MadeleineMcCann Aimoo Forum List | Ticket | Today | Member | Search | Who's On | Help | Sign In | |
MadeleineMcCann > PICTURES > HiDeHo Youtube Videos Go to subcategory:
Author Content
TinLizzy
  • Rank:Diamond Member
  • Score:1787
  • Posts:1787
  • From:Canada
  • Register:11/07/2008 1:17 AM

Date Posted:02/23/2012 7:48 PMCopy HTML

TinLizzy Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #1
  • Rank:Diamond Member
  • Score:1787
  • Posts:1787
  • From:Canada
  • Register:11/07/2008 1:17 AM

Re:Criminal Profiler Pat Brown Visits Portugal Youtube

Date Posted:02/23/2012 7:59 PMCopy HTML

Thanks to Annabel (Missing Madeleine)

http://www.algarve123.com/en/Articles/2-1520/American_Criminal_Profiler_probes_McCann_mystery


Pat Brown
American Criminal Profiler probes McCann mystery
She arrived in Lisbon from Washington, D.C wheeling a travel-worn suitcase and carrying a metal detector.

Inside her suitcase, she’d packed a soil probe and a spade. Pat Brown - Criminal Profiler, TV commentator and author - was on a mission. As social networking sites buzzed with the news – split between those that wished her well, and those that vociferously didn’t – Brown was undeterred. “This has nothing to do with self-publicity. I am simply trying to get to the truth”. We caught up with her when Brown arrived in the Algarve after meetings in the capital with Gonçalo Amaral and others who have put their reputations on the line in an attempt to solve the millennium’s greatest mystery.

One of the first questions we asked was why an American criminal profiler and TV personality felt the need cross the Atlantic to Portugal to investigate a missing person’s case that was almost five years old?

“Two reasons,” she told us. “One is that I have always been passionately involved in a search for the truth. It’s not something that makes me popular, but it’s something I care about above my own reputation as this case threatens to prejudice the way missing person’s cases are handled.

“We have a situation here where there are two parents who have refused to cooperate fully with a police investigation – who have refused to answer questions, who have changed their stories and fled from jurisdiction – but who have then taken their story - in the way they want us to believe it - to the media, asking people to donate money to fund a search for a child who, statistically-speaking, is almost certainly dead!
“I can understand bereaved parents doing some crazy things, but never have I seen parents like this before! Their actions have opened the door to speculation.

“My other reason is to show support for Gonçalo Amaral and freedom of speech”. Amaral faces trial for defamation of the McCanns over the publication of his book, “The Truth of the Lie” in which he maintains that three-year-old Madeleine McCann died in apartment 5a on the night of May 3rd 2007. His trial was originally set for February 9th -10th, but postponed. Brown decided to take advantage of her booked flight to see if she could learn anything new by visiting the crime scene.

And did she?

“Yes, absolutely. I discovered more about the situation on the street; I learnt about the locks on the doors and how they work; how the shutter and window would be impossible to open from the outside; about the kind of terrain here – but my line of thought has remained the same: there are two simple answers to this crime.
“The simplest answer is that Madeleine was abducted by a local predator (in which case she would almost certainly have been killed within two to three hours) – and the second simplest answer is that she died in a tragic accident and her body was disposed of.

“To eliminate the second simplest answer, we have to establish without doubt that there was an abduction – and that hasn’t happened”.

Does she believe, like Gonçalo Amaral, that what’s needed is a reconstruction of the night Madeleine went missing?

“Hell yes! And that’s what they have consistently refused to go along with – all of them: the McCanns and the rest of the Tapas group! The McCanns particularly have been their own worst enemies. They could provide answers in a number of ways: by taking part in a reconstruction, by submitting to polygraph testing. You see, they have to be eliminated in order for the first simplest answer to be the highest probability!

“Another aspect that truly bothers me is the promotion of mythology. Sex rings have become the
new bogeyman. Every parent has been made to fear that their child could be grabbed by a sex ring – but sex rings do not operate in hotel complexes!

If a sex ring wants a child, it grabs one off the streets in some poor neighbourhood. It doesn’t snatch a middle-class child from its bed while on holiday, particularly when - if the stories we’re led to believe are true - all the parents were jumping up and down from their dinner table every 15 minutes to check on their children! Any abductor would be lying in wait thinking “when the heck am I going to get a chance to break into an apartment!” Brown’s experience of profiling began when she was already in her 40s and had been working as a sign language interpreter on hospital trauma wards for over a decade. During those years she “saw everything”: gunshot wounds, stab and rape casualties, victims and villains.

