MadeleineMcCann Aimoo Forum List | Ticket | Today | Member | Search | Who's On | Help | Sign In | |
MadeleineMcCann > IMPORTANT INFO > Individual Topics Go to subcategory:
Author Content
TinLizzy
  • Rank:Diamond Member
  • Score:1787
  • Posts:1787
  • From:Canada
  • Register:11/07/2008 1:17 AM

Date Posted:05/30/2010 5:23 AMCopy HTML


<!-- #header end -->

NVC analysis of McCann sedative interview

Sedative Interview

Interviewer question

“On that evening did you give to your kids something like calpol to help them sleep?”

 

Gerry McCann -

“(swallow, els&dr)(Intake of breath) you know we’re not gonna (head back) comment, on anything (ec) but you know there is absolutely (head back). No way we use any sedative drugs (head down, ec, head shake, scratch behind l earlobe, looks back at I, slight smile) or anything like that en (ldr, rhb) you know we’ll we have (ldr) co-operated with the police (ldr) we’ll answer any queries ermm (ldr)…any tests that they want to do en.”

 

First cluster – Swallow, eyes look sideways & down right, intake of breath

Firstly, the Adam’s apple is emotionally responsive (i.e. it reflects visceral or gut feelings). Acting through the vagus nerve (cranial X) emotional tension from the brain’s limbic system causes unconscious muscular contractions of the sternothyroid, thyrohyoid and associated inferior pharyngeal constrictor muscles of the Adam’s apple. This movement is evident as the muscles contract to swallow, to throat-clear or to vocalize an objection that may be left unsaid. This swallowing movement indicates feelings of anxiety or embarrassment.

I find it hard to imagine why Gerry would become anxious or embarrassed by this question (angry, hurt, yes), unless of course these feeling were stimulated at the prospect of having to lie in which case it would indicate that either he, or someone else, had given the children calpol or other sedatives to help them sleep on that night.

Secondly, eye movements are largely controlled by the midbrains Oculomotor, Trochlear and Abducens nerves (cranial III, IV & VI). According to neurological research, eye movement both laterally and vertically seems to be associated with activating different parts of the brain. Generally, when eyes look right it is indicative of the brain working at constructing, up right eye movements indicate construction of visual images, sideways right eye movements indicates construction of audio. When eyes look left it is indicative of the brain recalling or accessing memory. Up left eye movements, indicate recalling of visual images, sideways left eye movements indicate recalling of audio. When eyes look down left it indicates internal dialogue and down right indicates that a person is thinking about the question as they recall smell, feelings or taste.

In the video clip, we see Gerry look sideways right and down right. He looks sideways right first. This indicates that he might be constructing something auditory. This might include for example constructing what he will say or could say to the question., or he may be assembling the question in his mind due to the fact that he has not heard it before. We also see this movement directly followed by a right down eye movement. This motion indicates that Gerry is thinking about the question and his feelings. I am uncertain as to whether officials, or anyone else to that matter, had asked Gerry about the use of sedatives before this interview took place; hence, suggestions of Gerry constructing a lie must be posited with caution.

Still, the answer to the question should be easy, either a yes or no. Moreover, when taking into account the media coverage of the sedative use issue I would think that the answer should be well known to Gerry McCann, surely someone must have alerted him to the “ludicrous” suggestions being made in the media!; thus, the answer should be in his near term memory, this would not require him to search for an answer (in this case eye movements would be barely be visible).

Thirdly, the intake of breath that we hear Gerry making may be nothing more than pre-speech in-breath. Interestingly though, the pre-speech in-breath is often used by an array of professionals to add an air of authority and credibility to the qualifying subsequent spoken words. It is also a typical expression of ordinary conscious anxiety and tensions reflected in other kinesic behaviours including the aforesaid.

From this cluster I think it would be fair to say that the question “On that evening did you give to your kids something like calpol to help them sleep?” aroused emotion, albeit anxiety, embarrassment or stress, or a combination of the three. If Gerry did not administer calpol or sedatives to the children that evening (or knows with certainty that no one else had) then I see no reason for the arousal of emotions witnessed.

