The left image shows a nearly 4 - year-old girl his age sufficiently large. The right picture shows a much younger child , thought like a long time. But how much younger she was in this photo ? Comparisons with videos and other images showed a rough similarity to the Madeleine , which was presented to us in the Christmas Appeal 2007th It was said that these video clips are from Christmas 2006. At this time the twins were almost 2 years old have been . Looking at the video one more time , one is confused. Sean e.g. appears in this excerpt from the alleged 2006er Christmas video stand straight times , and possibly not even being able to run . Here is an image of the alleged Christmas 2006 at the Madeleine investigation the photo looks very similar , concerning the age :
Sean in the background in my opinion is not yet 22 months old, which would have been he would be either Christmas 2006. I rather think he is there 10 months and all took place at Christmas 2005 . But then the search would be the time of their photo , " disappearances " have been about 17 months old. Anyone who has one hand as an old photo on his camera and who are the other such an old photo to the police if there were a lot more current and would have served a most recent photo but rather a search ? And above all, for what purpose ?
By the way, sees the photo of Madeleine investigation of older daughter of the Paynes quite similar. She is younger than Madeleine , and was certainly always at the dinner of all children with their parents around 17:30 here in which one employee testified , Madeleine on 3 to have seen May - of course after they had shown her the photo search . Where should they among so many children to know who else was looking for.
If you still consider that Rachael Oldfield vowed in April 2008 in her interview rogatory stone and bone, that Madeleine on Thursday the 3rd May would have still played tennis in the morning , even though it was long made clear that this Tuesday the 1st took place in May , one wonders why so much effort has been to show that Madeleine on 3 May was still alive.
Update:
If the first picture that went to the police was taken around Christmas 2005, then became the second photo, which went to the press and the most famous of her was taken exactly at this Christmas. (Left an excerpt from the Christmas video , right the first picture to the press) :
12 Comments:
You ask a very good question.
The issue raises serious issues for all students of the McCann case , wants to fully understand the case. The McCanns have things that appear strange. The McCanns have some things which are strange. I guess the truth is for all of us somewhere between the two.
I get some comments in Spanish, which I regret that I must , because I can not verify it . I ask at least to write in English.
I receive some commentaries in spanish which I have to reject because I can not check their content. Please only send in German or English . Thanks
Hi Johanna,
did you once made a mad work. Yes, something is wrong with these photos . And this should probably already be donated to some confusion , as the whole case shows . I could well imagine that the images really were all on the action. But the PJ were probably just not show all the photos, because we all know , under pressure ( time pressure) was to find the child ...
LG Sibylle
Interesting researches , Johanna but I have some doubts about two points
that you mention:
- At Xmas 2005, the twins were a 10 / 2 months old and on this video , they
clearly walk very well (and even run) . No doubt for me , from this video, that it
has been taken when they were much older than one year; Then most,
probably, at Xmas 2006th Anybody who have had children will agree with me
On this point, I believe.
- Regarding the height of Madeleine on the picture you mention in this
note (and a previous one ) does not show the picture her feet and it seems
to me possible, considering her position , that she could be standing up on the
floor of this little house ( on the grass and not ). The difference is not
very big , of course (probably around 2 inches ), but big enough to explain
why her head looks so closed to the top of this entrance ( of 41 inches
height).
Anyway , the average height of a little girl of four years old is over 43
inches. Madeleine is / was then really small for her age in any case when
we look at this picture.
Since the twins celebrate their birthday on the 1st February, they must have been either 11 or 23 months old at that Christmas, unless we see scenes from two Christmases . My daughter was running around perfectly well on her first birthday, but I admit this is less common with boys. But neither Sean nor Amelie look as if they are already two years old.
"Madeleine is / was then really small for her age in any case when we look at this picture .
Yes she was small then and at all times prior. Madeleine's height during the spring of 2006 was estimated as being somewhere in the range of the 5th to the 3rd centile . This was calculated on photographic evidence Alone .
' Turner Syndrome 'was proposed as a possible cause.
"Madeleine is / was then really small for her age in any case, if we in this picture .
Yes, she was so small and at all times before . Madeleine's height in the spring of 2006 it was estimated that somewhere in the area of the fifth to 3rd Percentile. This was calculated on photographic evidence alone.
"Turner 's syndrome "was proposed as a possible cause
Since I can not agree , unfortunately , comparisons with the game against the house and Lily Payne Airport in the video show a likely height of 100cm . What was normal for her age. A much smaller size of 90cm would certainly be a specific feature included in the police files . No, the wrong size specification in connection with the old image should be to some OC employees to identify the third May make it more difficult .
'Do you think the McCanns gave out old Madeleine's height, 90cms , to make identification more difficult for the searchers on the night of the 3rd ? "
' Do you think that the McCanns were made of old Madeleine's height , 90cm in order to complicate the identification of the researchers in the night of the third ? "
Not in the night of the searches, since there was nothing to be found. But the cook or the tapas employees that attended to the children 's high tea would not have Recognised Maddie from the photo and the height and could have been easily fooled to accept L. Payne as being the missing child, if Kate , Fiona , the twins and the Payne 's children had been there on the evening of the third. I think it was essential that there were witnesses apart from CB that had seen her that day , because imo she was dead on the 3rd. The lies regarding the alleged tennis lesson on the third speak volumes.
I really can not accept that Madeleine was only 90cms tall at age nearly 4th She does not look so small for her age photos in the PDL. Hold up a meter rule and imagine a chlld of nearly 4, 10 cms shorter.
Another thing I would add is that Madeleine spent Christmas 2005 with her grandmother Eileen McCann. I do not think that was in 2006 because Sean does not look like a 22 month- old child. Perhaps that short video was done when Maddie returned from Glasgow in 2005 and had her open presents to.
Thanks for your post , Anna , Madeleine was definitely not the 90cm that was given to Interpol and the PJ. She was a lot taller than Lily Payne as we know from the airport video. So why would you give a wrong height and old pictures to the police searching for your daughter right after her disappearance ? Not days or weeks afterwards, but not immediately. I think they wanted to confuse all the employees of the Ocean Club. If they were looking for a much younger and smaller child then they would confirm the presence of Kate with a child complying with the description - Lily Payne who was around at the evening meals, together with the twins , Fiona and Scarlet ...
I come back to this note , Johanna after having seen the video of One More Time, "Madeleine was here . "
In this video, carpet there is a scene showing Madeleine and Sean (or Amelie crawling ) on the.
I do not know if this video has been taken at Xmas 2005 or at another occasion but, evidently before the pictures of "Xmas 2006 ".
[ img ] http://img1.imagilive.com/0710/xmas2005.jpg [/ img ]