MadeleineMcCann Aimoo Forum List | Ticket | Today | Member | Search | Who's On | Help | Sign In | |
MadeleineMcCann > IMPORTANT INFO > Individual Topics Go to subcategory:
Author Content
TinLizzy
  • Rank:Diamond Member
  • Score:1787
  • Posts:1787
  • From:Canada
  • Register:11/07/2008 1:17 AM

Date Posted:08/01/2010 12:06 AMCopy HTML


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-499340/British-diplomat-warned-Foreign-Office-concerns-McCanns.html

British diplomat warned Foreign Office of concerns over McCanns

Last updated at 10:18 03 December 2007


<!-- google_ad_section_start(name=s2) -->

The Foreign Office was alerted to fears over Gerry and Kate McCann by a British diplomat in Portugal just days after their daughter Madeleine went missing.

The diplomat was sent to the holiday resort of Praia da Luz in the days following the four-year-old's disappearance and soon became concerned over "inconsistencies" in the testimonies by her parents and their friends.

After visiting the McCanns, the unnamed diplomat sent a report to the Foreign Office in London, admitting his worries about "confused declarations" of the McCanns' movements on the night of May 3.

Scroll down for more...

Gerry and Kate McCann

Gerry and Kate McCann: 'Lack of co-operation' with the Portuguese police?

He also noted the couple's "lack of co-operation" with the Portuguese police.

The diplomat's concerns were made over four months before Gerry and Kate were named arguidos (suspects) on September 7.

Contents of the letter were leaked to Belgian newspaper La Dernière Heure over the weekend.

The diplomat expressed his fears after receiving instruction from the Foreign Office to provide "all possible assistance to the McCann couple".

The French-language paper printed excerpts of the letter, quoting the diplomat as saying: "With the greatest respect, I would like to make you aware of the risks and implications to our relationship with the Portuguese authorities, if you consider the possible involvement of the couple.

"Please confirm to me, in the light of these concerns, that we want to continue to be closely involved in the case as was requested in your previous ­message."

Although the Government was quick to assist the McCanns in the days following Madeleine's disappearance, direct contact with the couple ceased when they were named as suspects.

La Dernière Heure pointed out that a majority of the diplomats originally involved in the case have now been taken off it.

Scroll down for more...

The then-Prime Minister Tony Blair sent special envoy Sheree Dodd to act as a "media liaison officer" for the pair soon after Madeleine vanished.

Ms Dodd has since resigned from the Foreign Office, while the British consul in the Algarve, Bill Henderson, has retired.

John Buck, the British ambassador in Portugal, no longer works in the country.



Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-499340/British-diplomat-warned-Foreign-Office-concerns-McCanns.html#ixzz0vJA7viB4




http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2009/03/mccann-case-freedom-of-information-act.html


McCann Case: Freedom of Information Act on John Buck former Ambassador

20 March 2009 | Posted by <script type=text/javascript>makeprofilelink("Joana Morais"); </script> Joana Morais Leave a Comment
It was Tony Blair and Gordon Brown who were behind the instructions given to the UK ambassador, John Buck, and to the British consul, Bill Henderson (the two senior UK diplomats in Portugal at the time she disappeared), to make sure Gerry and Kate McCann were given all possible assistance.

A few minutes after the return to Faro of the team of experts that the PJ had sent to Leicester, Her Majesty's British Ambassador, John Buck, to the Portuguese Republic was already visiting their premises. The presence of the diplomat, that has been confirmed by several journalist, is in direct relation with the Madeleine McCann case and was not asked by the Portuguese Authorities. The ambassador has stayed half an hour with the police.

John Buck - British Ambassador in Portugal in May 2006 - resigns his post on 10/09/07 - shortly after the McCanns are made suspects. John is replaced by Alexander Ellis. Leaves the Diplomatic Services entirely.