The experience taught her a lot about life, crime and circumstance – and then she found herself having rented a room for four weeks to a man she believed should have been “a person-of-interest” in a brutal sexual homicide. This unsettling experience was the start of her interest in profiling and how homicide cases are handled. It took six years for the police to bring the man in for questioning and declare him a suspect in the murder – and it led to Brown specialising in a profession that invariably finds itself called in way too late.

“One of my ambitions is to make profilers a prerequisite on all police forces,” she told us. “We need to be called in right at the beginning. Crime scenes need better handling”.

“If parents were separated when police first arrived on the scene, along with everyone else involved, it would be much easier to verify everyone’s stories - and a true timeline could be established.

“In this case, the McCanns and their friends were given days to confer with each other. The result is that in order to look better maybe, or to explain things that are embarrassing, they may have screwed up the timeline to the extent that they look guilty. Or, if the McCanns were involved in the death of their daughter, they had a chance to get their stories straight”.

So what’s the bottom line? Will this case ever be solved? “If it could be proved that Gerry McCann was at the dinner table in the Tapas restaurant between 9.15 and 9.55” (when a man looking apparently very much like Gerry McCann was seen by an Irish family carrying a child in pink pyjamas over his shoulder as he walked in the direction of the beach) “then that would be proof that there was an abduction”.

“If the cadaver dogs were right” (brought in three months after Madeleine went missing, and which reacted positively to the possibility that a dead body had lain in the apartment) “then there was no abduction”.
And for those two details to be established, we’re back to the reasoning of former police officer in charge of the case, Gonçalo Amaral: there has to be a reconstruction of that fateful night of 3rd May 2007 – using all parties involved.

“But so far as we know, that doesn’t look like happening any day soon!” Brown shakes her head. “I honestly don’t know what the Metropolitan Police are doing with their current review of the case - which is costing millions of pounds. As far as I can see, they haven’t started where they should have started – with crime scene reconstruction.

“That’s where there’s the best crack at getting to the truth!”.

.There is little to take issue with there - I do hope that the pro-Abduction believers read it carefully before rubbishing it.

As for Crime Scene Management, I also agree: I had the misfortune to investigate a death some years ago and the local Police attended first and had cleared away all sorts of physical Evidence because the non-forensically aware plods had decided it wasn't relevant. My role was as an "Expert" and it was immediately abundantly clear that the cleared away items were crucial Evidence.

I was obliged, at the Inquest, to highlight these shortcomings to the Coroner.

Preservation is vital - and if for any reason stuff needs to be moved, it should be recorded for posterity by photographs, drawings, note-taking etc.
TinLizzy Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #2
  • Rank:Diamond Member
  • Score:1787
  • Posts:1787
  • From:Canada
  • Register:11/07/2008 1:17 AM

Re:Criminal Profiler Pat Brown Visits Portugal Youtube

Date Posted:02/23/2012 8:05 PMCopy HTML

http://patbrownprofiling.blogspot.com/2012/02/criminal-profiling-topic-of-day-what.html

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Criminal Profiling Topic of the Day: What about the Window?


After I posted my first blog of this series, we had quite a rousing discussion over the issues of lighting in Praia da Luz in 2007 and if an abductor would feel unnerved going in and out of a window at that location (I am speaking of using this window for purposes of child abduction, not a lesser crime).

#1 Because the lighting was not horrifically deficient and the window was not positioned in a location where it would be extremely unlikely for someone to observe an abductor moving in and out of a window (and, for that matter, quite high odds that someone could observe the crime even though Praia da Luz was not flooded with visitors at the time the McCanns were there), I do not believe an abductor would have targeted the apartment by way of the front window.

But suppose this abductor did decide he really wanted the child inside and he couldn't access the doors. Perhaps he was willing to take a chance going in the window at a time he observed the parents had left the children without any adult supervision.

Could he pull up the shutters, open the window, and climb into the apartment without causing any damage, being heard, or leaving evidence? The McCanns say they believe the window was locked (but not absolutely positive) and the shutters were down. If you are inside the house and you want to open the shutters, you must pull on a cord which raises them (pictured above). If you want to break in, you must push them up; they make a horrible noise and they don't stay up...they go up 4/5 of the way and then fall back down. In the video you can see retired British police officer, PM, giving it a go (this video is distorted due to an unfortunate sideways filming and when compressed for uploading, stretched the horizontal dimension; PM is tall and very fit as you will see in future photos ...sorry, PM!)


