MadeleineMcCann Aimoo Forum List | Ticket | Today | Member | Search | Who's On | Help | Sign In | |
MadeleineMcCann > DISCREPANCIES > Thursday May 3rd Go to subcategory:
Author Content
TinLizzy
  • Rank:Diamond Member
  • Score:1787
  • Posts:1787
  • From:Canada
  • Register:11/07/2008 1:17 AM

Date Posted:05/30/2010 3:35 AMCopy HTML

Isn't it one or the other?

The police files tell us that Madeleine died and the McCanns created a simulated abduction that night.

The McCanns 'tell' us they left Madeleine alone in the apartment with the twins behind an unlocked door.

I don't believe anything the McCanns say and I am not going to believe them about this......

I believe the dogs and I believe the police..

They used the hour and a half to execute the 'plan'.

The McCanns needed us to believe it was neglect or their abduction plan would not have been 'believed'...

They didn't leave the Madeleine and the twins alone...

Madeleine was dead that night...

They are not guilty of neglect..they are guilty of far worse!
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->

Last edited by HiDeHo on Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:54 pm; edited 1 time in total
TinLizzy Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #1
  • Rank:Diamond Member
  • Score:1787
  • Posts:1787
  • From:Canada
  • Register:11/07/2008 1:17 AM

Re:May 3rd - Simulated Abduction OR Neglect?

Date Posted:05/30/2010 3:35 AMCopy HTML

Whether they are guilty of neglect on other nights, we don't know, but, in my opinion to claim 'neglect' for May 3rd (when they were probably organising the 'abduction' plan) is giving credibility to an abduction being possible, which is why I believe the McCanns were discussing their checking system with others (Jez Wilkins etc)

The accusation of Neglect is used to the McCann's benefit.

It expresses anger towards them (which they undoubtedly deserve) but at the same time subliminally suggests that because Madeleine was left alone with the twins that this may be the reason they are guilty for her disappearance (abduction).

They were very likely planning the abduction that night and their statement that the children were left alone in the room that night was probably to give credibility to an abduction being possible.

'Neglect' on May 3rd (with the 'appropriate' amount of checks) came from their mouths and I don't believe them for one minute...

The police tell us they were staging a simulated abduction.

The reason there were so many checks that night was because there were things that had to be 'set up' (like an attempt at the shutters?)

Had it been a normal night where they had truly left the children on their own, then the checks would have not been so frequent (in my opinion)

Matthew Oldfield says he came back at approximately 9.00pm, tells Gerry he had listened for the children and Gerry leaves immediately after at 9.05pm?

They weren't checking children that were left alone...they were doing something far more sinister.

Thats what the police 'tell' us...
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
TinLizzy Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #2
  • Rank:Diamond Member
  • Score:1787
  • Posts:1787
  • From:Canada
  • Register:11/07/2008 1:17 AM

Re:May 3rd - Simulated Abduction OR Neglect?

Date Posted:05/30/2010 3:36 AMCopy HTML

Am I missing something?

Maybe the McCanns left their apartment that night...the children were soundly asleep...Madeleine in her bed and the twins in their cots...

After less than half an hour Matt checked and things were quiet...

Gerry checked five minutes later and saw Madeleine with her favourite blanket, thinking how lucky he was...

Twenty minutes later, Matthew checked again and everything was fine.

Half an hour later Madeleine was gone.

Thats what they want us to believe....

Thats the circumstance that creates the 'neglect' issue.

According to the police Madeleine was dead that night.

Statements regarding the checking are questionable....

Matt 'supposedly' checked the children when he went to 'chivvy up' the Paynes but Dianne Webster denied categorically that she had not seen him even though a year later, after speaking with her daughter and son-in-law that she 'vaguely' remembers passing him.


Dianne Webster
In this regard, asked specifically whether, on the journey to the restaurant, if they had passed either of the two individuals described in the preceding paragraph, she answered categorically not.


I want to see them accountable for what was really happening that night and not for the 'safe' accusation of neglect that 'implies' that the opportunity was there for an abduction to happen.

Take neglect out of the scenario and we are left with them being responsible for not only her disappearance, but why they deemed it necessary to hide her death and subsequently avoid an autopsy.

How can you neglect a child that is dead?
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
TinLizzy Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #3
  • Rank:Diamond Member
  • Score:1787
  • Posts:1787
  • From:Canada
  • Register:11/07/2008 1:17 AM

Re:May 3rd - Simulated Abduction OR Neglect?

Date Posted:05/30/2010 3:37 AMCopy HTML

It's because of all the discrepancies before May 3rd that leads me to believe it did happen at an earlier time.

If it was about neglect then they would be defending their parenting skills...they would never have admitted the door was left unlocked. etc.

If it was about neglect it would have transpired exactly as they say..

Madeleine left alone with the twins in the apartment..vulnerable...and ultimately disappeared because of their neglect!

They LIED ABOUT NEGLECT as a trade-off to allow for the opportunity for an abductor and as a smokescreen for what they had arranged for that night....

The faked abduction....

Not a night out drinking and eating with their friends and leaving the children alone in the apartment...<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
Copyright © 2000- Aimoo Free Forum All rights reserved.