Related

Daily Express: Madeleine: British Diplomat had doubts about McCanns
3 December 2007 (no longer on-line)

A British diplomat warned the Foreign Office of concerns regarding Mad­eleine McCann’s parents, it emerged last night. Doubts about Kate and Gerry McCann were raised almost immediately by an official sent to Praia da Luz due to what he considered to be “inconsistencies” in the couple’s testimonies about the night the four-year-old vanished. The warning was contained in a classified document sent from the Algarve to the Foreign Office days after Madeleine’s disappearance. Details of the letter have been leaked through the British diplomatic mission in Brussels to the respected Belgian newspaper Derniere Heure.

The unnamed diplomat voices his concern about the “confused declarations” as to the whereabouts of Kate and Gerry McCann and their friends in the final hours before Madeleine’s disappearance. He also mentions the couple’s “lack of co-operation” with the Portuguese police in the light of instructions from London suggesting consular staff “overstretch their authority and put pressure on the Portuguese authorities”. The document also asks for confirmation of orders sent by the Foreign Office in London the day before, commanding embassy staff to give “all possible assistance to the McCann couple”.

Diplomats on the Algarve were told the McCanns had to be “accompanied at all times during any contact with the Portuguese police” by a member of consular staff or by British police officers sent out from the UK. The letter, sent just days after Madeleine disappeared, warns of the risks of siding with the McCanns so completely. Excerpts published in a report by La Derniere Heure quote the diplomat as saying: “With the greatest respect, I would like to make you aware of the risks and implications to our relationship with the Portuguese authorities, if you consider the possible involvement of the couple. “Please confirm to me, in the light of these concerns, that we want to continue to be closely involved in the case as was requested in your previous ­message.”

A huge team of diplomats have been involved in the case since Gerry McCann asked the Foreign Office for help. In an unprecedented move, the then Prime Minister Tony Blair despatched special envoy Sheree Dodd, a former Fleet Street journalist, to Portugal to act as a “med­ia liaison officer” for the McCann family. Direct government communications with the McCanns came to an abrupt halt, however, when the couple were made official suspects in the case in September.

Portuguese detectives believe it is possible Madeleine died as the result of an accident on May 3 in the family’s holiday apartment and that her parents hid and later disposed of her body with the help of their friends. The couple have always said they had nothing to do with their daughter’s disappearance. The Belgian report says it is highly significant that almost all of the diplomats involved at the outset have now been taken off the case.

Special envoy Sheree Dodd has since resigned from the Foreign Office, the British consul in the Algarve Bill Henderson has retired and the British ambassador to Portugal John Buck is no longer in Portugal. Last night the Foreign Office refused to comment on the report.



Extracts from the FOI released by ICO - Information Commissioner's Office

Freedom of Information Act 2000 (Section 50) Decision Notice 3 March 2009 Public Authority: Foreign and Commonwealth Office - Reference: FS50188322

In October 2007 the complainant asked the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) for information concerning communications between the then Ambassador to Portugal John Buck and the Portuguese police on the subject of the disappearance of the child Madeleine McCann. However, some further information continued to be withheld; it was this refusal to provide information that the Commissioner investigated.

FCO added that, at the time of the internal review (December 2007), the investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann had been ongoing and that, for legal reasons, it had not been possible to disclose further information then.

FCO told the Commissioner that, although the Portuguese authorities had released many documents about the investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, sensitivities remained and FCO believed that the section 27(1)(a)* exemption still applied. If FCO were to disclose all the details about HM Ambassador’s contact with the Portuguese police they would risk damaging the relationship on which good inter-governmental co-operation was based.


FCO recognised the public interest in knowing the extent of UK government involvement in the investigation but believed that the reasons for exemption outweighed those that favoured release.

The Full Freedom of Information Act on John Buck, The British Ambassador in 2007 at the time of Madeleine McCann disappearance.




