail could lead right to the top of Jersey’s citizens." - Jersey's Chief Minister Deny Claims Children Were Murdered at ...

The police officer heading the Jersey child abuse inquiry is Lenny Harper, who comes from Northern Ireland.

Harper is a former RUC (Northern Ireland Police) officer. - Endemic abuse at home: ex-RUC officer

The police and MI5 are alleged to have links to child abuse in Northern Ireland.

2. aangirfan: Kincora Boys

"For years, MI5 had been aware of a homosexual vice ring operating within the Kincora Boys Home in East Belfast, which was run by William McGrath, a notorious homosexual....

"McGrath... was employed by MI5 since the mid 1960s.

"Amongst various other Loyalist members of the homosexual ring were John McKeague, who ran the Loyalist paramilitary organisation, the Red Hand Commandos, which was involved in many sectarian killings...

"So, MI5 allowed the ill-treatment and sexual abuse of residents at the Kincora Boys Home to continue..."

3. "The role of MI5 sponsored boys homes/abuse circles in Kincora, Northern Ireland, Dunblane, Scotland and probably Cardiff mirrors on a smaller scale the systematic role that State- sponsored child abuse has played in the centres of power in the US and Brussels."- portland imc - 2007.05.11 - Scotland’s May 2007 Election Fiasco

4. "Scallywag Magazine alleged that MI5 used to take foreign diplomats to the North Wales homes, give them boys to 'play' with, secretly filmed them as they buggered, abused and tortured boys then kept the tapes as evidence.

Over a dozen victims who complained of abuse by the paedophile ring 'have met suspicious deaths'." - North Wales paedophile ring, top people, the police and the security services

Now defunct magazine Scallywag covered events at Bryn Alyn in detail

October 1997 (PUBLIC FIGURES NAMED IN PAEDOPHILE RING By Nick Davies 1997) :

"Policemen, social workers and prominent public figures have been accused of belonging to a paedophile ring which indulged in a relentless campaign of physical and sexual abuse in children's homes in North Wales.

"The names of the alleged members of the ring have been given by witnesses in public sessions of the North Wales Child Abuse Tribunal, but they have been suppressed by the tribunal's chairman, Sir Ronald Waterhouse QC, who has threatened the media with High Court proceedings if they print them.

"The Guardian today publishes for the first time detailed evidence about the alleged ring, which is said to have been based in Wrexham, and to have infiltrated local children's homes over a 20 year period.

"Witnesses claim that members of the ring used their connections with police and social services to conceal their activities. All of the accused have denied the allegations.

"Those named to the tribunal include:

"A man who bears the same surname as a prominent Conservative supporter. Two witnesses have told the tribunal of a rich and powerful man who belonged to the alleged ring.

"The son of an influential peer who admitted to police that he had been having sex with an under-age boy from one of the homes. Despite his admission, he was never prosecuted.

"A powerful public official who has previously been cleared of abuse. Six witnesses have given separate accounts to the tribunal of his alleged rape of young boys. Another has reported him attending parties in Wrexham which were supplied with boys from a children's home.

"Two social workers and two police officers, one of whom was accused of abuse on four separate occasions and exonerated each time, another of whom has since been jailed in another part of the country for gross indecency with a child.

"More than a dozen other local men, including an executive with a local authority, a senior probation officer and a director of a major company."

5. "I believe that Hamilton was a major provider of pornographic photographs and videos to a ring of men prominent in Central Scotland, including police officers who protected him from numerous allegations of physical abuse at boys' camps and clubs he ran." - aangirfan: Dunblane

6. Margaret Hodge (née Margaret Oppenheimer) was linked to the alleged cover up of a pedophile scandal. In 2003, Hodge was appointmented as Minister for Children by Tony Blair.

October 6 1992: The Evening Standard began a series of reports alleging that dozens of children at two Islington council homes were abused.

Hodge accused the Standard of "gutter journalism" and rejected its dossier on paedophile activity in the homes.

October 23 1992Margaret Hodge stepped down as council leader.

May 23 1995: An independent inquiry led by the director of Oxford social services found that the council failed to properly investigate the sexual abuse allegations. <!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302125215/http://society.guardian.co.uk/children/story/0,1074,1087250,00.html<!-- m -->

Allegations of child abuse at the Islington children's home were borne out by official inquiries.

7. In a number of Leicester children's homes, between 1973 and 1986, various adults were involved in sexual abuse of children. (Uncovering The Past Abuse of Children in Care ).

These were homes run by Frank Beck. At his trial in 1991, Beck was found guilty of 17 counts of physical and sexual abuse.