Second Cluster- Head down, eyes closed, head shake, scratch left ear lobe, looks back at Interviewer but does not raise head, slight smile, look down right, left hand brush away from body.
Observed during “No way we use any sedative drugs”
  
The head down motion is an automatic escape movement designed to remove a body part or parts from danger. It underlies many negative and submissive nonverbal signs (e.g., feelings of guilt or shame or cues of fear or submissiveness). It is suggested that bending motions of the head (and trunk) are neurologically “simple” as NVC signs. As they are unaffected, unintended, and unconscious; thus, they are among the most reliable indicators of mood. Gerry’s eyes also gaze down in conjunction with the head down motion. Gaze-down often reflects guilt, shame, submissiveness or deception. These feelings pass from the limbic system and basal ganglia to the midbrain’s oculomotor (cranial III) and other cranial nerves. Acting in concert, the eye muscles pull together in a downward or sideward eye movement, depending on the mood.
Gerry’s words “No way we use any sedative drugs” appear to arouse feelings of guilt, shame and/or deception. (Note – I rule submissiveness out firstly, as Gerry’s baseline demeanour does not suggest that he is submissive; secondly, as a result of my findings in the first cluster; thirdly, he hardly submits to answering the question does he?) If he is feeling guilty or shameful then the question “what about?” must be asked. If he is telling the truth, then he has no reason to feel ashamed or guilty; the answer is simple, he is lying. However, how big is the lie? Look at the question again, “On that evening did you give to your kids something like calpol to help them sleep?” We should note that he does not anywhere in his answer state that they did not give the children sedative drugs that night, nor does he deny the use of calpol. In fact, what he says is “there is absolutely no way we use any sedative drugs or anything like that”!
Gerry also closes his eyes when he uses the head and eye down motion. When this cue is used during or shortly after a verbal denial, it usually shows that the speaker does not believe his or her own remarks. As true statements are normally given with a confident, face to face or level gaze, which might be held for longer than three seconds. In addition, Gerry also shakes his head in conjunction with the aforementioned NVC signs. Interestingly, the headshake is associated with cognitive dissonance and this is where feelings of uncomfortable tension arise because of holding two conflicting thoughts in the mind at the same time. It should be noted that dissonance is often strong when we believe something about ourselves and then do something against that belief. The headshake is also linked to uncertainty and is gut reactive; thus, this motion originates from the limbic system, which stimulates the special visceral accessory nerve (cranial XL).

The scratching of the ear lobe is a self-touch cue aimed at relieving stress and/or providing comfort. It reflects arousal of the SNS’s flight or fight response. Ear lobe (and nose) scratching results from blood vessel engorgement whilst in this state; thus, this cue is indicative of increased anxiety and may signal deception, disagreement, fear or uncertainty.

We also see Gerry glance back at the interviewer without raising his head; this method is often used in the act of deception to gauge the response of those being addressed. (I.e. it is used to see if the listener is swallowing the lie.)

Gerry also appears to produce a slight smirk, almost a look of amusement. In NVC, smirking is a sign of contempt for the gullibility of the person(s) who are being duped. Smirking is also indicative of someone having something further to share. For example, when Susan Smith stated that wherever her children were she hoped they were ok, she smirked then smiled…she knew where they were and what state they were in; she knew they were dead – she had something further to share.

Gerry raises his left hand and makes a tight brush away motion from the body at neck height. What is interesting is that this motion signifies the brushing away or dismissing of a subject or the spoken words in the event of deception. Furthermore, the tighter the hand or arm movement is to the body the more indicative it is of deception. It should be also be noted that we do not ordinarily make conscious choices about the hand or arm gestures as we are usually too busy talking to notice or care.

This cluster is certainly indicative of deception as Gerry exhibits a combination of deceptive signals that are in agreement with each other: I cannot find one NVC signal that could cast significant doubt on this assertion.

My conclusion is that Gerry McCann  fails to answer the question, choosing instead to skirt around the question in a somewhat defensive manner: Gerry McCann is engaging in the act of deception.

Question

“On that evening did you give to your kids something like calpol to help them sleep?”

Truthful answer

“No I (we) did not” or “Yes I (we) did”

Note – when we are truthful about something we tend to be direct and confident in our spoken word, our NVC mirrors this.