*The exemption under section 27 exists to protect the United Kingdom's international relations, its interests abroad and the United Kingdom's ability to protect and promote those interests. [full PDF  here]

Section 27 consists of two different kinds of exemption:

Section 27(1) focuses on the effects of disclosure rather than on the type of information. Information is exempt if its disclosure would or would be likely to prejudice any of the matters mentioned in section 27(1)(a) - (d):

a) relations between the UK and any other state

b) relations between the UK and any international organisation or international court

c) the interests of the UK abroad

d)the promotions or protection by the UK of its interests abroad

Section 27(2) protects confidential information obtained from a foreign state, an international organisation, or an international court. Section 27(2) describes information by reference to its origins and the circumstances in which it was obtained.
TinLizzy Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #1
  • Rank:Diamond Member
  • Score:1787
  • Posts:1787
  • From:Canada
  • Register:11/07/2008 1:17 AM

Re:British diplomat warned Foreign Office of concerns over McCanns

Date Posted:08/01/2010 12:08 AMCopy HTML

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/british_diplomat_warned_foreign

British Diplomat warned Foreign Office of concerns over McCanns

A concerned UK taxpayer and voter made this Freedom of Information request to Foreign and Commonwealth Office

The request was partially successful.

A concerned UK taxpayer and voter

3 October 2008

Dear Sir or Madam,

Firstly, I would like to quote part of a newspaper report in order
to provide you with the source of my personal concerns about the
matter I have referred to in the Summary box you provide regarding
this FOI request by myself.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...

"The Foreign Office was alerted to fears over Gerry and Kate McCann
by a British diplomat in Portugal just
days after their daughter Madeleine went missing.
The diplomat was sent to the holiday resort of Praia da Luz in the
days following the four-year-old's
disappearance and soon became concerned over "inconsistencies" in
the testimonies by her parents and
their friends.
After visiting the McCanns, the unnamed diplomat sent a report to
the Foreign Office in London, admitting
his worries about "confused declarations" of the McCanns' movements
on the night of May 3.

He also noted the couple's "lack of co-operation" with the
Portuguese police.
The diplomat's concerns were made over four months before Gerry and
Kate were named arguidos (suspects)
on September 7.
Contents of the letter were leaked to Belgian newspaper La Dernière
Heure over the weekend.
The diplomat expressed his fears after receiving instruction from
the Foreign Office to provide
"all possible assistance to the McCann couple".
The French-language paper printed excerpts of the letter, quoting
the diplomat as saying:
"With the greatest respect, I would like to make you aware of the
risks and implications to our relationship
with the Portuguese authorities, if you consider the possible
involvement of the couple.
"Please confirm to me, in the light of these concerns, that we want
to continue to be closely involved
in the case as was requested in your previous ­message."
Although the Government was quick to assist the McCanns in the days
following Madeleine's disappearance,
direct contact with the couple ceased when they were named as
suspects.
La Dernière Heure pointed out that a majority of the diplomats
originally involved in the case have now been
taken off it.
The then-Prime Minister Tony Blair sent special envoy Sheree Dodd
to act as a "media liaison officer" for
the pair soon after Madeleine vanished.
Ms Dodd has since resigned from the Foreign Office, while the
British consul in the Algarve, Bill Henderson,
has retired.
John Buck, the British ambassador in Portugal, no longer works in
the country."

Furthermore :
BRITISH CONSUL Celia Edwards, who replaced Bill Henderson upon his
retirement, resigned from her post on July
1st 2008, after one year's tenure.

My questions which I request an answer to via the FOI facility are
:

A : Was such a report forwarded to the Foreign Office in early May
2007 ?

B : If so, who was the British Diplomat who forwarded this report ?

C : What was the reply/response from the Foreign Office to this
British Diplomat's report about such concerns ?

D : Why did the Foreign Office provide such an unusual amount of
Diplomatic and Government assistance to the McCann's ?

E : Who was the person, or person's, within the Foreign Office who
seemingly overruled the British Diplomat's concerns ?

I hope that clear and unequivocal answers to my questions about
these matters can be provided via your FOI facility.

Yours faithfully,

A concerned UK taxpayer and voter.

<!-- Can use this to get name of who followup was too, if say you play with proper from display, but not sure needed -->Link to this | Send follow up

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

3 October 2008

Dear Sir/Madam

Thank you for your request, which we received on the 3rd October 2008.