There was a Police Complaints Authority investigation into why so many of the complaints made to police by children had been ignored.

8. Quarriers Homes, Nazareth House and St Ninians in Scotland - An independent report for the Scottish government found that there has been massive child abuse in Scottish care homes. (Scotland’s shame )

The Herald, 23 November 2007, provides the details (‘These are the voices that need to be heard’) :

"When she was nine - or thereabouts - she (Elizabeth McWilliams) was raped by the man Quarriers called her house father. 'He took his chance,' she said matter-of-factly.

"Some children complained of abuse. That had consequences. 'Boys,' she said. 'Well, they were hung up on door hangers and their penises tied to doorhandles.'"

Quarriers Homes is a Christian community.

Helen Holland was sent to Nazareth House in Kilmarnock, a children's home run by nuns.

At Nazareth House Helen was raped by a priest.

"When she was eight, a nun pulled a hood over her head to help a priest rape her. The sexual abuse went on for three years until, aged 11, she fell pregnant. The same nun kicked her in the stomach until she miscarried."

She was 'beaten to a pulp' by a nun.

There was abuse at many other homes (The landmark cases: abuse in children's homes )

At St Ninians: "In 2003 Michael Murphy, 69, formerly known as Brother Benedict, a monk with the de la Salle order, was jailed for two years on ten charges of physical abuse during the 1960s, including torturing pupils with an electric shock device, force-feeding them vomit and whipping them with knotted boot laces."

9. Moira Anderson
11-year-old Moira Anderson was last seen boarding a bus in Coatbridge, near Glasgow, Scotland, in 1957.

She was on her way to the shops to buy a box of chocolates for her mum’s birthday.

According to The Sunday Times (Pressure on police to release paedophile dossier), 23 April 2006, Strathclyde Police have a dossier listing members of a child-abuse ring.

This dossier may identify the people who kidnapped Moira.

The dossier is said to implicate senior public figures, including senior police officers and members of the Crown Office and former Scottish Office.

These public figures are said to have abused children in Strathclyde (the Glasgow area) during the 1950s and 1960s.

The dossier is said to list vehicles and safe houses used in Glasgow, Monklands and Paisley where children were hidden before being taken to sex parties.

Strathclyde police have decided not to release the dossier.

The dossier was written by James Gallogley, a convicted child-abuser who died in Peterhead prison in 1999.

10. 02/24/2008 - by anonfrombackthen (Police in abuse probe find child remains on Jersey [UK])

"After having spent six months in solitary confinement, in a cell with unbrakeable glass, feeling extremely vulnerable without clothes, knowing that anyone could look through the magnified peephole on the door at any time, (and they did too! cos I could hear them and saw their shadows come and go), I learnt to comply.

"There was no recreation during that time in the cell. I was locked up 24 hours a day for the whole of the six months. Yet I wasnt a criminal. I just didnt get on with my parents, so I took them to court for mental and physical cruelty.

"Of course, they won cos they could afford a solicitor. I couldnt and I would proven uncontrollable and given the choice of going to live with one of my sisters who were married or to go in the home. I didnt think it fair on my sisters cos they all had young families, so I chose the home.

"The six months in solitary was my introduction to Haut de la Garenne. The only contact I had with the outside world in that time was with a member of staff who insisted in supervising my showers and bathroom visits."

According to a report in The Daily Mail, 17 May 2007, a "secret chamber" was found in Robert Murat's home. (Madeleine: Police swoop on Russian computer expert's flat the ... )

Marc Dutroux had a dungeon in one of his houses.

"In 'Beyond the Dutroux Affair', it was described how a cabal of highest level players, including judges, lawyers, top bankers, prime ministers and aristocrats were involved in child abuse and snuff networks (going right up to Bilderberg and the Nazi Stay-Behind networks).

"It was also described how this cabal could place their own investigators in leading positions of the child abuse investigations and dismantle it by blocking important inquiries, putting detectives on false leads, and making carefully planned leaks to friendly newspapers." - BriansDreams.com

From The Daily mail:

"As well as growing fears that Madeleine was abducted by a paedophile ring, they (the parents) can have little hope of justice when leading Portuguese figures are allegedly involved in covering-up their own child sex scandal.

"Both cases [Casa Pia and McCann] - the two highest profile criminal investigations in the country since the end of the Portuguese military dictatorship in 1974 - have been driven by allegations of compromised police officers, high-level interference and vicious, virulent attacks on key witnesses." - Why Portugal is a haven for paedophiles - the disturbing backcloth ...

Madeleine McCann went missing on 3 May 2007.

The Bilderberg meetings began near Istanbul on 31 May 2007.