Yet Gerry McCann answers

“You know we’re not gonna comment on anything but you know there is absolutely . No way we use any sedative drugs or anything like that en you know we’ll we have co-operated with the police we’ll answer any queries ermm …any tests that they want to do en…”

 

 I thought it might be interesting for readers to compare the above analysis with a LVA 6.50 analysis of the sedative interview. 

 

 http://voiceanalysistech.com/

TinLizzy Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #1
  • Rank:Diamond Member
  • Score:1787
  • Posts:1787
  • From:Canada
  • Register:11/07/2008 1:17 AM

Re:BODY LANGUAGE

Date Posted:06/28/2010 2:08 AMCopy HTML



http://themaddiecasefiles.com/topic5750-960.html

cherry
In the new Fox TV show, Lie To Me, Dr. Cal Lightman leads a team of experts assisting federal law enforcement, government agencies and local police with their most difficult cases. These experts on the show study the involuntary movements, facial expressions, and vocal tones of suspects to determine who is lying and why. It’s pretty interesting!

The show claims that in a 10 minute conversation, the average person lies three times. While that may or may not be the case, here are 15 different ways that may indicate someone is being less than honest with you. Realize that any single indicator may not be reliable, so be sure and look for multiple indicators and consider the whole context.

1. Lack of eye contact.
One of the classic signs of deception is little to no direct eye contact. If someone is telling the truth, she’s likely to give you her full attention and look right at you.
2. Too much eye contact.
Sometimes liars are aware that they’re not making enough eye contact, so they compensate by giving you too much eye contact. It kinda feels creepy when this happens. It’s like you can’t get away.
3. Looking up and the right.
Some brain scientists believe that looking up and to the right triggers the part of the brain linked to the imagination. Conversely, when someone looks down and to the left, he’s stimulating the section of the brain associated with memories. That’s HIS left, not yours!
4. Lack of gestures.
The less someone gestures, the more likely it is that he’s keeping a secret or telling a lie.
5. Robotic movements.
Someone who’s truly emphasizing a point will gesture with her arms and hands in a fluid or firm way. Someone who’s withholding the truth may use her arms, but the movements will appear stiff instead of natural.
6. Too much detail.
When someone’s made the decision to lie, they will work out many details of their story. Many times, there will be incredible detail with their story, but if you quiz them, there will always be some discrepancies. Wait a few hours and then ask for some detail again. You may be surprised!
7. Hey! Where are their hands?
Observe whether the person you’re talking to:

Places his hands on his lap or clenches them
Covers his mouth when speaking
Touches or covers his face when listening
Rubs his eyes
Scratches on or behind the side of his ear
Any of these could be a signal that you’re being deceived.
8. The one shoulder shrug.
Observe whether the person you’re speaking with raises one shoulder slightly. That could be another indication of deception.
9. Crossed arms and legs.
Folded arms, crossed legs, and limbs kept close to the body indicate a need to protect something … sometimes. I cross my legs all the time and it doesn’t mean anything! It’s just how I sit. In general though, when you’re feeling relaxed and have nothing to conceal, you look relaxed, with your arms and legs in a natural position.
10. Tilting the head away.
Tilting the head away generally indicates discomfort with the situation. On the other hand, tilting the head toward you implies that someone is trying to get closer to the information.
11. Bad posture.
Standing or sitting up straight is an indication of confidence whereas slouching with hands buried deep in the pants pockets suggests insecurity and uncertainty. See, your mom was right, so sit up straight!
12. Inconsistencies when speaking
This is a dead giveaway. Pay attention to conflicting details and contradictions. “I thought you said you were out of town that Friday … ” BINGO!
13. Changes in vocal pitch.
When you’re familiar with someone’s normal speaking voice, you notice when it raises in pitch. This is usually a sign that the person is uncomfortable … or going through puberty.
14. A distinct pause.
When someone is making up a story as they go along, they will have to pause to think about the details. When they have to stray from their rehearsed story, they have to regroup. Pay attention to what’s said after the pause. It might be a lie.
15. A change in the rate of speech.
Again, depending on how well you know the person, you could notice not only a change in their vocal tone but also in how fast or how slowly they begin to speak.