Section 8(1) of the Freedom of Information Act reads:

In the Act any reference to a "request for information" is a reference to
such a request which

(a) is in writing,
(b) states the name of the applicant and an address for correspondance,
and
(c) describes the information requested

Therefore, we will be unable to process your request until we receive your
contact details.

We can use this e-mail address for further correspondance. However, I
would be grateful if you can confirm your name.

Many Thanks

Henry Leitch

Information Rights Group
Information Management Group

show quoted sections

Link to this | Reply to this message

Alex Skene left an annotation (3 October 2008)

Information about pseudonyms/anonymous FOI requests here:

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/about...
http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/l... (Paragraph #9)

Link to this <!-- | Report abuse -->

A concerned UK taxpayer and voter

3 October 2008

Dear Leitch,

With reference to your query regarding my FOI request to the
Foreign Office of 3rd Oct 2008, I am forwarding
my e-mail and name to you as you request.

Yours sincerely,

Mr M A Dillon.
[email address]
A concerned UK taxpayer and voter

<!-- Can use this to get name of who followup was too, if say you play with proper from display, but not sure needed -->Link to this | Send follow up

A concerned UK taxpayer and voter

3 October 2008

Dear Mr Leitch,

Please forgive my previous response to your query.

I inadvertently omitted the "Mr" in my response letter.

Yours sincerely,

Mr M A Dillon.
A concerned UK taxpayer and voter

<!-- Can use this to get name of who followup was too, if say you play with proper from display, but not sure needed -->Link to this | Send follow up

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

23 October 2008


Attachment UBS Letter to Mr Dillon.pdf
92K Download View as HTML <!-- (application/pdf) -->


Information Handling Manager
Strategy, Communications & Training Group
Consular Directorate
Old Admiralty Building
London
SW1A 2AH
Tel: +44 (0)20 7008 0123
E-mail: [FCO request email]

<<UBS Letter to Mr Dillon.pdf>>

***********************************************************************************
Visit [1]http://www.fco.gov.uk for British foreign policy news and travel
advice and [2]http://blogs.fco.gov.uk to read our blogs.

Please note that all messages sent and received by members of the Foreign
& Commonwealth Office and its missions overseas may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded in accordance with the
Telecommunications (Lawful Business Practice) (Interception of
Communications) Regulations 2000. We keep and use information in line with
the Data Protection Act 1998. We may release this personal information to
other UK government departments and public authorities.

***********************************************************************************

References

Visible links
1. http://www.fco.gov.uk/
2. http://blogs.fco.gov.uk/

TinLizzy Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #2
  • Rank:Diamond Member
  • Score:1787
  • Posts:1787
  • From:Canada
  • Register:11/07/2008 1:17 AM

Re:British diplomat warned Foreign Office of concerns over McCanns

Date Posted:10/07/2012 12:00 PMCopy HTML


  
   
 
    
 
 
 
 
Foreign &
 
Commonwealth
 
Office
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES SECTION: DO NOT MODIFY TEXT BELOW 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES SECTION: DO NOT MODIFY TEXT ABOVE 
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office holds and uses data for purposes notified to the Information Commissioner under the Data 
 
Protection Act 1998 (which may be viewed at www.informationcommissioner.gov.uk). Such personal data may be disclosed to other 
UK Government Departments and public authorities. 
 
 
    
 
   
 
 


  
   
 
    
 
 
 
 
Foreign &
 
Commonwealth
 
Office
Our reference: FOI 0816-08 (CONS 54/2008) 
 
Consular Directorate (G/55a) 
Old Admiralty Building 
23 October 2008 
 
 
LONDON 
 
SW1A 2AH 
M A Dillon 
 
By email: [FOI #3383 email] 
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7008 0123 
 
E-mail: [FCO request email] 
 
 
Dear Mr Dillon, 
 
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) REQUEST 
 
Thank you for your email of 3 October to the Information Management Group in which you 
requested information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA). You requested 
information relating to an article that appeared in the Mail Online on 3 December 2007. This 
discussed a report on the abduction of Madeleine McCann that was allegedly written by a British 
diplomat and later leaked to a Belgian newspaper. 
 
Your request asked: 
 
“A: Was such a report forwarded to the Foreign Office in early May 2007? 
 