(List of delegates at Bilderberg 2007, Istanbul, Turkey (May 31 ...)

David James Smith, in The Sunday Times (UK), 16 December 2007, (Kate and Gerry McCann: Beyond the smears) wrote about the Madeleine McCann case:

"I heard that a PJ officer had been surprised to find a member of MI5 at a UK meeting about the case, and this made him suspicious that shadowy forces could be at work.

"The Sol journalist Felicia Cabrita mentioned the 'mysterious Clarence' – Clarence Mitchell, the former government PR officer turned McCann spokesman – and I was told there was suspicion too about another government official, Sheree Dodd, who had acted as a PR officer for the McCanns briefly in the early days..."

Michel Nihoul was the person who allegedly organised orgies in a Belgian chateau.

These Orgies allegedly were attended by a former European commissioner, judges, senior politicians, lawyers and policemen.

Nihoul was one of the accomplices of Marc Dutroux.

Regina Louf testified to the authorities about orgies at which she allegedly saw children tortured and murdered.

The allegation in the the book called 'The X-files: What Belgium Was Not Supposed to Know About the Dutroux Affair' is that, at Black masses, attended by members of Belgium's elite, children were sacrificed.

(The investigation BBC News CORRESPONDENT EUROPE Belgium's X-Files: an Olenka ... BBC NEWS Programmes Correspondent Europe Belgium's X Files ...)

In 1996, at the village of Forchies-la-Marche, the police investigated an institute of Black Magic. They dug up human skulls. (The Irish press coverup of the Marc Dutroux Murders!)

The International Herald Tribune( Belgium Pedophilia Scandal /Did Authorities Cover Up Its Scope ... ) quoted Guy Poncelet as saying the X-files book was convincing.

Guy Poncelet is a judge. His son, a police officer, was mysteriously shot dead.

This son had been investigating a case involving Dutroux.

Judge Connerotte was the judge who caught Dutroux.

The authorities removed Connerotte from the case.

Patriek De Baets was the official in charge of investigating the X-files. The authorities removed him from the case.

In 1991, Belgium's former deputy prime minister, Andre Cools, announced that he was about to make some revelations about the mafia and their links to some of the most important people in Liege.

"Cools had most imprudently announced to the Belgian press... that he would soon release startling evidence about corruption in Belgium's growing arms industry and its ties to the Canadian billionaire Bronfman brothers, a number of major U.S. political figures and republican fat cats with influence reaching into the inner circles of the Bush White House.

"Among the names that Cools promised to present evidence on were Dick Cheney, Neil Bush, Frank Carlucci, Donald Rumsfeld and members of the powerful Republican Barbour and Racicot clans who all own large shares in major arms manufacturers as well as Britain's Jonathan Aitken, Thatcher's secretary of state for defense who had large holdings in a string of British arms suppliers and was a leading figure in the Tory Party hierarchy." - (Conspiracy Planet - Whistleblower: Oswald LeWinter - Bush-Cheney ...)

Cools was shot dead. Before he could speak out.

After Dutroux's arrest in 1996, arrests were made in the Cool's case.

One of those arrested was Alain Van der Biest, a Socialist Minister, alleged to have close links with the mafia gangs of Liege.

Belgian TV came up with an anonymous witness who claimed that leading Socialist politician, Guy Mathot, had ordered Cools to be killed.

In 1994 Mathot was charged with corruption over kickbacks paid to Belgium's Socialist parties.

Willy Claes was NATO Secretary General and a Belgian. He was caught up in the Mathot kickbacks thing and was forced to resign.

Melchior Wathelet was top judge who released Dutroux from prison in 1991.

Wathelet was Belgium's judge at the European Court of Justice.

Wathelet was Belgium's Justice Minister at the time when Cools was shot dead.

Cools' son called for Wathelet and other top judges to be removed from office.

In 1996 there were suggestions that the gangs involved in the Cools' killing had been involved with Dutroux.

According to an article by OSWALD LEWINTER, at Conspiracy Planet, (Conspiracy Planet - Whistleblower: Oswald LeWinter - Bush-Cheney ...):

The discovery of computer discs at Dutroux's house, in 1996, "unraveled an international pedophile ring involving Belgium, the Netherlands, Portugal, the U.S., Great Britain, Japan and the United Nations and its agencies.

"The names found on the computer disks reached into the highest levels of politics and society in the various countries and institutions, including some of the very members of the Belgian government who had originally been implicated in the assassination of Andre Cools.

"By arresting Dutroux, the Belgian authorities were simultaneously able to round up many of the people responsible for the assassination of Cools.