These are just guidelines, none of them are written in stone. Just use them to help you make decisions and never be afraid to start asking questions to determine whether someone is lying or not. There are times you’ll need to push and times you need to let it go. Just make sure you consider the context when someone exhibits one of these actions before immediately assuming they’re lying.


wonder what they would make of all the ers.....and ums..........

TinLizzy Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #2
  • Rank:Diamond Member
  • Score:1787
  • Posts:1787
  • From:Canada
  • Register:11/07/2008 1:17 AM

Re:BODY LANGUAGE

Date Posted:06/28/2010 3:00 AMCopy HTML

MF - BE THE FIRST TO READ RE COVERT FILMING, LIP READER TRNASLATE Sep 14, 2007

From: MSN Nicknametin-lizzy  (Original Message)
Sent: 3/1/2008 4:30 PM
BE THE FIRST TO READ RE COVERT FILMING, LIP READER TRNASLATE
Goto page 1, 2  Next
  
       Forum Index -> The hunt for Maddy
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
LucianDeville
 
Joined: 07 Sep 2007
Posts: 295
Location: LONDON SW3
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 6:47 pm    Post subject: BE THE FIRST TO READ RE COVERT FILMING, LIP READER TRNASLATE   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Hi
As far as we are aware, we have no reason to disbelieve our source.This will be the BIGGEST NEWS ITEM
Our source is a friend of a friend and NOT a police officer/etc.
Here it goes, some may laugh ot off, but trust us, the BIGGEST NEWS ITEM by next week.
The PJ had been secretly filming the McCann's for weeks (but you already may be aware of that)
Thier phones, Email were tapped (Again you may already be aware of that.)
THIS IS WHERE YOU HEARD IT FIRST:
LucianDeville ©2007 All rights reserved. (14/09/2007)

We have it from a very trusted friend that 2 weeks ago a couple of English LIP READERS were summoned to help the PJ to 'study' secret film footage.
As some will be aware, people that use ''sign language' can LIP read.
Scenario - Most people think that once in the open and a good distance from preying eyes, they are safe. What very powerful cameras people objects, people can be clearly recorded miles away.
We feel, that this evidence may be the trumph card up the PJ's sleeve.
Remember, you hear this hear first and when the Portuguese and other media picks up on it, we pointed them in that direction.
Daily Mirror, if you believe in free speech, please do not remove this thread, thanks
_________________
Politeness costs nothing = FACT
Being humble is in our genes = FACT
Last edited by LucianDeville on Fri Sep 14, 2007 7:07 pm; edited 1 time in total
 
Back to top         
 
 
noo
 
Joined: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 356
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 6:51 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
ok Lucian,,, who is this 'we' you keep referring to,,,?
 
Back to top         
 
 
LisbonCalling
 
Joined: 08 Sep 2007
Posts: 42
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 6:53 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Now THAT would make me proud of the boys 
 
Back to top         
 
 
dave_s_yahoo_answers
 
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Posts: 520
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 6:59 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
If this is true, that would be amazing and would put paid to the i***** who keep mocking the Portugese police (ie Phil McCann)
 
Back to top         
 
 
MrPoker
 
Joined: 11 Aug 2007
Posts: 289
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 7:00 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[quote="noo"]ok Lucian,,, who is this 'we' you keep referring to,,,?[/quote]
the voices in his/her head
 
Back to top         
 
 
Psychokiller
 
Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 579
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 7:00 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Oh no, it's all over for the McCanns then. I expect Kate was saying to Gerry: "We must dig Madeleine up and move her to a new location", or perhaps "I'm guilty as sin", or other such damning statements.
Laughable!
_________________
If you only sign one petition this year, make it this one: http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/speakoutzimbabwe/
 
Back to top         
 
 
FindMaddie
 
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 50
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 7:00 pm    Post subject: Re: BE THE FIRST TO READ THIS NEWS = NEXT WEEKS BREAKING NEW   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[quote="LucianDeville"]...[/quote]
I wonder if what they read would be admissible in court?
 
Back to top         
 
 
I_am_bic_pentameter
 
Joined: 07 Sep 2007
Posts: 590
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 7:00 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
the expert reported that gerry had confessed to the killing and it turned out he was chewing a toffee.
 
Back to top         
 
 
mumof5granof2
 
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 825
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 7:00 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Hi hope it will stand in a court of law, They must have all the evidence they need by now surely.
 