B: If so, who was the British Diplomat who forwarded this report? 
 
C: What was the reply/response from the Foreign Office to this British Diplomat’s report about 
such concerns
  
 
D : Why did the Foreign Office provide such an unusual amount of Diplomatic and Government 
assistance to the McCann's ? 
 
E : Who was the person, or person's, within the Foreign Office who seemingly overruled the 
British Diplomat's concerns?” 
 
The FCO neither confirms nor denies that it holds the information that you requested in 
questions A, B, C and E of your request.  By virtue of section 27(4)(a) of the Act, the duty to 
confirm or deny does not arise if compliance with section 1(1)(a) of the Freedom of Information 
Act 2000 would, or would be likely to, prejudice the interests of the United Kingdom abroad 
(under section 27 (1) (c) of the FOIA) or the protection by the United Kingdom of its interest 
abroad (under section 27 (1) (d) of the FOIA).  
 
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office holds and uses data for purposes notified to the Information Commissioner under the Data 
 
Protection Act 1998 (which may be viewed at www.informationcommissioner.gov.uk). Such personal data may be disclosed to other 
UK Government Departments and public authorities. 
 
 
    
 
   
 
 


  
   
 
    
 
 
 
 
Section 27 is a qualified exemption. As such, a public interest test needs to be appliedWe 
recognise that there is a public interest in transparent and open government, and releasing 
information that would inform public debate on our work. However, in this case the information 
sought related to an alleged leaked document. As I am sure you are aware, the FCO does not 
comment on such articles. This is because we believe that engaging in such discussions would 
ultimately have a negative effect on the interests of the United Kingdom, both at home and 
abroad.  
 
We believe that by answering your questions about this alleged leaked document, we could set a 
precedent which would also be likely to have a negative affect on our handling of future cases 
and our ability to assist distressed British nationals overseas. If we were to confirm or deny that 
such information existed in one case, inferences, whether correct or not, might be drawn in those 
instances where we were unable to do so, which would have similar harmful effects.  
 
It is important that consistency is maintained. For this reason, we consider that the public interest 
in maintaining this exemption outweighs the public interest in not maintaining the exemption and 
we neither confirm nor deny that such a report exists. Under section 17(4) of the Act the FCO is 
not obliged to give such a statement. 
 
In relation to question D, HMG provided consular support to the McCann family as we would 
for any British national in similar circumstances.  The provision of consular support is assessed 
on a case by case basis.  The level of consular and media support the McCanns received was 
judged to be appropriate given the extremely difficult circumstances the McCann family were in 
and the exceptional media interest surrounding the case.  We cannot go into specifics about 
the assistance we provided to the McCanns as we have a duty to respect their privacy. 
If you have any queries about this letter, or are unhappy with the service you have received in 
relation to your request and wish to make a complaint, you should write to the Information 
Rights Team at the above address.  If necessary, we will conduct an internal review of how we 
handled your request. Please remember to quote the reference number above in any future 
communications. 
 
If you are not content with the outcome of the internal review, you have the right to apply 
directly to the Information Commissioner (ICO) for a decision.  Generally, the ICO cannot make 
a decision unless you have exhausted the complaint procedure provided by the FCO.  The ICO 
can be contacted at The Information Commissioner's Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, 
Wilmslow, Cheshire SK9 5AF. 
 
Yours sincerely, 
 
[signed] 
Information Handling Manager 
Strategy, Communications and Training Group. 
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office holds and uses data for purposes notified to the Information Commissioner under the Data 
 
Protection Act 1998 (which may be viewed at www.informationcommissioner.gov.uk). Such personal data may be disclosed to other 
UK Government Departments and public authorities. 
 
 
    
 
   
 
 


  
   
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office holds and uses data for purposes notified to the Information Commissioner under the Data 
 
Protection Act 1998 (which may be viewed at www.informationcommissioner.gov.uk). Such personal data may be disclosed to other 
UK Government Departments and public authorities. 
 
 
    
 
Copyright © 2000- Aimoo Free Forum All rights reserved.