"In the interim, Dutroux led police to the burial site of four young girls, all of whom had been ritually murdered by his pedophile colleagues.

"Within a short time, over 30 people had been arrested, including a number of high-level politicians, judges, and senior police commanders.

"The prosecuting judge in the Dutroux case was Jean-Marie Connerrote, the same judge who had been dismissed from the Cools murder case before he could issue indictments.

"Among those he arrested in August 1996, and charged in the Cools murder, was Alain Van der Biest, a leading member of the Belgian Socialist Party and a one-time political ally of Cools and a shareholder in PRB...

"The judge also arrested two Italian Mafia leaders linked to the imprisoned 'capo di tutti capi', Salvatore 'Toto' Riina and his longtime 'capo-regime' Giovanni 'the Pig' Brusca, who had played a prominent role in the Cools killing.

"[Riina, head of the Corleone crime syndicate, had been jailed in 1993 despite the fact that he had been a covert asset of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, who had helped the DEA, together withTomasso Buscetta, to make a case against his rival Gaetano Badalamenti in the famous 'Pizza Connection' case.]...

"Dutroux... was closely tied to a senior Portuguese diplomat, Jorge Ritto, a former ambassador to South Africa and Permanent Representative to UNESCO who is a close friend of the agency's Secretary General, Koiichiro Matsura.

"Ritto has been implicated and jailed as a major figure in Portugal's Casa Pia pedophilia scandal.

"Another leading figure dredged up in the widening circle of the Dutroux pedophilia operation, Jean Michel Nihoul, managed the group's finances out of posh offices on the Avenue de Louise in the heart of the Brussels business district.

"He managed a string of Dutroux's properties which functioned as pedophilia clubs in various countries, including a sumptuous and secluded villa in the Caribbean at which leading U.S. political figures, governors and members of Congress could satisfy their pedophile perversions safe from media sleuths.

"Nihoul had been in and out of jail since the 1970's, on a wide range of money-laundering, drug-trafficking, and prostitution charges.

"He was also a leading power in Belgian right-wing political circles, a close friend of U.S. General John Singlaub and Rev. Moon of the World Anti-Communist League as well as to men in the upper echelons of the Sasakawa Foundation.

"Nihoul was also a power in Belgium's Christian Social Party.

"In the 1980's, Nihoul ran an ecology cult, called Eco Vie, through which he became friends for a time with the late Pym Fortuyn, a Dutch politician who was murdered.

"The organization itself served as a front for many of Nihoul's criminal activities.

"Nihoul was also involved in the earlier 'L'Affaire Pinon' a series of pedophile orgies managed by the wife of Dr. Pinon.

"The Nihoul expose raised fears among some of the Belgian elites, that the pedophile indictments would force the reopening of an earlier case, involving the 7th January 1986 murder of a Juan Mendez of Fabrique Nationale.

"Mendez was responsible for providing false 'end-user certificates' for shipments of arms destined for for Iran, Iraq, and several African countries on the United Nations' arms embargo list.

"The Dutroux-Nihoul case also sparked a revival of interest in a parallel case unearthed in the United States, as part of the late 1980s Congressional and special prosecutors probes of the Contra Supply operations.

"The American case involved CIA- Col. Oliver North initiated drugs-for money-for weapons operation, and also the Franklin Credit Bank of Omaha, Nebraska,run by Larry King, a powerful African-American Republican Party operator, whose savings and loan institution was used to launder funds for Oliver North's Contras.

"When former Nebraska state senator John De Camp undertook a probe of King's activities , he uncovered a nationwide pedophile ring, servicing some of the wealthiest and most powerful figures in the Omaha business and political elites in the Republican Party circles of George Herbert Walker Bush (see 'The Franklin Cover-Up, Child Abuse, Satanism and Murder in Nebraska,' by John W. De Camp,{Lincoln Nebraska: AWT, Inc., 1992}).

"On October 14, 1996, the Supreme Court of Belgium removed Judge Connerrote from the Dutroux case...

"Newspaper, LE SOIR, opined in an editorial that Judge Connerrote had to be removed 'because he was unwilling to refrain from subpoenaing major U.S. diplomats and high government officials, as well as key figures in the Dutch and Portuguese pedophilia cases.'"

"Scallywag Magazine alleged that MI5 used to take foreign diplomats to the North Wales homes, give them boys to 'play' with, secretly filmed them as they buggered, abused and tortured boys then kept the tapes as evidence. Over a dozen victims who complained of abuse by the paedophile ring 'have met suspicious deaths'." - (North Wales paedophile ring, top people, the police and the security services. Now defunct magazine Scallywag covered events at Bryn Alyn in detail.)