Back to top         
 
 
LucianDeville
 
Joined: 07 Sep 2007
Posts: 295
Location: LONDON SW3
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 7:01 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[quote="LisbonCalling"]Now THAT would make me proud of the boys [/quote]
Thank you.
The PJ has been made to look as though they are complete fools.
They do not have the vast experience of British cops as crime levels are lower over there.
Re this lip reading move, our belief is that it was the handy work of the British police. (Credit to the PJ for being big enough to seek help early on)
We had a friend that used to be in the police force years ago - he told us a few times how he was gifted, ie, he could lip read and was used by several police forces to lop read covert footage. - This method may be famialr to some but the police keeps it quiet.

If you know anyone that teaches people to lip read, ask them about it and they may also be aware of this story that is yet to be published by the worlds media.
_________________
Politeness costs nothing = FACT
Being humble is in our genes = FACT
 
Back to top         
 
 
jmsp
 
Joined: 14 Sep 2007
Posts: 7
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 7:03 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
This makes zero sense. Unless they were nude.
Bug Bug Bug
 
Back to top         
 
 
quark1
 
Joined: 13 Aug 2007
Posts: 431
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 7:04 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
If this turns out to be true Lucian, I'll take you to Bar Arguido and stand you drinks all night   
 
Back to top         
 
 
coral
 
Joined: 10 Aug 2007
Posts: 709
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 7:06 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[quote="Psychokiller"]Oh no, it's all over for the McCanns then. I expect Kate was saying to Gerry: "We must dig Madeleine up and move her to a new location", or perhaps "I'm guilty as sin", or other such damning statements.
Laughable![/quote]
Possibly - possibly not. Its like 95% of everything else on this site - specualtion, whicg may or may not be true. I recall some posters saying that it was laughable that the McCanns would be made arguidos and would never happen - and it happened. There has also been things that have proved wrong or havent happened yet.
So yes its your opinion but like everything else - we shall see.
 
Back to top         
 
 
terrybull
 
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 1075
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 7:08 pm    Post subject: Re: BE THE FIRST TO READ RE COVERT FILMING, LIP READER TRNAS   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[quote="LucianDeville"]Hi
As far as we are aware, we have no reason to disbelieve our source.This will be the BIGGEST NEWS ITEM
Our source is a friend of a friend and NOT a police officer/etc.
Here it goes, some may laugh ot off, but trust us, the BIGGEST NEWS ITEM by next week.
The PJ had been secretly filming the McCann's for weeks (but you already may be aware of that)
Thier phones, Email were tapped (Again you may already be aware of that.)
THIS IS WHERE YOU HEARD IT FIRST:
LucianDeville ©2007 All rights reserved. (14/09/2007)

We have it from a very trusted friend that 2 weeks ago a couple of English LIP READERS were summoned to help the PJ to 'study' secret film footage.
As some will be aware, people that use ''sign language' can LIP read.
Scenario - Most people think that once in the open and a good distance from preying eyes, they are safe. What very powerful cameras people objects, people can be clearly recorded miles away.
We feel, that this evidence may be the trumph card up the PJ's sleeve.
Remember, you hear this hear first and when the Portuguese and other media picks up on it, we pointed them in that direction.
Daily Mirror, if you believe in free speech, please do not remove this thread, thanks[/quote]
++++++++++++++++++++++++
If you have soething to say, just say it.
 
Back to top         
 
 
Michelle_B
 
Joined: 07 Sep 2007
Posts: 3
 Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 7:10 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
If explains why they went out jogging every day. They probably thought this was the only time they could discuss things without any risk of being bugged.
 
Back to top         
 
 
Display posts from previous: All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 Months1 Year Oldest FirstNewest First 
 
       Forum Index -> The hunt for Maddy All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next 
Page 1 of 2
TinLizzy Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #3
  • Rank:Diamond Member
  • Score:1787
  • Posts:1787
  • From:Canada
  • Register:11/07/2008 1:17 AM

Re:BODY LANGUAGE

Date Posted:01/22/2011 2:23 AMCopy HTML

 
celticcarla
 
The key to the mystery lies "certainly with Kate, a very special and disturbed woman", guarantees to CM Jose Cabrera Fornero, a forensic psychiatrist who has been following the case since the beginning. The Spanish man attentively watched "the staged interview" that the couple gave to Antena 3, and its purpose was "to have the Spanish people on their side". But 70 percent of the viewers who called the channel believes the McCanns are lying, and the psychiatrist sides with them - "by crying without moving a single muscle, Kate looked like a poker player".

