Title: Forensics - No Madeleine? | |
MadeleineMcCann > FORENSICS > Random Forensic Information | Go to subcategory: |
Author | Content |
Dizzy_Lizzy | |
Date Posted:02/06/2011 11:42 AMCopy HTML Thanks to meadow and Ian http://themaddiecasefiles.com/topic3839-70.html
meadow wrote: Looking from the files, there is plenty of evidence that forensics were carried out: '' Relating to Apartment n? 5-A - Envelope N? 1 - "recovered from the floor at the entrance to the children's bedroom" 25 hairs with root; 4 hairs only stem; 3 hairs non-human. - Envelope N? 2 - "recovered from the floor next to the bed from which the child disappeared" 3 hairs with root; 25 hairs only stem. - Envelope N? 3 - "recovered from the top of the bed from which the child disappeared" 2 hairs with root; 2 hairs only stem. - Envelope N? 4 - " recovered from the floor next to the bed that was next to the window in the children's bedroom" ll hairs with root; 4 hairs only stem. - Envelope n? 6 - "recovered from the floor of the lounge" 26 hairs with root; 4 hairs only stem; l hair non-human. - Envelope n? 7 - "recovered from the entrance hall at the front door of the apartment" 44 hairs with root; 8 hairs only stem; 6 hairs non-human. '' There is also photographic ''markers on the bed <!-- m -->http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/PJ/P ... RENSIC.htm<!-- m --> These are the original sample & photographs, the list previously quoted - were at the time of the dogs given indicators. The bed linen had long been removed, probably. Ian : How strange that with all these hair samples and so many with roots , they could not definitely confirm one at least belonged to Madeleine |