<iframe height=315 src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/IeuMzyaCnnY?rel=0" frameBorder=0 width=420 allowfullscreen=""></iframe>

So, the window is not a likely choice for an abductor to access the apartment. With this knowledge and the fact (which Kate McCann does not dispute in the book) that there is no physical evidence of anyone crawling in or out of the window (and the fact that doing so is extremely awkward with a child), such a scenario is unlikely to have occurred. The only other possibility is someone accessed the house through a door, opened the shutters and windows from the inside and passed the child through to an accomplice. This is all very dramatic but walking out the door is easier.

My next post will focus on who could have come in and out the doors.
TinLizzy Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #3
  • Rank:Diamond Member
  • Score:1787
  • Posts:1787
  • From:Canada
  • Register:11/07/2008 1:17 AM

Re:Criminal Profiler Pat Brown Visits Portugal Youtube

Date Posted:02/23/2012 8:21 PMCopy HTML



Pat Brown goes to Portugal in a quest for truth and justice for Madeleine McCann

WASHINGTON, D.C. (Isabelle Zehnder reporting) -- Driven by her desire for truth and justice for missing Madeleine McCann, Criminal Profiler Pat Brown is planning a trip to Portugal Monday.

Madeleine is the British girl who went missing from a resort in Portugal nearly five years ago. 

Madeleine disappeared on the evening of Thursday, May 3, 2007, a few days before her fourth birthday. She was on vacation with her parents and twin siblings in Portugal and went missing from an apartment in the central area of the resort of Praia da Luz. Her parents claimed they left the children alone while they ate at a nearby restaurant.

According to a news report by Telegraph.co.uk, the initial investigation into Madeleine’s disappearance was based on the assumption she was abducted. The report states Portugal police later determined there was a strong possibility she may have died in her room.    

Advertisement
<iframe id=dclkAdsFrameID_12380 _onload="dclkInjectIframe_12380(this, adsenseHtml_12380)" height=250 marginHeight=0 src="about:blank" frameBorder=0 width=300 allowTransparency name=dclkAdsFrameName_12380 marginWidth=0 scrolling=no></iframe>

In September 2007, Madeleine’s parents, Gerry and Kate McCann, and local resident Robert Murat, were named arguidos.

Their arguido [suspect] status was lifted in July 2008 because there was not enough evidence to charge them with a crime, Brown said Friday. Telegraph.co.uk reports the case was archived but can be reopened if new evidence emerges.   

Pat Brown said there are two camps over Madeleine’s disappearance: one of a child who was abducted by a stranger and the other of a child who died, possibly an accidental death. She said there were suspicious circumstances surrounding Madeleine’s disappearance and that it was never proven that Madeleine was abducted.

In recent years the McCanns have instructed their solicitors, Carter-Ruck, to send numerous cease-and-desist letters to people who have publicly questioned their possible involvement in their daughter's disappearance.

While Pat Brown was not the recipient of a cease-and-desist letter from the McCanns a 30-page, self-published eBook she wrote detailing what she believes may have happened to Madeleine was pulled from sale at the direction of the McCanns.  

Fight for freedom of speech

Pat Brown's book, Profile of the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann, was removed from sale by Amazon following a claim by Madeleine's parents, Gerry and Kate McCann, that the book was defamatory.

Carter-Ruck, one of the leading media and defamation law firms in the world, acted on behalf of the McCann’s when they sent a letter to Amazon requesting they pull Brown’s book.

Brown said Friday, “This is important because Carter-Ruck is one of the most feared legal firms in the world for their libel work and this is why Amazon pulled the book; it wasn't worth it for them to have to go up against these legal giants.

"The overly strict libel laws of the UK, along with Carter-Ruck's going after so many, has caused the press to be afraid to print certain stories like this one about my Cease-and-Desist letter.

"In fact, Carter-Ruck is such a force, people say, 'Oh, you've been Carter-Rucked'.”

A press release issued Wednesday by Brown and her attorney, Anne Bremner, said Brown is fighting back "for the cause of freedom of speech and justice."

Anne Bremner is a high-profile attorney with Seattle's prominent Stafford Frey Cooper law firm. She has issued a cease-and-desist letter to the McCanns' on behalf of Pat Brown. Scroll down to read Bremner's letter.    