A specialist in facial expressions, Cabrera says that "the face of Kate is always the same, except for the tears - the first ones over the last five months and curiously only after having been criticised for not crying". Now she did it but her face "doesn't express any emotion or feeling. When one cries, one's face muscles move, and she didn't move a single muscle, just like poker players. That is highly significant", says the Spanish psychiatrist, and "brings us the certainty that she is hiding something".

Cabrera says the 30 minutes of conversation ended up being "a non-spontaneous interview, perfectly ordered in terms of the questions that were asked by the journalist. And it gives us the impression that the entire stance was staged by the couple".

The Spanish man even remembers Gerry's last sentence and even considers it "genial": "Don't talk until they take the microphone off you". This only proves that all of it was just a big theatre play, the entire interview was staged. That is clear".

José Cabrera noticed that "during half an hour of interview his only concern was to control her. It's extraordinary. Whenever she opened her mouth to speak, he squeezed her hand - and all of this because the key to this mystery certainly lies with her, she is a very special woman..."

Kate McCann "had psychiatric problems for a long time", the specialist guarantees, and "now they have become worse". Cabrera retained an interview that Maddie's grandparents gave to the Spanish television recently: "In their innocence, they said that Kate had told them, some time before the disappearance, that the little girl was looking increasingly like herself, which from a psychiatric point of view means a lot..."For the Spaniard, the origin of a bad relationship between mother and daughter - that was reflected by the writings about Madeleine in Kate's personal diary - "which is highly significant" for all the specialists that have been following this case since early May". :shock: :shock: :shock:

Gerry's greatest concern has been "to control his wife's impulses in public - and that was once again well demonstrated throughout this interview", says José Cabrera Fornero. "He is the one who dominates the entire situation, he knows everything and he knows he must control her and her problematic personality, so she does not exceed herself in front of the cameras and talks too much..." :twisted:

All the gestures and facial expressions "become fatal for someone who has something to hide" - this is dictated by the experience that was collected over the years by this specialist in forensic psychiatry. "And there is no way to avoid that."


Nothing moves Jose Cabrera "against this couple", whom he does not know, but he defended the McCanns' guilt in the 'Pros & Contras' show on RTP, when the Policia Judiciaria confirmed their suspicions on the couple - and yesterday he reinforced his theory to CM, one day after Kate and Gerry chose Spain for their first interview after becoming arguidos.

The English press itself confirmed yesterday that "70 percent of viewers that called Antena 3 believe the McCanns are lying", the online edition of the 'Daily Mail' announced.

José Cabrera was not surprised: "Any English person is cold, but there is something more to her - her personality is not normal. And he makes an impression by only worrying about her answers..."

(...)

"The interview was a circus act": Moita Flores, criminologist, considers the interview was another act from the McCanns.

Correio da Manha - What is your opinion about the McCanns during the interview they gave to Spanish television?

Moita Flores - The whole thing looked like a circus act to me, duting which the couple repeated the usual commonplaces, once again escaping the essential. And once again they revealed that they have a lot to tell, but they don't want to...

- During this interview to Antena 3, Kate shows herself a lot more emotional that usual.

- But the curious thing was that even before this interview was made, it was known the lady was going to cry, which then happened. And she even managed to play the part well...

- Do you believe there was image staging during this interview?

- One should notice that it was known beforehand that the couple would take the opportunity to compliment the Portuguese police, which then happened...
- Gerry looks confident that the DNA tests cannot incriminate them.

- When he mentioned the tests, it was a silly reply to a docile interviewer. Everybody knows that DNA tests identify people, and they don't lie. But they do not condemn anyone on their own. That was miserable.

- How can the couple's statements be defined?