"MI5 had been aware of a homosexual vice ring operating within the Kincora Boys Home in East Belfast. Colin Wallace was instructed to leak intelligence reports on Kincora (as part of a project code-named Clockwork Orange 2) to put pressure on key people..."aangirfan: Kincora Boys

Link: <!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302125215/http://dutroux.blogspot.com/<!-- m -->

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:44 pm 
Been Cautioned
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:02 pm
Posts: 446
Estelle wrote:
Zeppo wrote:
The government are around, although this case is helping them implement their politacal agenda. I don't think this has anything to do with protecting high up peadophiles imo.

What there is, is a peadophile, a stranger, who is dark and swarthy, foreign and untraceable. ????not


It is very rare for a stranger to abduct a child....usually a child is abducted by someone she knows and trusts.

Zeppo, I noticed that you seem to believe in a kidnap theory.

I believe that there could have been some pedophiliac activites earlier that week with somone known to the McCanns in return for protection.


Hi Estelle,

that's right, I do think it's a kidnap, and probably arranged or done by people known to Madeleine/ McCann family. How close? The tapas maybe.

Anyway, happily in the thought that there are no peadophile links with this one at all. The stories are just there to scare ya.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Motives for Government Protection?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:58 pm 
First Time Offender

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:25 am
Posts: 521
Location: Australia
COMMON PURPOSE CONNECTIONS

I HAVE COLLECTED THIS INFORMATION HERE AS I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT COMMON PURPOSE BUT IT COULD BE RELEVANT

Stevo Says:

February 29th, 2008 at 9:49 pm
806 Brandon Flours
_______________________
Batman

I’ve been doing loads of research into the Common Purpose connections because it’s the only valid link I can see that ties in all those key players. The outfit is full of negative press and publicity on the Internet and no wonder. I was looking for all kinds of connections and the Haysmacintyre one is too close for comfort to be random.

CP operates under Chatham House rules. This effectively means they are a secret society. Chatham House has as their major corporate members:

2 ASTRAZENECA PLC*
13 CONTROL RISKS GROUP*
19 FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE*
22 HOME OFFICE*
37 ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND*
47 VIRGIN ATLANTIC*
122 FINANCIAL TIMES*
152 INDEPENDENT TELEVISION NEWS*
210 TELEGRAPH MEDIA GROUP*
211 TIMES NEWSPAPERS LTD*

826 stevo
another interesting connection is prescott:
714 âde Says:
February 29th, 2008 at 8:01 pm
703 Trismegistus
interesting prestcott connection
the founder of common purpose was also a prestcott aide…

julia middleton
<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302125215/http://www.commonpurpose.org.uk/home/aboutus/history.aspx<!-- m -->
now i’ve always found prescott to be dodgy
but never sacked

Tell me that the above haven’t featured in Team McCann and I’ll eat my hat!

Stevo Says:

February 29th, 2008 at 10:01 pm
831 Bâtman

The presence of Control Risks Group and RBS in the Chatham House list is such a coincidence. Brian Kennedy is well tied in with RBS. Control Risks Group are the Metodo 3 predecessors aren’t they?

I’ve amassed so much stuff on CP that I’m toying with the idea of a CP website when the dust settles on the McCann case. Prescott is total EU but there’s someone more involved than him - Janet Paraskeva.

Looking beyond CP, did you know Julia Middleton was in a Marxist group called DEMOS before she started CP?

Also…CP is actually 3 separate companies. One of them “Common Purpose International” was called “Civilia Foundation” and “Civilia Ltd” before that. Civilia Foundation is a now defunct website in the Czech Republic. Their totalitarian views are not really a good thing in my opinion - not when you consider they are recruiting high ranking people who control public funds.

Yes, Chatham House was formerly known as the Royal Institute of Foreign Affairs. It’s been suggested that GM has something over some high ranking officials and this is why so many were quick to jump to his aid.

<!-- m -->http://web.archive.org/web/20080302125215/http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/181332.html?cp=all<!-- m -->

_________________
Justice for Maddie!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous: <select name=st><option value=0 selected>All posts</option><option value=1>1 day</option><option value=7>7 days</option><option value=14>2 weeks</option><option value=30>1 month</option><option value=90>3 months</option><option value=180>6 months</option><option value=365>1 year</option></select> Sort by <select name=sk><option value=a>Author</option><option value=t selected>Post time</option><option value=s>Subject</option></select> <select name=sd><option value=a selected>Ascending</option><option value=d>Descending</option></select> <input class=btnlite type=submit value=Go name=sort>
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 276 posts ] Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next
Copyright © 2000- Aimoo Free Forum All rights reserved.