Brown alleges the McCanns have interfered with her "right to conduct business" and have damaged her professional reputation with their successful removal of her book from sale on Amazon.

She joins the others who believe their quest for truth and justice for Madeleine has been thwarted by the McCann’s and their high-powered attorneys. 

Women in Crime Ink, a blog described as “a well of thoughts on crime and media issues from women criminal justice professionals and authors”, shared Wednesday's press release that read in part: 

“Next week, on February 8th, retired solicitor Tony Bennett faces English prison as the McCanns’ fight to shut down his efforts to bring focus to aspects of the missing child case that point to the parents’ possible involvement.

“Also, the McCanns have sued the detective on their daughter’s case, Dr. Goncalo Amaral, for libel and have had his book, Truth of the Lie, pulled off the worldwide market. The trial is scheduled in Portugal for April.

“Now, Pat Brown has fought back for the cause of freedom of speech and justice, alleging that the McCanns have interfered with her right to conduct business and have damaged her professional reputation with their successful removal of her book from sale. On Monday, Pat will leave for Portugal to continue her quest for truth and justice in the case of Madeleine McCann.”

Last August, Brown said during an interview on the Jim Bohannon Show that she contacted Amazon when she realized her book was no longer listed for sale on their site.

One of the first questions Jim Bohannon asked was, “What happened with Amazon?”

Brown responded that there has been controversy over Madeleine’s parents, Gerry and Kate McCann, over the past four years. She said the controversy is, “Did the McCanns’ have anything to do with the disappearance of their daughter, or, was their child abducted by some predator or child sex ring, or somebody who wanted a little child?” [Jim Bohannon Show, Part 1, Part 2.]

She said there are two camps over Madeleine’s disappearance, one of a child who was abducted by a stranger and the other of a child who died, possibly an accidental death. Brown said there were suspicious circumstances surrounding Madeleine’s disappearance and that it was never proved an abduction took place.

Trip to Portugal 

The press release states:

During her trip to Portugal, Pat Brown will study the town of Praia da Luz and environs, reconstruct the crime, and examine possible locations as to where Madeleine might have been taken, dead or alive. If she discovers evidence to support a theory other than the one that was the focus of her book, she will pursue that information. 

She is looking forward to meeting with Dr. Goncalo Amaral, the ex-detective on the McCann case. Meanwhile, it is her hope and that of her lawyer, Anne Bremner, that the McCanns rethink their actions regarding the Profile of the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann and instruct their solicitors to have Amazon return the book to the market. 

The book is available on Smashwords and Barnes & Noble online. 

Anne Bremner's letter to the McCanns

Cease-and-Desist Letter

Anne M. Bremner
Stafford Frey Cooper, PC
3100 Two Union Square
601 Union Street
Seattle, WA 98101-1374
 
February 1, 2012

Adam Tudor
Carter-Ruck
6 St Andrew Street
London EC4A 3AE
England

Dear Mr. Tudor,
In July 2011, American criminal profiler, author, and television commentator, Pat Brown, released on June 15, 2011 a self-published book of thirty-pages on Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, and Amazon.de, for the price of US2.99. It was titled Profile of the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann, sold 850 copies over the next five weeks and garnered 49 nearly all five star reviews on Amazon.uk alone. Then, the book vanished from sale on all three sites. Upon questioning, Pat Brown was informed by Amazon that they had received communications from Carter-Ruck on behalf of their clients Gerald and Kate McCann that the book was defamatory. 
Mon 7/25/2011 7:27 PM
 
Dear Pat,
 
We have received a notice of defamation from Carter-Ruck Solicitors that says the content of Profile of the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann (UPDATED) B0055WYVCQ, contains defamatory statements regarding their clients, Gerry and Kat (sic) McCann.
 
Because we have no method of determining whether the content supplied to us is defamatory, we have removed the title from sale and will not reinstate it unless we receive confirmation from both parties that this matter has been resolved.
 