- It was an act that nobody believes in. After the kidnapping theory, now they insist on their innocence. An innocent person does not need this...(...)
TinLizzy Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #4
  • Rank:Diamond Member
  • Score:1787
  • Posts:1787
  • From:Canada
  • Register:11/07/2008 1:17 AM

Re:BODY LANGUAGE

Date Posted:01/22/2011 4:17 PMCopy HTML

 http://www.mahalo.com/how-to-tell-if-someone-is-lying

How to Tell if Someone is Lying

  • Lie Detection Tips

    • There is no universal set of behaviors that indicate someone is lying.
    • Liars will fidget to release nervous energy.
    • Microexpressions are brief flashes of emotion that will indicate someone's true feelings.
    • Polygraph machines are about 70 to 80 percent effective.
    • Voice stress analysis is only 50 to 60 percent effective.
  • How to Tell if Someone is Lying
    Being able to detect a liar is a skill that many people would like to have. It is useful for law enforcement and security agencies as well as |business owners and managers. Many different methods have been developed in the pursuit of the truth. You should find one or two of them useful if you want to know how to tell if someone is lying.


    In the movie Liar, Liar, Jim Carrey's character goes from being a compulsive liar to being someone incapable of telling a lie. In the process, the film manages to show us how much lying has become a part of our daily lives. We all tell lies. One study suggests that the average person tells at least one lie a day.http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-19960901-000008.htm1


    As much as we might lie, few will admit that they want to be lied to. How can you tell if someone's lying? There's no 100% way to know for sure, but the following methods may help you start to distinguish the fibbers from the saints.

TinLizzy Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #5
  • Rank:Diamond Member
  • Score:1787
  • Posts:1787
  • From:Canada
  • Register:11/07/2008 1:17 AM

Re:BODY LANGUAGE

Date Posted:09/13/2011 6:49 PMCopy HTML

http://themaddiecasefiles.com/post2769.html?hilit=aljezur#p2769

Processos Vol X

Pages 2533 - 2534

Service Information

Date: 2007/09/03

For : Goncalo Amaral

From Ricardo Paiva, Inspector


Subject: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann

During the course of the ongoing investigation, various personal contacts were made by the undersigned with Kate and Gerald McCann, within my task of serving as communication element between the police and the McCann couple.

Within this context, the undersigned was present during various “strange“ behaviours by the couple, who gradually began to react in a very negative manner to the increased investigative activity carried out by this police force, especially during the use of the English sniffer dogs for detecting cadaver odour, when more evidence arose in the investigation for the hypothesis of the death of Madeleine McCann.


Several times, the McCann couple said that the attention of the police should be maintained focussing on the abduction hypothesis, which, in the couple’s opinion, was the only scenario that occurred and that the police should not forget to continue to investigate the suspect Robert Murat.

Strangely, Kate also made several requests, three months after the disappearance of Madeleine, that the police should take blood, hair and nail tests of Madeleine’s twin siblings, because, as she said, she remembered that on the day of Madeleine’s disappearance, in spite of all the commotion and noise made by the authorities and other persons who were looking for Madeleine in apartment 5ª of the OC, the twins never woke up, having been transported to another apartment, they remained asleep, due to which she now presumes that they were under the effect of some sedative drug that a presumed abductor had administered to the three children in order to be able to abduct Madeleine, a situation which Kate refers to being possible according to what she read in a criminal investigation manual given to her by the British authorities, that would have been the procedure of the abductor in the real case involving abduction, rape and murder of the girl.

Today, when the undersigned went to the McCann’s temporary residence to notify them of the need to present themselves at the police station to make statements, being able to take their lawyer with them, Kate McCann immediately reacted in a negative manner, making comments such as “what are my parents going to think” and “what is the press going to say when they find out” and that “the Portuguese police is under pressure from the government to finish the investigation quickly”.

With regard to Gerald McCann, he constantly insisted in giving the undersigned letters and emails that he was receiving, mostly from psychics and mediums, whom he had selected and which mainly contained information without much credibility about the possible whereabouts of Madeleine and her presumed abductor.

More recently, and even before Kate’s interrogation, during a telephone call between Gerald McCann and the undersigned, he made a reference regarding the investigation, that he was certain that the police did not have any proof that could incriminate them with regard to the death of Madeleine McCann and he said that the police were wasting their time in directing the investigation around the parents.

I bring this to your knowledge.
Inspector
Ricardo Paiva

Copyright © 2000- Aimoo Free Forum All rights reserved.