Carter-Ruck can be reached at: 
 
6 St Andrew Street
London EC4A 3AE
 
T 020 7353 5005
 
Best regards,
 
Robert F.
This was quite a surprise to Pat Brown as she had never received any communications from the McCanns nor their solicitors concerning any defamatory material in this book, nor had she ever received any communication concerning any defamatory material in her blogs on the case she has posted online at The Daily Profiler over the last four years. As Ms. Brown is an analyst of evidence, she is careful to not state anything as a fact that is not a fact and to clearly state what is a hypothesis or a theory as opposed to proof. She has publicly and repeated explained to anyone reading her analyses of crime that criminal profiling is a methodology which explores the possible and theoretical scenarios that might be considered as logical based on evidence connected with the crime - forensic, linguistic, or behavioral. Any findings resulting from investigative tools which are not acceptable in certain courts of law (such as cadaver dogs or polygraphs) are noted as suitable for speculation, but not as solid proof of anyone’s guilt or involvement in criminal activities. Criminal profiling itself is an investigative tool and not a finding of guilt as Pat Brown clearly notes in her book.
 
Due to the speculative, if analytical, nature of Deductive Criminal Profiling, the methodology used by Pat Brown, she was careful to repeat numerous times throughout her publication that she was not accusing the McCanns of being involved in any crime or in the disappearance of their daughter, Madeleine. She was clearly only “purporting a theory” and exercising “free speech,” both manners of communication Gerry McCann stated he strongly supported under oath at the Leveson Inquiry on November 23, 2011 in London:
"I would like to emphasize that I strongly believe in freedom of speech, but where you have people who are repeatedly carrying out inaccuracies and have been shown to do so, then they should be held to account. That is the issue. I don't have a problem with somebody purporting a theory, writing fiction, suggestions, but clearly we've got to a stage where substandard reporting and sources, unnamed, made-up, non-verifiable, are a daily occurrence.” Gerry McCann
Pat Brown also believes in free speech and the right to purport a theory, it would seem she and Gerry McCann are in agreement that any work that purports a theory as opposed to false statements of fact is acceptable under freedom of speech. Pat Brown’s Profile of the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann opens up discussion of what happened to the McCann’s daughter, further stimulating interest in the case, and keeping Madeleine in the minds of the public. As the McCanns claim this is what they want, Pat Brown’s book is in accordance with this desire. In fact, it is the McCanns themselves who have clearly encouraged massive interest and speculation on this case. Pat Brown is in no way, therefore, infringing on any wish to keep talk about the case to a minimum.
By speaking and writing out quite often and in such a high profile manner, the McCanns have succeeded in making Madeleine McCann the most well-known missing child in modern history (since the Lindbergh baby in 1932). They have stimulated debate worldwide as to what happened to Madeleine. They have publicly purported their own theories; that someone took Madeleine because they wanted to raise a child, that she is being held captive in a sex ring, and that a pedophile had taken her. They have publicly disclosed many details of the case and repeatedly told their version of what occurred before, during, and after the disappearance of the daughter. They have discussed their emotions, behaviors, and opinions. Pat Brown is carrying on that discussion.
Utmost of importance in the entire matter, is the handling and funding of child abduction cases, the prevailing attitudes toward these crimes, and the future of catching child predators. Because the victims are so young and innocent, missing children are among the most publicized cases in the world. In the last three decades with the increase of the Internet and the 24-hour news cycle, awareness of child sex predators and stranger child abduction has radically increased fears of parents that their child will be taken and murdered. In reality, stranger abduction continues to be exceedingly rare for children of Madeleine’s age. Regardless, the paranoia that is engendered when a small child goes missing is a great stress to the community, the police, and resources. Therefore, it is extremely important that each and every case be properly analyzed and understood so that wrong ideas aren’t promulgated and funding and efforts are wasted investigating such crimes improperly. Each child that goes missing is a terrible tragedy for the parents, siblings, relative, friends, and community. Pat has great empathy for any family of a missing child and, most of all, compassion for the innocent young person who has suffered abuse, terror, sexual assault, and, possibly, an early death at the hands of others.

We are requesting that you respect Pat Brown’s right to free speech and to purport a theory as Gerry McCann has stated is not a problem for him. We request that the claim of libel be retracted for the Profile of the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann and the book permitted to be returned for sale at Amazon.

Respectfully,
Anne M. Bremner

TinLizzy Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #4
  • Rank:Diamond Member
  • Score:1787
  • Posts:1787
  • From:Canada
  • Register:11/07/2008 1:17 AM

Re:Criminal Profiler Pat Brown Visits Portugal Youtube

Date Posted:02/23/2012 8:26 PMCopy HTML

Copyright © 2000- Aimoo Free Forum All rights reserved.